Active SLED Opportunity · CALIFORNIA · SANTA CRUZ
AI Summary
The City of Santa Cruz seeks engineering services for inspection of 10 bicycle and pedestrian bridges to assess structural conditions and recommend maintenance. The contract is for two years with a renewal option. Proposals are due May 19, 2026.
The City of Santa Cruz owns and maintains a network of 10 bicycle and pedestrian bridges of varying age, design, and construction type. These structures are critical to public safety and mobility. The city seeks professional engineering services to assess structural conditions, identify deficiencies, and recommend maintenance or rehabilitation actions. The selected Consultant shall perform various tasks and prepare deliverables such as inspection reports, photo documentation, and other deliverables as deemed necessary by the city. The city is soliciting proposals from qualified engineering firms to provide this service within its jurisdiction on a two-year rotation, with half the bridges inspected annually. There are currently 10 bicycle-pedestrian bridges in the city (See Attachment 1). The selected consultant shall perform inspections in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local standards. The contract will run for two years with a two-year renewal option.
The anticipated schedule for the RFP review and award process is from May 19, 2026, to contract award in July 2026.
The City of Santa Cruz was incorporated in 1866 and formed its current charter in 1948. It is governed under a Council/Manager form of government. A Mayor and six Council members set policy for the City and a City Manager serves as chief administrator of those policies. The City is located on the coast, 75 miles south of San Francisco on the northern edge of the Monterey Bay. It encompasses 15.8 square miles with cultural and ethnic diversity among its population of 65,000. Santa Cruz is part of the National Marine Sanctuary and is a popular tourist destination owing to its beaches, surf culture, and historical landmarks.
The City provides a full range of municipal services and facilities including a recreational wharf, public golf course, over thirteen hundred acres of open space, full beach services, refuse management, law enforcement, fire protection, and water and wastewater utilities. The City is also host to University of California Santa Cruz, the Santa Cruz Harbor, and the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk amusement park.
Section 3.2 Proposal Format of the RFP is hereby modified to require the proposals be mailed or hand delivered to the attention of Chris Schneiter. The cost proposal shall be in a separate and sealed envelope. The date and time of proposal submission remains the same and is currently May 19, 2026, at 2:00 PM.
City of Santa Cruz Public Works Department,
809 Center Street, Rm 201,
Santa Cruz, CA 95060.
Attn: Chris Schneiter, Management and Technical Assistant
To be considered responsive, the proposal shall include the information detailed in this section. The proposer must provide information in the proposal in the same order as shown below. The proposal shall be separated into the subheadings referenced below. Failure to provide this information may result in a proposal being considered non-responsive to requirements.
Proposal Format
Proposals should be organized as follows:
Written Technical Proposal
Optional Appendices or Exhibits: Proposers may include sample project information, sample reports, peer review reports, letters of recommendation, or other exhibits that may assist the City in favorably evaluating the proposal. Do not include generic marketing materials.
Proposals will be deemed non-responsive and removed from further consideration if the Proposal is not received in accordance with the terms of this RFP or the Proposer does not meet the basic minimum qualifications and proposal requirements set forth in this RFP.
Proposals shall be typed, as concisely as possible, and shall not include any unnecessary promotional material. The Proposer shall provide the information required in this Evaluation Criteria section and comply with the maximum page limitations provided for each subsection of the proposal. The RFP Required Submittal Documents do not count toward applicable section page limits.
Resumes, if requested, shall be included as a separate attachment. Number every page sequentially beginning with the cover page, including any text, charts and graphic pages, including attachments and exhibits. If used, narrative pages shall be used sparingly and only where required to convey related information that cannot be accommodated. The proposal shall use Arial or a similar, easily readable font. A minimum of 11-point font size and 1.25-line spacing is required for text. Narrow or condensed fonts are not permitted. Font restrictions do not apply to attachments. Different size fonts will be allowed for headings, charts, tables, and graphics and must be easily readable.
This section must include the following (maximum 2 pages):
In this section (maximum 5 pages), include the following:
In this section (maximum 5 pages), include the following:
If awarded the contract, the Proposer shall make every effort to ensure that the staff resources identified in the proposal will be available for the Project. If staff identified in the proposal are not available, the City reserves the right to review and approve alternate personnel.
The work plan shall include a process for delivery of the range of services outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services. To the extent possible, the proposal shall reflect the roles and responsibilities of team members in the major tasks outlined in the Section Preliminary Scope of Services and strategies to accommodate the staffing needs for each task order. As appropriate, include tools and techniques you could use in addressing challenges and delivering services outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services.
Proposers shall address all major tasks outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services and as appropriate, suggest supplemental tasks/sub-tasks for incorporation into the final Section Preliminary Scope of Services.
The work plan shall include a process for delivery of the range of services outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services. To the extent possible, the proposal shall reflect the roles and responsibilities of team members in the major tasks outlined in the Section Preliminary Scope of Services and strategies to accommodate the staffing needs for each task order. As appropriate, include tools and techniques you could use in addressing challenges and delivering services outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services.
Proposers shall address all major tasks outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services and as appropriate, suggest supplemental tasks/sub-tasks for incorporation into the final Section Preliminary Scope of Services.
Cost/Pricing is a factor in this selection. Proposers must complete and submit a Cost Proposal. It is the Proposer’s responsibility to state all costs to provide the services outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services. Costs shall include, but not be limited to, direct labor, overhead, fringe benefits, profit, subcontractors, other direct costs (ODC) such as materials, supplies, taxes, and travel. A Proposer’s failure to submit a Cost Proposal will deem the submittal non-responsive. Include the Cost Proposal with the Electronic Response.
The price will be evaluated in the following manner:
Example: Lowest Total Proposed Price Total % Price
Proposer’s Total Proposed Price X for Price = Score
Cost/Pricing is a factor in this selection. Proposers must complete and submit a Cost Proposal. It is the Proposer’s responsibility to state all costs to provide the services outlined in Section Preliminary Scope of Services. Costs shall include, but not be limited to, direct labor, overhead, fringe benefits, profit, subcontractors, other direct costs (ODC) such as materials, supplies, taxes, and travel. A Proposer’s failure to submit a Cost Proposal will deem the submittal non-responsive. Include the Cost Proposal with the Electronic Response.
The price will be evaluated in the following manner:
This portion of the proposal will be evaluated based on the reasonableness of the proposed costs. Costs will be evaluated as compared to costs the City or other comparable public agencies have paid for similar services and with the industry’s standard and customary costs for the services.
In this section (maximum 5 pages), provide the following:
The City reserves the right to:
It is the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure the client reference contact person is available and willing to provide a reference within the timeframe stated in this section. The client reference score/weight shall have no bearing on any other evaluation criteria.
In this section (maximum 5 pages), provide the following:
The City reserves the right to:
It is the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure the client reference contact person is available and willing to provide a reference within the timeframe stated in this section. The client reference score/weight shall have no bearing on any other evaluation criteria.
Proposers invited for the interview and oral presentations are expected to have a clear understanding of Project goals and objectives, the scope of services, the Project and City background, and the Proposer’s role. Proposers must present their Project understanding, work plan, and approach effectively for achieving the Scope of Services on time and within budget.
Proposers invited to participate in the interview and oral presentations will be evaluated on their ability to effectively communicate the project understanding, work plan and approach, and the qualifications of subcontractors and personnel. The presentations should be informative and concise.
Local Businesses and Locally Owned Businesses must submit this certification with each bid or proposal in order to receive the 2% and additional 4% preference applied during the evaluation of any competitive process for goods, supplies, equipment, materials, services, or professional services.
Local Businesses
To qualify for the 2% local business preference, a business must meet the following criteria:
To qualify for an additional 4% locally owned business preference, a business must meet the above requirements for a local business and at least 50% of the business’ owners must live in the County of Santa Cruz.
To qualify for the locally owned business preference, list all of the business’ owners and their county of residence.
In previous disasters, many organizations have responded enthusiastically to the City’s requests for supplies and services needed to protect the health, safety, and property of the Santa Cruz public. The information on this list allows us to quickly locate desperately needed resources. Because many businesses give us their nighttime phone numbers, we are able to obtain crucial supplies and services after normal business hours.
If you are interested in being a part of this list, please take a few minutes to fill out the form below, review the categories, and check any that apply.
We urge you to provide the manager’s or owner’s home address and phone number. Having information on how to contact a firm after hours greatly improves our emergency response. This information is kept confidential and used only in the event of serious life-threatening emergencies.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please make sure to reflect the option choose below in your Introduction Section Timeline by clicking on "Edit Timeline"
Local Preference does not apply to:
Every contract for services to the City for $10,000 or more is subject to the City’s Living Wage Ordinance number 2000-25.
Liquidated Damages are applicable for PW- non Construction, & Construction Projects
You will need to use a standard calculation to determine this number, based on a reasonable estimate of damages you will incur daily if the Project is delayed.
If you are soliciting for an Architectural, Engineering, or Design Services contract, you cannot include pricing as a factor.
Q (Routine vs. Emergency Inspections): Does the contract include provisions for on-call emergency inspections, or just the routine biennial inspections?
A: Section 1.2.5 Additional Services addresses emergency inspections and other items, including basis of payment.
Q (No subject): Does the City consider the bridge inspection field activities as "public work" under Labor Code Section 1720, thereby subjecting them to prevailing wage requirements?
A: Yes.
Q (No subject): Are previous inspection reports available for these bridges? If so, how recent are they?
A: There are no previous inspection reports. Plans will be available for all but one structure.
Q (No subject): Does the City have a good sense of which bridges will require in-depth inspections? If not, could proposing them as additional work be acceptable?
A: I don't anticipate that any of the bridges will require special inspections at this time.
Q (No subject): Please confirm if the bridge inspections should follow the legacy NBIS methodology or the current SNBI requirements?
A: The consultant can propose which methodology and requirements are the most applicable.
Q (Resumes): May we include full resumes of key staff in an appendix?
A: See section 3.2 Proposal Format. "Proposals should be no longer than 40 pages in length, double-sided (total 80 pages)".
Q (Section 6 Questionnaire ): Does the City want RFP respondents to include responses to Section 6 Questionnaire questions on pages separate from the sections listed in 1.2.8 Proposal Requirements? Or is it okay to include responses to the Section 6 questionnaire under for example 1.2.8a Firm Qualifications?
A: It is acceptable to include the answers in Section 1.2.8 Proposal Requirements.
Q (Standards and Requirements): Section 1.2.6 Standards and Requirements – “Inspections shall be performed in accordance with FHWA National Bridge Inspection Standards. The NBIS are very specific with regard to the qualifications of bridge inspectors.” Question: Must the inspection team fully meet the NBIS qualifications? Would inspections perfomed by an engineer licensed in the state of California be an acceptable alternative?
A: Section 1.2.6 Standards and Requirements specify several reference documents that may be applicable to the inspections. The NBIS bullet point notes "where applicable", which allows leeway on the inspector requirements. A California registered engineer with bridge inspection experience is acceptable.
Q (Basic Qualifications of Consultant ): Section 2.4 Basic Qualifications of Consultant - “Consultant must demonstrate experience in bridge inspection services on local, state and federally funded projects.” Question: This requirement sets a very high bar for the qualifications but is line with other requirements listed under Section 1.2.6. However, is it the City’s intent to limit the qualified consultants to a only those who are certified to perform Highway Bridge Inspections on State and Federal Projects and have performed Highway Bridge Inspections on State and Federal Projects?
A: See response to question #8.
Q (Bridge Inspections): Section 1.2.2 Bridge Inspections - “Perform routine and/or in-depth inspections of bicycle and pedestrian bridges”. Conduct visual inspections of all accessible structural elements.” Question: What do you mean by accessible? Gaining access to bottom (underside) of the bridges is possible but requires specialized equipment or methods. For instance Site 3 is over the mouth of the San Lorenzo River and significantly above grade. Are you envisioning the inspection team will utilize industrial rope access to perform arm-length visual inspection for all elements of the structures in the scope of this RFP? A rigorous effort such as this will significantly increase project costs for the City. If possible please clarify the extent or nature of the inspection you desire.
A: Section 1.2.2 Bridge Inspection lists the components that require inspection which are more complicated on some of the bridges. It is the responder's responsibility to ensure that each bridge is adequately inspected.
Q (Followers List): Why is the Follower's List not visible on the OpenGov posting for this solicitation?
A: The Follower's List will be made public.
Q (Cost Proposal Submittal): Section 7 of the RFP (page 13) specifies that each consultant will submit a "sealed cost proposal". Conversely, Section 3.2 (page 7) and Section 5.1 (page 11) state that "all proposals will be submitted through the OpenGov Procurement website". Could the City please clarify the following: 1. Should the cost proposal be uploaded as a separate, password-protected file to the OpenGov portal, or is it required to be delivered as a hard copy in a physical sealed envelope? 2. Currently, the "Proposal Submittals" section (Step 3) on the OpenGov portal is blank and does not provide an upload field. Is this where the cost proposal (and the main proposal) should be uploaded once the section is functional? 3. If a physical submission is required, please confirm if the delivery deadline remains May 19, 2026, at 2:00 PM. 4. If a physical submission is required, please provide the mailing address.
A: An addendum will be issued.
Q (Proposal submittal/file upload ): In the "Draft Response" response interface of the OpenGov website, we can view the navigation steps (1. Contact Info, 2. Addenda Confirmation, 3. Proposal Submittals, 4. Company Profile, and 5. Submit). However, the area under "3. Proposal Submittals" appears blank and does not provide a field or button to upload our proposal documents. Will this section will be updated to allow for file uploads? Or could you please clarify if the proposals should be submitted differently?
A: An Addendum will be issued.
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.