Active SLED Opportunity · WASHINGTON · CITY OF SEATTLE
AI Summary
The City of Seattle seeks proposals for long-haul transportation and disposal services of non-recycled solid waste. The contract, valued at $350M-$450M, requires reliable, environmentally responsible waste transport and disposal aligned with city strategies. Proposals are due by July 29, 2026.
The City of Seattle (“the City”), through its Seattle Public Utilities (“SPU”), is issuing this Request for Proposals (RFP) to select a contractor to provide long-haul transportation and disposal services for non-recycled Solid Waste generated in the City (residential and nonresidential). The resulting services contract will replace SPU’s current long‑haul and disposal contract.
The selected contractor will receive compacted, containerized garbage from SPU’s transfer stations and other City‑authorized customers, transport the material to an approved disposal facility, and return empty containers to maintain required inventory levels. Services must be reliable, fully permitted, protective of public health and safety, and aligned with the City’s long‑term solid waste management strategies.
SPU seeks proposals that provide cost‑effective, environmentally responsible, and operationally reliable solutions that maintain capacity for projected tonnage growth and support flexibility as regional landfill and infrastructure conditions evolve.
The City estimates the total value of the Contract resulting from this solicitation to be between $350,000,000 and $450,000,000 over the full Contract term. This estimate is provided for general planning purposes only and does not constitute a guarantee of any minimum or maximum amount of work or compensation.
All technical requirements for this solicitation are contained exclusively in the Contract (Appendix A). The RFP body does not restate technical content. Proposers must rely on Appendix A when preparing all responses to the Evaluation Criteria in Section 7.
The City welcomes innovative approaches and beneficial alternatives that support the City Priorities described in this solicitation. Detailed instructions for submitting Alternative Proposals are provided in Section 6.
See RFP Section 7.3.1.
See RFP Section 7.3.2.
See RFP Section 7.3.3.
See RFP Section 7.3.4
See RFP Section 7.3.5.
See RFP Section 7.4.
Prepare your response as follows. Submit all required materials and upload each document into the appropriate submittal box designated for that item. Use the required formats and provide all attachments. Failure to provide all requested information on the proper forms and in the order specified, or failure to upload documents into the correct OpenGov submittal boxes, may cause the City to reject your response.
Please upload your Technical Proposal. The Technical Proposal must be based solely on the requirements, specifications, and performance standards contained in the Contract (Appendix A). Proposers are responsible for reviewing Appendix A in full when preparing all responses to the Evaluation Criteria in Section 7.
Please download the below document, complete, and upload.
Please download the below document, complete, and upload.
Please download the below document, complete, and upload.
Please download the below document, complete, and upload.
Proposers must submit a completed Surety Intent Form (Appendix F) with their proposal. The Surety Intent Form must be signed by an authorized representative of a surety company that is:
By submitting the Surety Intent Form, the surety confirms that it has reviewed this RFP and the Contract and that, if the Proposer is selected for award, the surety intends to issue the required Performance Bond in the amount and form specified in the Contract.
Failure to submit a completed Surety Intent Form may result in the City deeming the proposal nonresponsive.
The City encourages Alternative Proposals for transport and disposal services that support the City Priorities described in Section 1. Alternatives may range from minor modifications to operational or processing approaches to major system changes. The City encourages revisions to the base services or Contract specifications that lower costs, enhance services, reduce environmental or community impacts, or otherwise advance the City Priorities.
Examples include, but are not limited to:
Upload your Alternative Proposal into the designated submittal box. Alternative Proposals must be submitted in addition to a fully compliant Base Proposal and must be clearly labeled and sufficiently detailed for evaluation. The City may consider Alternatives during the Best Value Tradeoff if they demonstrably improve value to the City; however, the City is under no obligation to accept any Alternative, and the Base Proposal will remain the foundation for evaluation and award.
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.