Active SLED Opportunity · WASHINGTON · CITY OF SEATTLE
AI Summary
The City of Seattle seeks qualified designers and architects to submit pre-approved plans for accessory dwelling units and middle housing under new 2026 legislation. This RFQ focuses on residential housing design services to update the ADUniverse catalog with flexible, accessible, and energy-efficient housing designs.
The City of Seattle is updating its ADUniverse website with new pre-approved plans for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and middle housing now allowed throughout Seattle's residential zones.
We invite designers, architects, and homebuilders to submit ADU and middle housing designs that fulfill the criteria and follow the requirements outlined in our Submission Guide.
In January 2026, new legislation took effect for residential areas in Seattle that expands options for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and other middle housing types. As required under Washington House Bill 1110, all residential properties can now have at least four homes, with greater flexibility for how these homes are designed, configured, and sold. These changes primarily affected Seattle’s Neighborhood Residential (NR) zoning, which has been updated with new standards (see Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 23.44 or this summary of key changes).
We enter this new chapter of housing in Seattle following several years of growth in the production of ADUs after liberalizing our ADU rules in 2019 and launching ADUniverse in 2020. From 2021 to 2025, the City issued permits for nearly 1,000 ADUs each year, a fourfold increase over pre-2019 activity and evidence of high demand for housing choices in residential areas near parks, schools, and quiet, safe streets. Among other resources, ADUniverse includes a gallery of pre-approved ADU plans that offer a faster and more predictable permitting pathway. Since 2020, several hundred permits have been issued for these pre-approved plans.
To support implementation of new NR zoning, catalyze creation of middle housing, and boost housing production, the City of Seattle is updating ADUniverse with a refreshed and expanded catalog of pre-approved plans that reflect the diverse typology of middle housing now allowed throughout our residential zones.
Name of firm, company, or individual(s) submitting the design
Indicate which type this submission reflects. If none of these types reflects your design submission, choose "Other" and explain in the following question. Multiple submissions from the same designer or firm are welcome; complete this entire form for each. Review our Submission Guide for more detail on the typology of designs we are seeking to pre-approve.
| ||||||
Form | Single detached unit | Ground-related duplex | Ground-related triplex / fourplex | Stacked duplex | Stacked fourplex | Stacked sixplex |
Description | A single unit that could be permitted as an ADU or principal unit, up to three stories | Two ground-related attached units that could be permitted as a Double DADU, a principal unit with AADU, or two principal units, up to three stories | Three or four attached units, similar to a townhouse or rowhouse form, up to three stories | Two-story duplex with one home per level Could be permitted as two ADUs, a principal unit with AADU, or two principal units | Two-story fourplex with stacked units | Two- or three-story sixplex with stacked units |
Potential configurations | Could be permitted as a single home or arranged as up to 4+ cottages on one site
| Could be permitted as a single duplex or as 2-3 placed on one site that can accommodate 4-6 units Orientation on the lot could be side by side or front to back | Could be configured for interior and/or corner lots | Could be permitted as a single duplex or as 2-3 placed on one site that can accommodate 4-6 units | Envisioned as one new structure on a lot | Envisioned as one new structure on a lot |
Applicable construction code | SRC | SRC | SRC | SRC | SBC | SBC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of this typology, we aim to curate a gallery of designs that, collectively, reflect the following:
Submissions will be assessed on the following criteria:
Submissions may include up to three 22” x 34” pages in PDF format showing:
This response is mandatory. The determination you have achieved all minimum qualifications is made from this section alone, and therefore, the Evaluation Committee is not obligated to check references or search other materials in your proposal to make this decision.
For each Minimum Qualification listed below, please describe how you meet the minimum qualification.
Minimum Qualification #1
Provide Minimum Qualification
Minimum Qualification #2
Provide Minimum Qualification
Minimum Qualification #3
Provide Minimum Qualification
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Make requested changes to the Contract language using track changes and upload here.
Are there qualifications the Consultants must have to even be considered? Minimum qualifications should ONLY be those that the Consultant must meet to have their proposal considered, meaning you will toss the proposal out in full if the Consultant cannot meet the minimum qualifications.
Minimum qualifications can sometimes be important, such as a professional license. If you require a Minimum Qualification, ensure it is fair, appropriate and reasonable. Consultants can protest these if they seem exclusionary and unnecessary. In addition, some federal requirements may restrict or prohibit the use of such qualifications. Review the terms of the grant to ensure compliance with all such requirements. Minimum Qualifications are only for factual yes/no items which can be easily proven as a matter of fact and on the face of the RFQ response. These are NOT subjective such as “Company needs to be experienced” or “needs to have good references.” These are instead hard and fast criteria we check off “yes or no,” and we will toss them out without further consideration if they say no.
Note to department – All non-federally funded contracts above $395,000 require an Inclusion Plan. If potential work, including all phases, is above $395,000, retain the Inclusion Plan as a required submittal. The Mayor’s 2010 policy requires you to score the WMBE response, for no less than 10% of total points.
Departments are encouraged to list the core Scope of Work items that the department has determined to be available for subcontracting.
Contracts with FEDERAL FUNDING may require different or additional social equity requirements, such as federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) requirements, which are required for US DOT funded projects, such as FTA projects.
Exceptions: Exceptions to the Inclusion Plan requirement are rare. Departments must notify their WMBE IDT representative and PC for a review and written approval of an exception. An exception does not relieve the Consultant of its responsibilities to seek WMBE inclusion if changes to the contract provides opportunities for WMBE inclusion.
For assistance, contact Miguel Beltran at Miguel.Beltran@Seattle.gov or 206-684-4525.
State law requires the City to select the firm deemed to be the most highly qualified to provide A&E services. The City cannot ask for pricing before selecting the most highly qualified vendor.
Per RCW 18.08.320, Architecture includes: the rendering of any service or related work requiring architectural education, training, and experience, in connection with the art and science of building design for construction of any structure or grouping of structures and the use of space within and surrounding the structures or the design for construction of alterations or additions to the structures, including but not specifically limited to predesign services, schematic design, design development, preparation of construction contract documents, and administration of the construction contract.
Per RCW 18.43.020, Engineering is any professional service or creative work requiring engineering education, training, and experience and the application of special knowledge of the mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences to such professional services or creative work as consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning, design, and supervision of construction for the purpose of assuring compliance with specifications and design, in connection with any public or private utilities, structures, buildings, machines, equipment, processes, works, or projects.
Per RCW 18.96, Landscape Architecture is the rendering of professional services in connection with consultations, investigations, reconnaissance, research, planning, design, construction document preparation, construction administration, or teaching supervision in connection with the development of land areas where, and to the extent that, the dominant purpose of such services is the preservation, enhancement, or determination of proper land uses, natural land features, ground cover and planting, naturalistic and aesthetic values, the settings and approaches to structures or other improvements, or natural drainage and erosion control. This practice includes the location, design, and arrangement of such tangible objects as pools, walls, steps, trellises, canopies, and such features as are incidental and necessary to the purposes in this chapter. Landscape architecture involves the design and arrangement of land forms and the development of outdoor space including, but not limited to, the design of public parks, trails, playgrounds, cemeteries, home and school grounds, and the development of industrial and recreational sites.
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.