SLED Opportunity · ARIZONA · CITY OF TUCSON

    Large Diameter Pipeline Inspection and Condition Assessment

    Issued by City of Tucson
    cityRFPCity of TucsonSol. 177834
    Closed
    STATUS
    Closed
    due Mar 24, 2026
    PUBLISHED
    Feb 26, 2026
    Posting date
    JURISDICTION
    City of
    city
    NAICS CODE
    237110
    AI-classified industry

    AI Summary

    The City of Tucson seeks qualified firms for on-call inspection and condition assessment services of large-diameter water pipelines to ensure reliability, safety, and regulatory compliance. This RFP targets firms with advanced technology and expertise to support asset management and infrastructure improvement decisions.

    Opportunity details

    Solicitation No.
    177834
    Type / RFx
    RFP
    Status
    open
    Level
    city
    Published Date
    February 26, 2026
    Due Date
    March 24, 2026
    NAICS Code
    237110AI guide
    Jurisdiction
    City of Tucson
    State
    Arizona
    Agency
    City of Tucson

    Description

    The City of Tucson Water Department is seeking qualified firms to provide comprehensive on-call inspection and condition assessment services for its pipeline infrastructure. The purpose of this Request for Proposal (RFP) is to identify experienced firms with the technology, equipment, technical expertise, resources, and proven methodologies necessary to evaluate the current condition of water distribution and transmission mains.

    The inspection and assessment programs are a critical component of our asset management strategy, designed to:

    1. Ensure long-term reliability, safety, and performance of our pipeline network.
    2. Identify defects, deterioration, or potential failure risks before they compromise service.
    3. Support data-driven decisions regarding maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement.
    4. Comply with regulatory requirements and industry best practices for pipeline integrity management.

    The selected firm will be expected to perform inspection, data collection, and condition assessment using advanced technologies and methodologies appropriate for large-diameter and/or critical pipelines. The resulting data and analysis will form the basis for prioritizing capital improvements and optimizing operational performance.

    This RFP outlines the scope of services, minimum qualifications, and proposal requirements. Respondents are invited to submit proposals that demonstrate their technical capabilities, project approach, and relevant experience in delivering inspection and condition assessment programs for complex pipeline systems.

    Background

    On February 5th, 1999, the City of Tucson suffered its single, largest water transmission line failure in its history, causing approximately 38 million gallons of water to be drained from its largest reservoir, most of which ran through a nearby neighborhood. This single catastrophic failure cost the city approximately $5,000,000 in property and collateral damage and resulted in the condemnation of 12 homes. In response to the City's commitment to implementing a condition assessment program, Tucson Water implemented its own “Pipeline Protection Program” (PPP), which is now managed under the Operational Reliability Condition Assessment (ORCA) division for Tucson Water.

    Project Details

    • Reference ID: 260103
    • Department: Water Department
    • Department Head: John Kmiec (Director)

    Important Dates

    • Questions Due: 2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z
    • Pre-Proposal Meeting: 2026-03-11T20:00:00.000Z — https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/24685466342183?p=TmZwukGfoxsICgf33f

    Addenda

    • Addendum #1 (released 2026-03-17T23:14:48.633Z) —

      Notice:  Due Date Extended 

      Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.

    • Addendum #2 (released 2026-03-20T21:24:19.980Z) —

       Pricing page revision to include an additional table (related to 2.2)  Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.

    Evaluation Criteria

    • 1. FIRM EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR PROJECTS AND PAST PERFORMANCE (30 pts)

      (Section 1: Project Planning and Preparation & Section 3: Structural Evaluation and Data Integration details shall be included in all identified project experiences listed below)

       (Please only submit experiences for the inspection methods you are bidding)

       

      For each pipeline inspection method listed below (1 thru 8) -

      Identify at least three (3) comparable projects for which the firm/team provided professional services for pipeline inspections.

      For each comparable project identified, provide the following:

          1. Description of project (specify name and location)
          2. Project’s original contracted time frame.
          3. Project’s final contracted time frame.
          4. Project Owner
          5. Reference information (two names with telephone numbers per project)
        1. Internal Visual, Sounding & Video Inspection (2.1)
        2. Electromagnetic (EM) Inspection (2.2)
        3. Acoustic Monitoring & Inspections (2.3)
        4. Vibroacoustic Inspections (2.4)
        5. Ultrasonic Testing (UT) (2.5)
        6. Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) (2.6)
        7. Condition Assessment of Joints & Linings (2.7)
        8. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) at Exposed Locations (2.8)

       

      9. Engineering Services for Large Diameter Pipelines (Section 6)

      Identify at least three comparable projects for which the firm/team provided professional services for pipeline inspections.

      For each comparable project identified, provide the following:

          1. Description of project (specify name and location)
          2. Project’s original contracted time frame.
          3. Project’s final contracted time frame.
          4. Project Owner
          5. Reference information (two names with telephone numbers per project)
    • 2. Understanding of Pipeline Inspection & Condition Assessment Programs; Methodology of Approach (20 pts)

       

        1. Discuss the major issues your team has identified on this type of project and how you intend to address those issues.
        2. Describe your firm’s project management approach and team organization during phases of a Pipeline Inspection Program.
        3. Describe systems used for planning, scheduling, estimating and managing the program services.
        4. Describe your firm's method of Structural Evaluation Data Integration and Deliverables.
        5. Briefly describe the firm’s experience on quality control, dispute resolution, and safety management.
        6. Provide any special or unique knowledge that your firm utilizes.
        7. Describe special or unique knowledge, skills, or techniques relevant to project.
    • 3. Price (20 pts)

      RFP PRICING- FILL IN PRICING SHOWN IN TAB 7

    • 4. Experience & Qualifications of Firm/Team (15 pts)
        1. Provide a general description of the firm/team providing professional services.
        2. Describe the firm/team organizational structure.
        3. Provide an Organizational Chart:
          1. Presenting key personnel
          2. Location of personnel (i.e. local office or otherwise)
          3. Present estimated project time commitments (as percentages)
            • Project Manager
            • Core project staff
        4. Provide professional licenses and certifications.
          1. Firm/Team licenses and certifications
        5. Describe firm/team experience with the following agency requirements:
          1. Compliance with AWWA Standards; C300-22, C301-14(R19), C303-24, C304-14(R24)
          2. Compliance with AWWA Manuals; M58, M77,
          3. Other critical considerations for pipeline inspection program work.
            • Confined space entry, inspection, video documentation and reporting.
        6. Provide a list of all current contracts of this nature with private and public entity’s in Arizona, including any contracts you have with the COT:
          1. List all projects awarded to your firm during the last two years.
            • For each project identify the following:
      1. Project description and award date (note if pending).
      2. Entity’s Project Manager (PM) or Project Point of Contact.
      3. Cost of Construction.
      4. Date of completion or estimated completion date if pending.

       

       

    • 5. Experience of Key Personnel Assigned to this Project (15 pts)

        1. For each key person identified, list at least two comparable projects in which they have played a primary role. If a project selected for a key person is the same as one selected for the firm, provide just the project name and the role of the key person. For other projects, please provide:
          1. Description of project (specify name and location)
          2. Project’s original contracted time frame.
          3. Project’s final contracted time frame.
          4. Project Owner
          5. Reference information (two names with telephone numbers per project)

       

        1. Provide Resumes for any proposed consultants and key personnel assigned to the project:

      Submit as a Separate Appendix

          1. Staff Names.
          2. Length of time with your firm.
          3. Project specific experience and qualifications (including years);
          4. Provide key personnel licenses and certifications.
          5. Provide office location for key personnel (i.e. local office or otherwise);
          6. Estimated time commitment for this solicited project.
          7. Number of projects currently committed to.

    Submission Requirements

    • Discounts

      As stated in the Instructions to Offerors. Discounts, the price(s) herein can be discounted by _______%, if payment is made within ______ days. These payment terms shall apply to all purchases and to all payment methods.

    • Cooperative Purchasing Program

      Cooperative Purchasing allows other public agencies to piggyback on the City of Tucson’s contracts. Will your firm provide the City of Tucson, as the lead agency on this regional contract, a rebate in the form of a percentage of sales based upon the other agencies sales?

    • If yes, please state the percentage rebate you will provide.
    • Does your firm have a City of Tucson Business License?
    • Please upload a copy of your business license.
    • Forms to be Filled Out

      Please ensure that all required information is included with your response.

      1. Response to Evaluation Criteria
      2. Pricing Proposal
      3. Offer and Acceptance Form
    • Response to Evaluation Criteria (required)

      Please upload your response to the Evaluation Criteria.

    • Pricing Proposal (required)

      Submit Pricing within Opengov Pricing Tab.

       

    • Offer and Acceptance Form (required)

      Please upload your signed Offer and Acceptance form.

    • Does your response to this solicitation include a request to keep any portion confidential and withhold it from the public record? (required)

      Please note: The City of Tucson is a public agency subject to public records laws. Therefore, all requests to withhold information from the public record must be accompanied by justification. Pricing will not be held confidential.

    • Confidential Information (required)

      If you answered yes, then you must use this field to identify the sections of your submittal that you are requesting be withheld from public record. 

      If sections are not identified as confidential in this field, your request to hold information confidential may not be accepted.

      Please note: The City of Tucson is a public agency subject to public records laws. Therefore, all requests to withhold information from the public record must be accompanied by justification. Pricing will not be held confidential.

    • Is your firm submitting any exceptions for the City's consideration?  (required)

      In accordance with Instructions to Offerors - Exceptions to Contract Provisions, any exceptions that an offeror wishes to submit for the City's consideration must be indicated here in order to be considered.

    • Define the exceptions you are requesting. (required)
    • Living Wage (required)

      Will Living Wage Requirements be a part of the resulting contract?

    • Will the resultant contract have Federal Funding? (required)
    • Special Terms and Conditions (required)

      Please select the required language that should be included under Special Terms and Conditions for this project. Please select all that apply.

    • Insurance Requirements (required)

      Please select the additional insurance coverages required for this project. Please select all that apply.

    • Initial Term of Contract (required)

      What is the initial term of the contract?

      Please use the following format: one (1)

      Even if you selected auto renewal, you need to add the initial term, i.e. one (1)

    • Renewal Options (required)

      Will renewal options be given with this contract?

      If you selected Auto Renewal, select No.

    • Renewal Term (required)

      What is the renewal term of the contract?

      Please use the following format: four (4)

      If no extension options will be given or you selected automatic renewals, please enter "N/A".

    • Pricing (required)

      Will you build the pricing table in OpenGov Procurement?

    • Separate Pricing Document (required)

      If you will be requesting the pricing to be provided by the vendor outside of the OpenGov system, have you attached the required document to this solicitation?

    • Attachments (required)

      Do you have any attachments?

    Questions & Answers

    Q (No subject): Regarding Criteria 3, Price, the pre-submittal meeting noted that the pricing sheet should be submitted separately via OpenGov. Should the provided pricing sheets also be included in the proposal, or only submitted in OpenGov?

    A: The Pricing must be completed in Opengov pricing page and uploaded in the Vendor Questionaire -Price section. No need to include in the technical proposal upload.


    Q (No subject): Under Question 4. Experience and Qualification of Firm/Team, Item 6: Is the intent to include a list of all Inspection and Condition Assessment related projects in the State of Arizona or is this specific to Condition Assessment of large diameter pipelines?

    A: City response: Projects that include Inspection and Condition Assessment of large diameter pipelines in the State of Arizona


    Q (No subject): Can proposals contain selected scope items, or are proposals required to include all scope items to be considered complete for this project?

    A: Yes proposals may contain selected scope items and submit pricing based on the scope item.


    Q (No subject): Can a technology provider submit multiple proposals—for example, one as a subcontractor to another firm and another as a prime contractor?

    A: Yes a provider may submit as a subcontractor to another firm and as a prime contractor.


    Q (No subject): Under 4. Experience and Qualification of Firm/Team, for Item 6: Could you please clarify if it is mandatory to provide only contracts within Arizona, or would it be acceptable to include similar projects from other states in the U.S. as part of our response?

    A: It is not mandatory to provide only projects/contracts within AZ and it is acceptable to include similar projects from other states as part of a response.


    Q (No subject): Under 4. Experience and Qualification of Firm/Team, for Item 5: Based on the RFP, the AWWA standards and references to compliance, namely C300-22, C301-14 (R19), C303-24, and C304-14 (R24), appear to relate primarily to concrete pressure pipe and do not appear to address metallic watermains and/or asbestos cement (AC) watermains. Could the City clarify its intent regarding the applicability of these standards to the proposed scope?

    A: In section 4.4 of the evaluation criteria, AWWA M77 is referenced which covers the metalic water mains and AC pipe noted in the question.


    Q (No subject): Can the City grant a one-week extension to allow adequate time for proper proposal preparation and submission?

    A: Yes a one week extension to the due date is acceptable. An Addendum to follow.


    Q (No subject): Under 4. Experience and Qualification of Firm/Team, for Item 4: Will professional licenses held by firms or individuals in Canada be accepted?

    A: The proposal submittals would be accepted with the firms and/or individuals with licenses from Canada. However all firms who receive an Intent to award from the City shall attain any required State of Arizona Licenses and must have a City of Tucson Business License to work with the City of Tucson.


    Q (No subject): Can the City elaborate on the referred pipe materials for this project and clarify what type of material experience is required under Firm Experience for Similar Projects? Or can the experience be with any pipe material?

    A: Experience can be submitted for any pipe material directly applicable to the inspection method the firm is bidding on.


    Q (No subject): Can the City clarify whether large diameter pipelines for inspection refer to pipelines equal to or greater than 16 inches in diameter? Can the City also confirm the expected diameter range for inspection?

    A: Yes, TW large diameter is defined as ≥16". The range of inspection for this solicitaion is focused on the transmission mains 16'-96" but TW does understand that some of the technologies may be applicable to smaller diameter pipelines (depending on material) and may opt to employ such technolgies as needed.


    Q (No subject): Can the City clarify whether the same reference projects can be used for Firm Experience, Technology Reference, and Firm References?

    A: Yes the same referenced projects may be used for firm experience, technology reference and firm references.


    Q (Prime and Subcontracting): Would we be able to partner with Prime Contractors as a sub to them and submit on our own for services we can provide?

    A: Yes, see question - #4 response.


    Q (Pricing for EM): The pricing table for EM (2.2) does not differentiate between NFT (for PCCP) and RFT (for other metallic pipe). Can we make two submissions to reflect the different technology solutions?

    A: An addendum will soon be published to update the opengov price page with tables to reflect the two titles -NFT for PCCP and RFT for Metallic Pipe.


    Key dates

    1. February 26, 2026Published
    2. March 24, 2026Responses Due

    AI classification tags

    Frequently asked questions

    SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.

    SamSearch Platform

    Stop searching. Start winning.

    AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.