Active SLED Opportunity · CALIFORNIA · VTA PURCHASING

    On-Call Financial Advisory Strategic Consulting Services

    Issued by Vta Purchasing
    localRFPVta PurchasingSol. 267042
    Open · 9d remaining
    DAYS TO CLOSE
    9
    due Jul 2, 2026
    PUBLISHED
    Jun 5, 2026
    Posting date
    JURISDICTION
    Vta Purchasing
    local
    NAICS CODE
    541611
    AI-classified industry

    AI Summary

    VTA requests proposals for on-call financial advisory strategic consulting services. The RFP includes evaluation based on firm qualifications, staffing, work plan, local firm preference, and cost. Proposals and cost submissions are required separately. Important dates include a pre-proposal meeting on 2026-06-12 and questions due by 2026-06-15.

    Opportunity details

    Solicitation No.
    267042
    Type / RFx
    RFP
    Status
    open
    Level
    local
    Published Date
    June 5, 2026
    Due Date
    July 2, 2026
    NAICS Code
    541611AI guide
    Jurisdiction
    Vta Purchasing
    Agency
    Vta Purchasing

    Description

    VTA seeks proposals from responsive and responsible qualified firms to provide on-call financial advisory strategic consulting services on an as-needed basis. VTA intends to establish an on-call list following the completion of the RFP process.

    Project Details

    • Reference ID: S26082
    • Department: Finance
    • Department Head: Greg Richarson (Deputy General Manager, Chief Finance Officer)

    Important Dates

    • Questions Due: 2026-06-15T21:00:00.000Z
    • Pre-Proposal Meeting: 2026-06-12T21:00:00.000Z — Microsoft Teams: Meeting ID 241 818 027 372 872 https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/241818027372872?p=kHhx8BUfjOAlzQeN0d

    Evaluation Criteria

    • Qualification of the Firm (20 pts)

      The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal its qualifications to perform the Scope of Work and its experience in successful delivery and performance of comparable work on comparable projects, including demonstrated capability and experience in:

      (i) any relevant specific experience requirements based on the Scope of Work.

    • Staffing and Project Organization (30 pts)

      (i) Proposer team. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a cohesive team with a clear and effective division of responsibility between the Proposer Members (if applicable) and between the Proposer and the proposed Subcontractors to support successful delivery of the Scope of Work. Demonstrated experience of Proposer and/or of Proposer Members  (if applicable) and the proposed Subcontractors working together performing comparable work on comparable projects is preferred.

      (ii) Key Personnel experience, capability, and qualifications. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal the capability, experience, and qualifications of its nominated key personnel necessary to satisfy the minimum requirements for Key Personnel under the Scope of Work and to successfully deliver the Scope of Work ("Key Personnel"). Demonstrated experience of Key Personnel successfully working together performing comparable work on comparable projects is preferred

      (iii) Organizational and management structure. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a well-defined and appropriately-resourced organizational management structure that: (A) supports effective communication and issue resolution, (B) incorporates those Key Personnel and other personnel that bring relevant experience from comparable projects (including from the Reference Projects), best practices, and lessons learned, and allocates those Key Personnel and other personnel to those roles that enable them to utilize that experience and those best practices and lessons learned to support successful delivery of the Scope of Work, (C) demonstrates the Proposer's understanding of the Scope of Work, including the schedule for the Scope of Work, and (D) demonstrates the adequacy of the labor commitment for the Scope of Work, including taking account of the requirements to scale-up and/or scale-down the labor commitment according to the phasing of the Scope of Work.

    • Work Plan / Project Understanding (30 pts)

      (i) Project Understanding. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a clear understanding of Contract requirements and the risks, challenges, and opportunities for the Project and how, by reference to specific examples, the Proposer's experience delivering comparable work on comparable projects (including the Reference Projects) will be utilized to address those risks, challenges, and opportunities when performing the Scope of Work.

      (ii) Work Plan. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a well-defined and credible work plan for delivering the Scope of Work that: (A) aligns with the Contract requirements and Project objectives, (B) supports timely delivery of the Scope of Work in accordance with the defined milestones, (C) manages and mitigates risks to the Project, (D) establishes clear communication, coordination, and issue resolution protocols supporting productive working relationships between the Proposer and VTA, interfacing contractors and consultants, and external stakeholders, and (E) incorporates, by reference to specific examples, best practices and lessons learned from the Proposer's experience delivering comparable work on comparable projects (including the Reference Projects).

    • Local Firm Preference (10 pts)

      In accordance with VTA Administrative Code, Section 9-11, Preference for Local Firms, 10 points will be awarded to a Proposal if at least fifty percent (50%) of the dollar value of services to be rendered under that Proposal will be performed by a local firm. An additional point will be awarded for each additional ten percent (10%) of the dollar value of services to be performed by a local firm, to a maximum point award of ten percent of total evaluation points.

      For the purposes of this Section 3.1.2(e), local firms are those that currently have their main office or a branch office with meaningful production capability located within Santa Clara County, or those firms who, upon award of the contract by VTA, will establish such a local office. This preference shall not apply when prohibited by law or regulation, or whenever its application will disqualify VTA from receiving federal funds.

      At the time of its Proposal submission and at VTA's request following Proposal submission, including upon or prior to Notice of Recommended Award, the Proposer must provide to VTA evidence reasonably acceptable to VTA that the local firm meets the requirements of the paragraph above.

    • Cost Proposal (10 pts)

      VTA will evaluate the reasonableness of the prices against the competitiveness of the amounts with other Proposals received and adequacy of the data submit supporting the figure quoted. Proposals in which the costs do not reflect a reasonable relationship to the work to be conducted may be viewed as failing to comprehend the requirements of the Scope of Work, and therefore, cause for the proposal to be deemed as being non-responsive pursuant to this RFP, Section 3.1.8.

    Submission Requirements

    • PROPOSAL (without Cost form) (required)

      Refer to Section 4. Proposal Submittals and Forms of the RFP for details on response requirements that are to be submitted in this response section, and upload your COMPLETE Proposal here. Upload cost proposal separately in the next step.

      Submit the following forms as part of your Proposal:

      PROPOSAL FORM 1A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND PROPOSER GENERAL INFORMATION

      PROPOSAL FORM 3: DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS

      PROPOSAL FORM 5: LITIGATION DISCLOSURE

      PROPOSAL FORM 6: GENERAL CERTIFICATIONS

      PROPOSAL FORM 7: NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION

      PROPOSAL FORM 8: REFERENCES

      PROPOSAL FORM 9: KEY PERSONNEL STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY

      PROPOSAL FORM 10: DESIGNATION OF PROPOSER'S REPRESENTATIVE

      PROPOSAL FORM 11: LOCAL FIRM CERTIFICATION

      PROPOSAL FORM 12: LEVINE ACT STATEMENT

    • Separate Cost Proposal (required)

      Proposers shall submit a Cost Proposal for the services requested in this RFP.

      Submit the following forms:

      PROPOSAL FORM 1B. COST PROPOSAL

      PROPOSAL FORM 4: LISTING OF SBE PROPOSER OR SUBCONTRACTORS

      Confirm that your fee proposal is not attached in your Proposal (on the previous step)  and is submitted separately here.

    • Bid Bond (required)

      Each bid shall be accompanied by a certified cashier’s check, or bid bond, in the amount of 10% of the total bid price, payable toSanta Clara Valley Transportation Authority, as a guarantee that the bidder, if its bid is accepted, will promptly execute the Agreement. The bidder shall guarantee the total bid price for a period of 60 days from the date of the bid opening.

      Please scan and upload a copy of your bid bond/cashier's check. Bidder must also MAIL bid guarantee with a postmarked date no later thanThursday, July 2, 2026 addressed to:

      Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
      Alexandria SpitsWarnars
      3331 North First St
      San Jose,CA
      95134

      Please have the Bidder Name, Contract Title ("On-Call Financial Advisory Strategic Consulting Services"), and Contract Number ("S26082") listed clearly on the outside of the envelope.

    • Contract Execution, Payment Bond, Performance Bond, and Certificate(s) of Insurance (required)

      The contract shall be executed by the successful bidder and shall be returned, together with the Payment Bond, Performance Bond and Certificate(s) of Insurance to Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority so that it is received within 14 working daysafter the bidder has received the contract for execution. Failure to do so shall be just cause for forfeiture of the proposal guaranty.

    • SB/DVBE Certification ID

      Please type your SB/DVBE Certification ID. This will be verified by the Cal eProcure Website

    • California Secretary of State Business License

      State your Company's Name Here. This will be verified against the California Secretary of State's Website.

    • Electronic Pricing Table (required)

      Would you like to have bidders respond to an electronic pricing table through ProcureNow?

      Choose this if:

      1. This is a quote for a finite set of goods or commodities
      2. This is a public works bid, but you want the bidder to list their total project cost here.
      3. Seeking services for hourly rate schedules
    • Bid Bond (required)

      Will this solicitation require a bid bond?

    • Separate Fee Proposal Upload (required)

      If not using the Electronic Pricing Table, do you want your bidder to separate a Price Proposal from the rest of the Response?

    • Evaluation Criteria (required)

      Would you like to define the Evaluation Criteria for this solicitation?

    Key dates

    1. June 5, 2026Published
    2. July 2, 2026Responses Due

    AI classification tags

    Frequently asked questions

    SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.

    SamSearch Platform

    Stop searching. Start winning.

    AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.