SLED Opportunity · FLORIDA · CITY OF PETERSBURG

    Broker Services for Florida Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits

    Issued by City of Petersburg
    cityRFPCity of PetersburgSol. 242840
    Closed
    STATUS
    Closed
    due May 12, 2026
    PUBLISHED
    Mar 26, 2026
    Posting date
    JURISDICTION
    City of
    city
    NAICS CODE
    541618
    AI-classified industry

    AI Summary

    The City of St. Petersburg seeks qualified firms to provide brokerage and advisory services for marketing and facilitating the transfer of Florida Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits related to Brownfield remediation. This RFP includes detailed evaluation criteria and submission requirements.

    Opportunity details

    Solicitation No.
    242840
    Type / RFx
    RFP
    Status
    open
    Level
    city
    Published Date
    March 26, 2026
    Due Date
    May 12, 2026
    NAICS Code
    541618AI guide
    Jurisdiction
    City of Petersburg
    State
    Florida
    Agency
    City of Petersburg

    Description

    The City of St. Petersburg (“City”) has received tax credits associated with Brownfield site remediation through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credit (VCTC) Program. The City is issuing this Request for Proposals (RFP) to solicit proposals from qualified firms to provide brokerage and/or advisory services to market, structure, and facilitate the transfer/sale of statutorily authorized Florida tax credits in a manner most advantageous to the City.

    Project Details

    • Reference ID: RFP- 26 - 164
    • Department: Finance
    • Department Head: Director (Director)

    Important Dates

    • Questions Due: 2026-04-09T16:00:00.000Z
    • Answers Posted By: 2026-04-14T19:00:00.000Z

    Meetings & Milestones

    EventDateLocation
    Evaluation/Shortlisting Meeting 2026-05-19T14:00:00.000ZOne 4th St. North St. Petersburg, FL 33701, Conference Room 600

    Addenda

    • Addendum #1 (released 2026-03-27T14:12:21.813Z) —

      Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.

    Evaluation Criteria

    • Qualifications and Experience of Firm and Staff (30 pts)

      This section evaluates the Proposer’s qualifications, relevant experience, and capacity to successfully perform the required services. Scoring will be based on the firm’s history of similar projects, technical expertise, organizational structure, key personnel credentials, and demonstrated past performance.

      Evaluators will consider:

      1. Demonstrated experience with similar tax credit transactions, including size, complexity, and program relevance.
      2. Documented performance outcomes (e.g., pricing achieved, time-to-close, successful execution).
      3. Qualifications and experience of the specific team proposed for this engagement. 
    • Project Approach (25 pts)

      This section evaluates the Proposer’s proposed methodology for delivering the services, including processes used on similar projects and the approach envisioned for this engagement. Scoring will be based on the clarity and feasibility of the project plan, schedule, key activities, deliverables, and the proposed coordination process with the City’s Project Manager. 

      Evaluators will consider the indicative timetable provided by the vendor identifying key milestones and an estimated duration to market and complete the transfer/sale of the tax credits.

    • Cost Analysis (35 pts)

      This section evaluates the Proposer's completed cost analysis and proposed fee for the project. Scoring will be based on the completeness, clarity, and reasonableness of the pricing information provided.

      Evaluators will consider:

      1. Proposed net proceeds to the City, including all fees, commissions, and transaction costs.
      2. Clarity and completeness of the net proceeds calculation (assumptions, inclusions/exclusions).
      3. Competitiveness of the fee/commission structure.
      4. Identification and mitigation of risks that could reduce net proceeds (contingencies, variable costs). 
    • Business Enterprise Program Outreach and Utilization (10 pts)

      This section evaluates the Proposer’s status as an SBE, MBE, WBE, or combination, and the firm’s demonstrated commitment to outreach, inclusion, and utilization of small and minority-owned businesses in performance of the contract. Scoring will be based on documented outreach efforts, planned mentoring and capacity-building initiatives, and processes for inclusive subcontracting. 

    Submission Requirements

    • Is the Vendor registered with the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations (Sunbiz) in accordance with Florida Statute §607.1501? (required)
    • Is the Vendor a City of St. Petersburg certified SBE? (required)

      If you have submitted an application and it is pending, please send an email to osd@stpete.org. In the subject line- provide the solicitation number and due date. 

    • Is the Vendor a City of St. Petersburg certified MWBE? (required)

      If you have submitted an application and it is pending, please send an email to osd@stpete.org. In the subject line- provide the solicitation number and due date. 

    • Address for Headquarters location. (required)
    • Address of office providing service, if different than above.
    • Signature Authority (required)

      Please provide a letter certifying who is authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of Company. 

    • Describe the nature of company’s business. (required)
    • Year the Company was Founded. (required)
    • Number of years company has operated under the current name. (Note: if the company has modified its corporate structure since its founding (e.g., from a corporation to an LLC), you may list the number of years the company was founded under the original corporate structure). (required)
    • Company’s bank of record. (required)
    • Describe any litigation that the vendor has been a party to in the last five years where it was alleged that the offeror breached a contract for similar services with a client/customer and describe any contracts for similar services that the vendor failed to complete for similar services. Describe the facts and status of any such litigation or contract. (required)

      Type N/A if not applicable.

    • Identify any government entity that has debarred or otherwise prohibited the vendor from responding to its competitive solicitations within the last five years. Describe the circumstances surrounding such debarment or other prohibition. (required)

      Type N/A if not applicable.

    • The vendor acknowledges that it has read, understands and will comply with Florida Statute §448.095 pertaining to required use of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security E-Verify system. Should the City terminate the contract with the vendor for violation of §448.095, vendor may not be awarded a contract with the City for at least one year. (required)
    • The vendor acknowledges that its quote response is subject to Public Records laws (Chapter 119, Florida Statutes). (required)
    • Will vendor allow other agencies to piggyback the contract if awarded? (required)
    • The vendor hereby makes all certifications required by Florida Statute §287.135 related to scrutinized companies. (required)
    • Is vendor required to provide any disclosures to the City regarding a foreign country of concern pursuant to Florida Statutes §286.101 (3)(a)? (required)
    • If YES, please provide the disclosure(s) in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statute §286.101 (3)(a).
    • The vendor certifies that it takes no exceptions to the agreement attached. (required)

      The City has deemed the following contract terms to be non-negotiable. Vendor is advised that if it wishes to take exception to any of the terms contained or referenced in the contract, it must explicitly identify the term and the exception in its response to the solicitation. Vendor's stated exception to a non-negotiable contract term may disqualify it from consideration: 

      1. Indemnification.
      2. Insurance coverage.
      3. Governing Law and Venue.
      4. The City will not agree to the addition of any provision requiring a dispute resolution process or method, including but not limited to binding arbitration.
      5. The City will not agree to the addition of any provision waiving any remedy available to the City in law or equity (including but limited to the right to a jury trial)
      6. The City will not agree to the addition of any provision providing for the award of attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.
      7. The City will not agree to the addition of any provision limiting the liability of Vendor to a maximum dollar amount.
    • If exceptions are taken to the attached agreement, please provide.
    • Has the vendor identified any trade secrets or confidential information in its response? (required)
    • If yes to the above question, please upload your redacted proposal here.
    • I currently have the required insurance coverage as specified in the solicitation and will be able to provide a Certificate of Insurance if awarded. (required)
    • References (required)

      Please download the below document, complete, and upload.

    • Submittal Documents (required)

      Upload all other documents relating to this solicitation. Including but not limited to proposals/statements of qualifications, applicable bonds, warranty information, etc. 

    • Living Wage Questions (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • What type of project is this? (required)
    • Is this a service contract, exceeding $200k? (required)

      Make sure this in compliance with the living wage ordinance. 

    • Is the construction project over $1M? (required)
    • Number of Awards (required)
    • Will background checks be needed? (required)
    • What type of background check? (required)
    • Will subcontractors/subconsultants be allowed? (required)
    • Will a performance and payment bond be needed? (required)

    Key dates

    1. March 26, 2026Published
    2. May 12, 2026Responses Due

    AI classification tags

    Frequently asked questions

    SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.

    SamSearch Platform

    Stop searching. Start winning.

    AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.