Active SLED Opportunity · GEORGIA · HENRY COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
AI Summary
Invitation to bid for the installation of a duplex submersible pump station and sanitary sewer extension by Henry County Water Authority, Georgia. Electronic bid submission with key deadlines in July and August 2026.
In general, the project will consist of the following major work items: 1. Installation of a new duplex submersible pump station. ... **Project Type**: ITB - Invitation to Bid (Formal) **Source ID**: PU.AG.USA.2395076.C13708626 **Piggyback Contract**: No **Question Acceptance Deadline**: 07/30/2026 05:00 PM EDT **Questions are submitted online**: Yes **Bid Submission Type**: Electronic Bid Submission **Owner Organization**: Henry County Water Authority **Reference Number**: 0000429463 **Pricing**: In attached document **Bid Documents List**: | Item Name | Description | Mandatory | Limited to 1 file | |---|---|---|---| | Bid Documents | Documents defining the proposal | Yes | No | **Line Items**: | description | quantity | uom | unitPrice | |---|---|---|---| | Lump Sum Price for James Creek Lift Station and Sanitary Sewer Extension, complete, in accordance with the work described in the Contract Documents. | 1.0 | Lump-Sum | | | Owner's Allowance | | | 100000.0 | **Questions and Answers**: | Question | Answer | |---|---| | I kindly ask that Nukote ST-M Lining system by GCU, LLC be approved as an equal to Sprayroq by Spraywall. Submittal package, Record of Experience, and References available upon request. Thank you. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | We respectfully request approval of OBIC 5000 Structural Polyurethane Hybrid Coating as an alternate lining system for infrastructure rehabilitation. OBIC 5000 is a 100% solids, fast-set, spray-applied polyurethane hybrid coating designed to reinstate structural integrity, provide infiltration control, corrosion resistance, and asset life extension. It creates a seamless, monolithic waterproof membrane suitable for wastewater, stormwater, concrete, steel, masonry, pipe, and culvert applications. OBIC 5000 has passed SWAT testing in accordance with ASTM G-210-13 and is designed for use in demanding wastewater and infrastructure environments. Please see the attached technical data sheet for review and approved equal consideration of OBIC lining systems. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Having trouble finding an applicator on the coating (Sprayroq) for the interior of the wet well will Henry County accept an alternate product? | Answered in Addendum 1 | | There is mention of Structural Drawings but we do not see any “S” drawings. in the plans? | Answered in Addendum 1 | | 1) Can AMTECH provide Pump Control Panel made by AMTECH which stand at par with the FLYT? 2) Can we provide Electrical Section offer separately? 3) Can I have Plan holders for this project? | Answered in Addendum 1 | | We would like to request approval to use Sherwin Williams Dura-Plate 6100 as a substitution for the specified Class C manhole liner material for the above-mentioned project. Dura-Plate 6100 is a high-performance, 100% solids epoxy lining system designed for severe wastewater and corrosive environments. It offers excellent chemical resistance, surface tolerance, and long-term durability, making it a suitable alternative for manhole rehabilitation and protection applications. Please find the attached product data sheet and technical information for your review. We believe this substitution will meet or exceed the performance requirements of the originally specified liner. TDS attached https://drive.atlanticpipe.us/url/amnhxwqinv4zt22j | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Bid Set Drawing E-2 Note 4A, describes that the System Integrator shall install the HCWA-Furnished Fiberglass Enclosure Network Panel, NP-100. However, it would be inferred, or is typical, that this panel, along with all other electrical equipment and/or panels are be installed on the same equipment rack along with any other electrical supply & installation execution requirements (e.g.: pathways/conduits), would be installed, and/or provided by the [Electrical] Contractor. Shall the System Integrator plan to provide the NP-100 panel's installation services or can it be confirmed that the [Electrical] Contractor shall perform this? If the System Integrator shall be responsible to install this panel, can it be advised what other scope and/or responsibilities shall be provided by the System Integrator in relation to this panel's installation externally to it beyond its mounting? | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Bid Set Drawing E-2 Note 17 describes that the Owner/HCWA shall provide the new RTU panel, RTU-100. However, this note also describes that the Contractor (inferred to be the System Integrator’s scope of supply) shall submit wiring diagrams and BOM for Engineer approval prior panel fabrication as well as include all associated PLC programming, factory testing, operator training, start-up assistance, and modifications to the County’s Master SCADA/HMI associated with this HCWA supplied RTU panel. Drawing E-2 Note 4A.E also describes that the Contractor shall also install a 10A, 120V 1-pole Circuit Breaker within RTU-100 as to feed UPS backed-up power to Network Panel, NP-100. At minimum, it would be inferred that the System Integrator shall provide the SCADA/HMI modifications as well as startup assistance. However and based on history and/or known capabilities of HCWA, it would be interpreted that the Owner/HCWA would be responsible for the RTU panel's engineering/design, supply, fabrication, PLC programming, testing (factory & onsite), and other related services for this RTU panel. This would include the aforementioned RTU-100 circuit breaker to feed NP-100. Can it be confirmed that the aforementioned interpretation of the RTU-100 scope of supply between HCWA and the System Integrator is correct, or if otherwise, clarify what scope of supply shall be responsible by either parties? | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Are there any special coatings or lining for the wet well and valve vault piping? The DIP specs say standard cement lining and standard coating. The painting section says something different. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Drawing E-5 shows a canopy for the equipment rack and references the structural drawings for additional details. However, we were unable to locate the referenced details in the bid documents. Please provide the canopy specifications, including minimum dimensions, materials, and any applicable structural details. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Please provide the historical flow data for the existing Rex Road Lift Station. This information is needed to properly evaluate and price the lift station modifications and the connection to the existing force main. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Per Note 2 on Drawing Sheet E-2 and Note 6 on Drawing Sheet E-4, the Contractor is responsible for all costs associated with bringing electrical power and natural gas service to the site. Please consider establishing an allowance for these costs, as bidders are unable to obtain reliable pricing from the utility providers during the bid period. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Please provide the as-builts drawings for the existing force main and the existing Rex Road Lift Station. This information is needed to properly evaluate and price the lift station modifications and the connection to the existing force main. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Please provide the plan holder list for this project. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Please provide the minimum required thickness for the Sprayroq coating to be applied to the interior surfaces of the wet well and manholes, as specified in Section 09 90 00-2.3.B. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Specification Section 09 90 00-2.3.B, as well as Drawing Sheets C-1, C-2, and M-2, identify the Sprayroq system as the required coating for the interior surfaces of the wet well and manholes. However, Specification Section 09 90 00-2.2.B.20 specifies a Modified Polyamine Epoxy system (Tnemec Series 434/435). Please clarify which system is required. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Specification Section 00 22 13-26.01 indicates the contractor is responsible for paying fees associated to the Local Land Disturbance Permit. Specification Section 31 25 00 1.1.C states that fees for environmental compliance charged by the County (excluding the $40/acre EPD fee) will be reimbursed to the Contractor under the Allowance in the bid form. Please clarify if the Local Land Disturbance Permit fee is to be included in the Lump Sum Bid Price or if it will be reimbursed via the Extra Work Allowance. If it is to be included in the bid, please provide the applicable fee. | Answered in Addendum 1 | | How long can the existing Rex Road Lift Station can be down for the connection of the force main? | Answered in Addendum 1 | | Specification Section 33 05 61-1.3.B requires buoyancy calculations based on groundwater being at the full height of the structure with an empty wet well. Please confirm this requirement, as the geotechnical report indicates a groundwater elevation of 870 feet for planning purposes. Assuming groundwater at the full height of the structure may significantly impact the wet well design and associated costs. | Answered in Addendum 1 | **Addendums**: | Addendum | Date | Note | |---|---|---| | Addendum No. 1 | 08/03/2026 10:49 AM EDT | |
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.