SLED Opportunity · OHIO · CITY OF CLEVELAND
AI Summary
The City of Cleveland seeks a Construction Management at Risk team for architecture, engineering, and construction services for the Rockefeller Greenhouse Campus, including design-build projects for buildings, general improvements, and solar glazing.
Introduction
The City of Cleveland ("City" “Client” “Owner”) is seeking qualified Construction Management at Risk Team Partners ("Contractor" “Construction Manager” “C-M” “CM-R” “C-M Team” "Consultant") to provide professional Architecture, Engineering, and Construction services for the Cleveland Rockefeller Greenhouse Campus Construction Project. The RFP consists of three Projects.
Project 1 is a Traditional Design-Build for the Rockefeller Greenhouse Admin Building, Forestry Garage, and Historic Brick Garage.
Project 2 is a Traditional Design-Build for the Rockefeller Main Greenhouse General Improvements.
Project 3 is a Progressive Design Build project for the Rockefeller Main Greenhouse solar glazing, with an allowance to cover the entire project.
This project will be managed by the Mayor’s Office of Capital Projects (MOCAP), through the Division of Architecture and Site Development (DASD). MOCAP oversees the administration of the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for all City-owned facilities, outdoor spaces, and infrastructure, working through its three divisions: the Division of Architecture & Site Development, the Division of Engineering & Construction, and the Division of Real Estate.
The mission statement for MOCAP is:
To provide for the planning, designing, construction, and preservation of the City of Cleveland's facilities and infrastructure through collaborative and comprehensive planning, leadership in management, excellence in sustainable design and technical expertise, and quality construction based on integrity and professionalism.
Description of Need
Possible Separate Bid Packages
Based on any opportunity agreed upon with the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Capital Projects, the Design-Builder shall be responsible to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the need for separate bid packages that best serve the economic interests of the City.
City’s and Contractor Consultants
On Project 1, the City has retained Architect and Engineer of Record Consultants through construction, and will remain contractually under the City of Cleveland. The CM-R team will assist the Consultants to meet the CM-R budget. The Consultants shall perform construction administration and advise and consult with the City and perform customary AOR and EOR Construction Administration activities. Additional Professional Services, except those required by the Construction Documents (such as delegated design), are not anticipated by the selected CM-R in this project.
On Project 2, the City has retained Architect and Engineer of Record Consultants through construction, and will remain contractually under the City of Cleveland. The CM-R team will assist the Consultants in completion of the Construction Documents to meet the CM-R budget and attain a permit. The Consultants shall perform construction administration and advise and consult with the City, and perform customary AOR and EOR Construction Administration activities. Additional Professional Services, except those required by the Construction Documents (such as delegated design), are not anticipated by the selected CM-R in this project.
On Project 3, the CM-R team will need to provide full Design and Construction Documents based on the criteria set provided. The CM-R design team will be the AOR or EOR of record. The City’s Project 1 and 2 AOR and EOR will not assist on Project 3, unless the CM-R chooses to contract with that Team.
Existing Documentation Brief
Project 1: 100%, Permitted, Construction Documents for the Rockefeller Greenhouse Admin Building, Brick Garage, and Forestry Garage. This includes a Project Manual.
Project 2: 85% Construction Documents for the Rockefeller Greenhouse. This includes a Project Manual.
Project 3: Criteria documents for the Rockefeller Greenhouse solar glazing project.
| Event | Date | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Site Visit | 2026-03-13T17:00:00.000Z | Rockefeller Greenhouse Lobby 750 E 88th St, Cleveland, OH 44108 |
On Site Parking Directions,
In preparation for this meeting next week, Rockefeller Staff asks that we all park inside the Greenhouse/Urban Forestry Employee Parking area. There is a wedding booked at the Greenhouse at noon on Friday and the City would prefer the Rockefeller CM-R Pre-bid Meeting not take up guest parking spots. The City has requested meeting participants park in area circled in red below.
Thanks
All,
The attached file contains the sign in sheets for the Prebid Conference & Prebid Site Visit.
Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.
Quality of Proposal includes Organization of the Team, Specific Approach to this Project, Ability to Perform the Scope of Services, Capacity to Perform Work, including consideration for current City project workload, and Special Commendations as defined in the “Proposal Submission Requirements” section of this RFP.
Credentials of Key Personnel including qualifications and experience of the Project Team, particularly the project manager and construction general contractor who will be the lead person on this project, and their prior experience and demonstrated ability to perform the scope of work.
Demonstrated history of successful relevant projects to meet proposed schedules and budgets.
Proposed Schedule to complete the work.
This item will be reviewed after the evaluations of qualifications have been completed. This sections score is based on the CM-R fee
In Accordance with the City’s goal of increasing the level of certified Cleveland Small Business, Minority Business Enterprise, and Female Business Enterprise participation in City contracts, the Consultant shall strive to meet the following subconsultant/ subcontractor participation goals:
For the Design (professional architecture, engineering, and preconstruction services) portion of the contract:
For the Construction portion of the contract to be finalized after the project is awarded and a GMP has been agreed to:
Participation percentage is measure as the subcontractors’ contract value as a percentage of the total base bid contract value. Note that suppliers (i.e. subcontractors providing material only, not labor) are evaluated, for OEO participation purposes at 60% of the supplier’s contract value.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Submissions evaluated as “non-responsive” and/or “not making a good faith effort” will be eliminated from further consideration.
See “OEO Compliance” for additional information.
Points will be awarded based on the Cost Proposal in phases 1 and 2 & the following unit costs.
Provide a PDF with the filename in the following format: "FIRM NAME PROJECT NAME Services Proposal YYYY.MM.DD"
Provide a PDF with the filename in the following format: "FIRM NAME PROJECT NAME Fee Proposal YYYY.MM.DD"
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. COMBINE ALL FOUR SCHEDULES INTO A SINGLE PDF. Provide a PDF with the filename in the following format: "FIRM NAME PROJECT NAME OEO Schedules"
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. Provide a PDF with the filename in the following format: "FIRM NAME Non Comp YYYY"
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. Provide a PDF with the filename in the following format: "FIRM Affidavit"
Provide a PDF with the filename in the following format: "FIRM W9"
INSTRUCTIONS: Pursuant to Codified Ordinance Sec. 181.36, the information requested on this page must be supplied by all contractors and any subcontractors having more than a fifty percent (50%) interest in the proposed contract prior to any contract being awarded by the City of Cleveland. Any contractor or subcontractor who is deemed to have made a false statement shall be declared to have acted in default of its contract and shall be subject to the remedies for default contained in its contract. For failure to cure such a default, the contractor or subcontractor shall be automatically excluded from bidding for the supply of any goods or services for use by the City for a period of two (2) years.
If applicable. State "yes" even if there were no RFIs or questions.
If applicable. State "yes" even if there were no Addendums.
Please download the project specific PLA Document below, complete, and upload.
Provide an Executed and signed Exhibit.
The default is OEO language, however, the Airport may have a different requirement.
Q (Contract Delivery Mothod): In the project documents and project description the contract delivery method is listed as Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) for Project 1 and 2., Project 3 is listed as Design Build delivery method. The Project Documents include fully developed drawings and specifications. As apart of the response for Project 1 and 2 the contractor is to provide a GMP. With the information provided and the documents completed how is the a Construction Manager at Risk or Design Build Contract Delivery Method?
A: The Project Team including Architect, selected CM, and the City will review both Project 1 and 2 and discuss any cost savings or other value-engineering the CM sees as potentially benefitting the City. After that GMP review, the GMP and schedule for Project 1 and 2 is “at risk.” For Project 3 the CM will need a design team to finish the criteria documents after drawings are finished a GMP will be established from that point on the project is "at risk".
Q (Project existing conditions ): Who will be responsible for the removal of existing furniture and equipment to allow for the construction scope?
A: City staff will remove greenhouse over stock items to be relocated to other facilities by the City from the Historic Brick Garage. The G.C. will supply a dumpster for City staff to throw away items that are no longer needed or wanted. For the Admin Building City staff will remove furniture that the department would like to keep all leftover furniture obsolete equipment Etc. the G.C. will be responsible for removing and disposal of.
Q (Solar Glazing Compatibility): In the solar glazing narrative document, it states: "the existing structure shall be analyzed for reuse." Who is responsible for ensuring the existing greenhouse structure is able to support the newly imposed loads of the proposed solar glazing, as well as integrate with the existing 1/8" lapped glazing on the roof?
A: From the Owners perspective, it's the contractor / design team. The design team would have their structural put a design together with angle and support it from the riveted steal or from the brick. The solar panels going into the tropical greenhouse are not heavy, and the panels going into the production greenhouse would be a custom size and again, not heavy. Maybe even lighter than the glass if an acrylic panel with an embedded solar cell is used.
Q (Scoring Process Clarification): Please provide clarification on the selection and scoring process for project AR2547 Rockefeller Greenhouse Campus CM-R Improvements. As a “Hybrid” delivery model, the City of Cleveland has asked for “hard bid” numbers, along with unit costs, for Project 1 and Project 2 and at the same time have asked for qualifications from Construction Manager at Risk teams for the selection of a Design Builder for Project 3. If the aim of the Request for Proposals is to establish a relationship with a single Construction Manager to oversee and perform all the prescribed work at the campus under a single, flexible contract, it is important to have a clearly defined method for shortlisting and eventually selecting that Construction Manager. While not an exact fit, I would recommend that the issuing authority utilize the Ohio Facilities Construction Commission (OFCC) methodology for selection of a contractor, including the Best Value Rating Forms for DB and CMR projects, for guidance in the selection of a CMR/DB. With the final GMP for projects 1 and 2 occurring after the CMR selection, the best value rating system allows the Owner to evaluate the submissions based on qualifications and pricing. Different weights can be applied to each category to come up with “best value” submission to work with the rest of the team to establish a GMP. The DB Project 3 should be a separate submission because the contract forms are different for CMR and DB.
A: Thank you for your question, The City will update the scoring system and create more categories for cost. Additionally, the city will rephrase the initial GMP to "Cost Proposal".
Q (PLA ): Are all three projects subject to the PLA ?
A: Yes
Q (Proposal submission ): Should a project staff chart with anticipated staff commitments be included with the qualifications to assure the city that adequate project management is committed for project 1,23
A: Please Review Section 4.1. the City scores points for clarity of proposal. It's up to each CM to decide the best way to present their teams strengths for this project.
Q (CM Fee ): is the CM fee percentage to include staffing ? typically staffing is a separate breakout
A: Please review section 4.1 "Construction Manager Fee Proposal"
Q (Supllier Question ): Following is a question from Kalwall that was submitted to us: "Existing plans call for the existing translucent panels on the lobby canopy, which are not officially Kalwall, to be replaced with solar glass. Should the project come in over budget, or should the existing framework not be sufficient to carry the additional weight of glass, would the project team entertain an Alternate to replace the panels with new translucent panels?"
A: Design decisions about glazing choice and scope will be worked out as part of project 3.
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.