Active SLED Opportunity · TEXAS · TRAVIS COUNTY

    Budget Software Solution

    Issued by Travis County
    countyRFPTravis CountySol. 9028024357
    Open · 20d remaining
    DAYS TO CLOSE
    20
    due Aug 25, 2026
    PUBLISHED
    Jul 24, 2026
    Posting date
    JURISDICTION
    Travis County
    county
    NAICS CODE
    541512
    AI-classified industry

    AI Summary

    Travis County, Texas seeks proposals for a budget software solution. The RFP requires electronic or physical bid submissions by August 18, 2026, with mandatory proposal and pricing schedule documents.

    Opportunity details

    Solicitation No.
    9028024357
    Type / RFx
    RFP
    Status
    Active
    Level
    county
    Published Date
    July 24, 2026
    Due Date
    August 25, 2026
    NAICS Code
    541512AI guide
    Jurisdiction
    Travis County
    State
    Texas
    Agency
    Travis County

    Description

    N/A **Solicitation Type**: RFP - Request for Proposal (Formal) **Source ID**: PU.OTH.USA.2774764.C19583801 **Piggyback Contract**: No **Questions are submitted online**: Yes **Bid Submission Type**: Electronic or Physical Bid Submission **Solicitation Number**: 231-LC **Reference Number**: 0000425488 **Pricing**: No Pricing **Bid Documents List**: | Item Name | Description | Mandatory | Limited to 1 file | |---|---|---|---| | Proposal Without Pricing | Proposal Without Pricing | Yes | No | | Pricing Schedule | Pricing Schedule | Yes | No | **Questions and Answers**: | Question | Answer | |---|---| | Can the County please post Excel spreadsheet titled “RFP 231-LC Appendix A Requirements.xlsx” on to the documents tab of this online procurement portal? | Answered in Communication 1 | | As Travis County currently utilizes SAP ECC and plans to migrate to SAP S/4HANA. Can the County please confirm whether it is open to considering Oracle Enterprise Performance Management (Oracle EPM) as a proposed budgeting and planning solution, provided it fully meets the functional, technical, integration, and implementation requirements outlined in the RFP? Or is the County's preference limited to solutions within the SAP ecosystem? | Answered in Communication 2 | | Could you please direct me to find the Appendix A file in the bid posting? | Answered in Communication 1 | | Over the past three years, did the County or its consultants meet with vendors, attend demonstrations, conduct discovery sessions, discuss solution capabilities, or receive input used to develop the requirements? If yes, please identify the vendors involved or confirm that all material information exchanged has been disclosed equally to all respondents. | Answered in Communication 2 | | The County earmarked $400,000 in capital funding and $300,000 in operating funding for Budget Software in FY26, and $600,000 in capital funding and $300,000 in operating funding in the proposed FY27 budget. Is this the full amount available for the software, implementation, integrations, data migration, training, and ongoing support required under this RFP? If not, please provide the total funding available. | Answered in Communication 2 | | What documented data-classification analysis, risk assessment, statutory requirement, or County security policy led Travis County to require FedRAMP/GovRAMP-certified cloud providers rather than accepting TX-RAMP or equivalent independently assessed security controls? Please confirm whether current FedRAMP or GovRAMP authorization is a mandatory pass/fail requirement and, if it is not, identify exactly how non-authorized solutions will be evaluated. | Answered in Communication 2 | | Before releasing the RFP, did the County confirm that more than one FedRAMP/GovRAMP authorized vendor could deliver every mandatory requirement within the County’s available budget and timeline? If yes, how many vendors were identified? | Answered in Communication 2 | | The RFP requires vendors to complete “RFP 231-LC Appendix A Requirements.xlsx,” but that file was not included with the solicitation documents. When will the County provide it, and will the proposal deadline be extended so vendors have adequate time to review, price, and respond to the complete requirements? | Answered in Communication 2 | | Could you please direct me to find the Appendix A and Exhibit 2 file in the bid posting? | Answered in Communication 1 | | Where can I find Exhibit 2? | Answered in Communication 2 | **Addendums**: | Addendum | Date | Note | |---|---|---| | Addendum No. 1 | 07/31/2026 03:50 PM EDT | | | Addendum No. 2 | 08/04/2026 02:20 PM EDT | | **Communications**: - Communication No.2: Answered Q&A — Q&A Document 2.pdf - Communication No.1: Answered Q&As. — Q&A Document 1.pdf

    Key dates

    1. July 24, 2026Published
    2. August 25, 2026Responses Due

    AI classification tags

    Frequently asked questions

    SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.

    SamSearch Platform

    Stop searching. Start winning.

    AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.