Active SLED Opportunity · MASSACHUSETTS · TOWN AND COUNTY OF NANTUCKET
AI Summary
The Town of Nantucket seeks proposals for an Administrator for its Rental Preservation Program under an RFP. The role involves managing affordable housing initiatives, with evaluation based on experience, scheduling, and project understanding. Proposals are due by June 24, 2026.
The Town of Nantucket ("Town"), through its Housing Department, invites qualified responders to submit proposals for Administrator for Rental Preservation Program. This Request for Proposals ("RFP") is made in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Ch. 30B §6.
The Town of Nantucket is located within the County of Nantucket. The Town functions under a Town Manager/Select Board form of government. The Select Board operates under a Charter and enacts policies intended to promote and enhance the general welfare of the Town. In addition to customary municipal operations, the Town operates a skilled nursing facility, a public school system, two wastewater treatment facilities, a housing department, and a solid waste facility.
The Town of Nantucket is located 30 miles off the south coast of Cape Cod. It was settled in 1659 and incorporated in 1671. The Town has an annual year-round population of approximately 18,000 and up to 65,000 seasonal residents. The island is 14 miles in length and 3 1/2 miles wide. Nantucket is comprised of residential, commercial, and large tracts of undeveloped land, including a state forest. Transportation routes include a busy airport, a thriving seaport, and a locally maintained road system which includes urban, suburban and rural road systems.
Ability of the organization to complete this project on time (personnel abilities, size, resources)
Plan to complete project on schedule (timeline, time on island, methodology, etc.)
Experience with municipalities comparable to Nantucket or larger.
Provide proof that the business or members of the business, as currently constituted, has been regularly and actively engaged on a full-time basis in the type of work described in the section of this RFP entitled “SCOPE OF SERVICES” for a minimum of the past three (3) years. Such proof must include contact information for all businesses or entities for whom the offeror has performed services over the past three (3) years.
o Highly Advantageous: The Proposer demonstrates a thorough and insightful understanding of the project’s goals, challenges, and the broader mission of the Town of Nantucket’s Affordable Housing Trust. The response clearly articulates the purpose and importance of the rental preservation program, the needs of both renters and property owners, and the critical administrative functions required for success. The Proposer identifies key success factors, potential obstacles, and mitigation strategies, and demonstrates how their approach aligns with the Town’s vision. The proposal is well-informed, responsive, and reflects a high level of preparedness and commitment. There are no weaknesses.
o Advantageous: The Proposer demonstrates a solid understanding of the project and its core objectives. The response addresses the essential elements of the program and reflects awareness of the needs of the stakeholders involved. While not exceptionally detailed or innovative, the proposal shows that the Proposer is capable of delivering the required services and understands the expectations of the Town. Any weaknesses are minor and do not affect confidence in the Proposer’s ability to execute the project.
o Not advantageous: The Proposer demonstrates only a basic or incomplete understanding of the project. The response may lack clarity in how the Proposer will support the program’s goals or does not fully grasp the nuances of administering a local housing rental preservation program. Key components of the project may be inadequately addressed or misunderstood. The Town would require further clarification to determine the Proposer’s suitability. Weaknesses are material and could affect project outcomes if not addressed.
o Unacceptable: The Proposer did not address the criterion.
o Highly Advantageous: The Proposer demonstrates extensive, directly relevant experience and has successfully completed multiple projects of a similar scope, scale, and complexity. The submission presents exceptional qualifications, with clear evidence that the Proposer’s background significantly exceeds the Town of Nantucket's requirements. This rating indicates a consistently outstanding track record, with little or no risk of underperformance. There are no identified weaknesses.
o Advantageous: The Proposer demonstrates solid relevant experience and has completed projects comparable in nature to the one proposed. The submission meets the Town’s expectations, with a generally strong track record and minimal risk. Any weaknesses are minor, clearly explained, and do not materially affect the overall confidence in the Proposer’s ability to perform the work.
o Not advantageous: The Proposer has limited or only somewhat relevant experience, and projects presented are not fully aligned in scope or complexity. The response raises concerns about the Proposer’s ability to meet the requirements without further clarification or oversight. Weaknesses are present and may impact performance, though they may be addressed through additional information or mitigation.
o Unacceptable: The Proposer did not address the criterion.
o Highly Advantageous: The Proposer presents a project team with exceptional qualifications, experience, and expertise directly relevant to the Scope of Services. Key personnel have a strong track record of working on similar projects, and their roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and aligned with the project’s needs. The team composition significantly exceeds expectations, offering substantial added value and very low risk to the Town of Nantucket. There are no weaknesses.
o Advantageous: The Proposer presents a capable and appropriately qualified project team with relevant experience. Team members are clearly identified, and their roles are reasonably aligned with the project goals. The submission meets the stated criteria, and any weaknesses (e.g., minor gaps in experience or role clarity) are not material to the Town’s confidence in successful delivery. Risk to the Town is minimal.
o Not advantageous: The Proposer’s project team demonstrates only partial alignment with the project’s needs. Some key roles may be underdefined or filled by personnel with limited relevant experience. The proposal may lack clarity in organizational structure or team coordination, presenting moderate risk to project success. Weaknesses exist and may require clarification or reassignment to ensure effectiveness.
o Unacceptable: The Proposer did not address the criterion.
o Highly Advantageous: The Proposer provides a comprehensive, clear, and well-supported plan that fully addresses all general requirements of the scope of services. The proposal demonstrates a deep understanding of the program’s objectives and includes detailed strategies for promotion and outreach, application processing, eligibility verification, payment facilitation, database management, compliance monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting. The Proposer commits to meeting all delivery requirements, including clear timelines, staffing availability, and communication protocols. The response significantly exceeds expectations, offers innovative or particularly effective methods, and presents very low risk to the Town. There are no weaknesses.
o Advantageous: The Proposer addresses all general requirements adequately and provides a sound approach to each task area. The proposal reflects a good understanding of the program's goals and outlines a reasonable implementation plan for all core responsibilities. The Proposer demonstrates the ability to meet the delivery requirements and presents minimal risk to successful program execution. Any identified weaknesses are minor and non-material, and do not require correction before further consideration.
o Not advantageous: The Proposer addresses the general requirements but provides limited detail or clarity in one or more key areas (e.g., promotion strategy, eligibility review, compliance monitoring, or data management). The proposal raises some concerns about the Proposer’s ability to fully meet delivery expectations, and risks may exist that would require clarification, revision, or additional oversight. Weaknesses are present and may impact the program's efficiency or accountability if unaddressed.
o Unacceptable: The Proposer did not address the criterion.
Provide proof that the business or members of the business, as currently constituted, has been regularly and actively engaged on a full-time basis in the type of work described in the section of this RFP entitled “Scope of Services” for a minimum of the past three (3) years. Such proof must include contact information for all owners for whom the offeror has performed services over the past three (3) years.
Please upload the complete Technical Proposal for this project as described in the Section "Proposal Submission" and "Proposal Evaluation Criteria - Minimum Quality Requirements"
DO NOT INCLUDE ANY PRICING INFORMATION. Please complete the "Price Proposal" section of the RFP.
The Responder must complete the pricing table in the "Price Proposal" section. Please upload the complete Price Proposal with a breakdown of services for this project as described in Section 3 of the RFP.
Please upload the complete Price Proposal with a breakdown of services for this project as described in Section 3 of the RFP.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. FAILURE TO SIGN AND UPLOAD BOTH FORMS WILL DISQUALIFY THE SUBMISSION PER MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS.
Proof of financial stability shall be in the form of a bank reference or audited financial statements of the business entity.
Insurance Required: Proposers shall obtain and maintain at its expense and from insurance companies of a Best Rating of A or better, which are licensed to do business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, insurance as set forth below.
Please upload your proof of insurance.
Signature page from the Town's contract, signed by an authorized individual as a good faith statement that the Contractor is willing to enter into the Town's standard contract form. Please see Sample Agreement in ATTACHMENT A.
Please upload a completed W-9 Form if you have not worked with the Town of Nantucket in the past. The W-9 will be used to set up the Contractor as a Vendor for the Town of Nantucket.
Contract Start Date
Contract End Date
Award will be made within
Number of Months
Years
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.