Active SLED Opportunity · CALIFORNIA · VTA PURCHASING

    Data Warehouse Modernization Initiative

    Issued by Vta Purchasing
    localRFPVta PurchasingSol. 272133
    Open · 21d remaining
    DAYS TO CLOSE
    21
    due Jul 14, 2026
    PUBLISHED
    Jun 5, 2026
    Posting date
    JURISDICTION
    Vta Purchasing
    local
    NAICS CODE
    541512
    AI-classified industry

    AI Summary

    VTA seeks qualified firms to provide technology consulting services for data warehouse modernization, focusing on design, migration, governance, and implementation. The RFP emphasizes experience in public transit data and modern data platforms, with a preference for local firms in Santa Clara County. Proposals and cost submissions are required separately.

    Opportunity details

    Solicitation No.
    272133
    Type / RFx
    RFP
    Status
    open
    Level
    local
    Published Date
    June 5, 2026
    Due Date
    July 14, 2026
    NAICS Code
    541512AI guide
    Jurisdiction
    Vta Purchasing
    Agency
    Vta Purchasing

    Description

    VTA seeks proposals (each a "Proposal") from responsive and responsible qualified firms (each a "Proposer") to provide technology consulting services focused on data warehouse modernization.

    Project Details

    • Reference ID: S26027
    • Department: Professional Services Contracts
    • Department Head: Kathy Cheng (Professional Services Contracts Manager)

    Important Dates

    • Questions Due: 2026-06-30T21:00:00.000Z
    • Pre-Proposal Meeting: 2026-06-23T17:00:00.000Z — Microsoft Teams (Meeting Link: https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/268397032810678?p=t2RWn5xYbGoKVN0OCp)

    Evaluation Criteria

    • Qualification of the Firm (30 pts)

      The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal its qualifications to perform the Scope of Work and its experience in successful delivery and performance of comparable work on comparable projects, including demonstrated capability and experience in:
      (i)    Technical experience in performing work of a closely similar nature; record of completing work on schedule; strength and stability of the firm; Demonstrated experience delivering similar enterprise data warehouse modernization initiatives, including data warehouse design, migration, and implementation.
      (ii)   Experience in the transportation, transit, or public sector domain, including understanding of ridership data, operational systems, and transit regulatory considerations.
      (iii)   Experience working with multiple modern data platforms (e.g., Snowflake, Microsoft Fabric, Databricks), with the ability to provide tool-agnostic recommendations based on defined business and technical requirements.
      (iv)   Experience implementing governance, DevOps/CI-CD, and operational models for sustained platform management, including data governance frameworks such as cataloging, lineage, access controls, and audit mechanisms.
      (v)   Demonstrated ability to design and implement a modern data platform that supports a wide range of users and use cases through low-code/no-code capabilities, enables seamless integration with diverse data sources, and incorporates well-defined network architecture and security policies aligned with enterprise standards.
      (vi)   The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a clear, scalable, and secure target-state architecture and technical approach for the modern data warehouse platform, including data ingestion, integration, storage, modeling, orchestration, and analytics layers. The approach must explicitly identify and incorporate appropriate data integration and transformation tools and frameworks, data modeling approaches, and native platform capabilities to support an efficient, automated, and maintainable data pipeline and data warehouse.

    • Staffing and Project Organization (20 pts)

      (i)    Proposer team. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a cohesive team with a clear and effective division of responsibility between the Proposer Members (if applicable) and between the Proposer  to support successful delivery of the Scope of Work. Demonstrated experience of Proposer and/or of Proposer Members (if applicable) and the proposed  Subcontractors  working together  performing comparable work on comparable projects is preferred.
      (ii)   Key  Personnel  experience,  capability,  and  qualifications.  The  Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal the capability, experience, and qualifications of its nominated key personnel necessary to satisfy the minimum requirements for Key Personnel under the Scope of Work and to successfully deliver the Scope of Work ("Key  Personnel"). Demonstrated  experience  of  Key Personnel  successfully working together performing comparable work on comparable projects is 
      preferred.
      (iii)   Organizational and management structure. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a well-defined and appropriately-resourced organizational management structure that: (A) supports effective communication and issue resolution, (B) incorporates those Key Personnel and other personnel that bring relevant experience from comparable projects (including from the Reference Projects), best practices, and lessons learned, and allocates those Key Personnel and other personnel to those roles that enable them to utilize that experience and those best practices and lessons learned to support successful delivery of the Scope of Work, (C) demonstrates the Proposer's understanding of the Scope of Work, including the schedule for the Scope of Work, and 
      (D) demonstrates the adequacy of the labor commitment for the Scope of Work, including taking account of the requirements to scale-up and/or scale-down the labor commitment according to the phasing of the Scope of Work.

    • Work Plan / Project Understanding (30 pts)

      (i)    Project Understanding. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a clear understanding of Contract requirements and the risks, challenges, and opportunities for the Project and how, by reference to specific examples, the Proposer's experience delivering comparable work on comparable projects (including the Reference Projects) will be utilized to address those risks, challenges, and opportunities when performing the Scope of Work.
      (ii)   Work Plan. The Proposer demonstrating through its Proposal a well-defined and credible work plan for delivering the Scope of Work that: (A) aligns with the Contract requirements and Project objectives, (B) supports timely delivery of the Scope of Work in accordance with the defined milestones, (C) manages and mitigates risks to the Project, (D) establishes clear communication, coordination, and issue resolution protocols supporting productive working relationships between the Proposer and VTA, interfacing contractors and consultants, and external stakeholders, and (E) incorporates, by reference to specific examples, best practices and lessons learned from the Proposer's experience delivering comparable work on comparable projects (including the Reference Projects).

    • Local Firm Preference (10 pts)

      In accordance with VTA Administrative Code, Section 9-11, Preference for Local Firms, 5 points will be awarded to a Proposal if at least fifty percent (50%) of the dollar value of services to be rendered under that Proposal will be performed by a local firm. An additional point will be awarded for each additional ten percent (10%) of the dollar value of services to be performed by a local firm, to a maximum point award of ten percent of total evaluation points. For the purposes of this Section 3.1.2(e), local firms are those that currently have their main office or a branch office with meaningful production capability located within Santa Clara County, or those firms who, upon award of the contract by VTA, will establish such a local office. This 
      preference shall not apply when prohibited by law or regulation, or whenever its application will disqualify VTA from receiving federal funds. At the time of its Proposal submission and at VTA's request following Proposal submission, including upon or prior to Notice of Recommended Award, the Proposer must provide to VTA evidence reasonably acceptable to VTA that the local firm meets the requirements of the paragraph above.

    • Cost Proposal (10 pts)

      VTA will evaluate the reasonableness of the prices against the competitiveness of the amounts with other Proposals received and adequacy of the data submitted supporting the figures quoted. Proposals in which the costs do not reflect a reasonable relationship to the work to be conducted may be viewed as failing to comprehend the requirements of the Scope of Work, and therefore, cause for the Proposal to be deemed as being non-responsive pursuant to this RFP Section 3.1.8.

    Submission Requirements

    • PROPOSAL (without Cost form) (required)

      Refer to Section 4. Proposal Submittals and Forms of the RFP for details on response requirements that are to be submitted in this response section, and upload your COMPLETE Proposal here. Upload cost proposal separately in the next step.

      Submit the following forms as part of your Proposal:

      PROPOSAL FORM 1A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND PROPOSER GENERAL INFORMATION

      PROPOSAL FORM 3: DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS

      PROPOSAL FORM 4: LISTING OF SBE PROPOSER OR SUBCONTRACTORS

      PROPOSAL FORM 5: LITIGATION DISCLOSURE

      PROPOSAL FORM 6: GENERAL CERTIFICATIONS

      PROPOSAL FORM 7: NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION

      PROPOSAL FORM 8: REFERENCES

      PROPOSAL FORM 9: KEY PERSONNEL STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY

      PROPOSAL FORM 10: DESIGNATION OF PROPOSER'S REPRESENTATIVE

      PROPOSAL FORM 11: LOCAL FIRM CERTIFICATION

      PROPOSAL FORM 12: LEVINE ACT STATEMENT

    • Separate Cost/Price Proposal (required)

      Proposers shall submit a Cost Proposal for the services requested in this RFP.

      Submit the following forms:

      PROPOSAL FORM 1B. COST PROPOSAL

      Confirm that your fee proposal is not attached in your Proposal (on the previous step)  and is submitted separately here.

    • Bid Bond (required)

      Each bid shall be accompanied by a certified cashier’s check, or bid bond, in the amount of 10% of the total bid price, payable toSanta Clara Valley Transportation Authority, as a guarantee that the bidder, if its bid is accepted, will promptly execute the Agreement. The bidder shall guarantee the total bid price for a period of 60 days from the date of the bid opening.

      Please scan and upload a copy of your bid bond/cashier's check. Bidder must also MAIL bid guarantee with a postmarked date no later thanTuesday, July 14, 2026 addressed to:

      Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
      Leah Belete
      3331 N. First Street
      San Jose,CA
      95134

      Please have the Bidder Name, Contract Title ("Data Warehouse Modernization Initiative"), and Contract Number ("S26027") listed clearly on the outside of the envelope.

    • Contract Execution, Payment Bond, Performance Bond, and Certificate(s) of Insurance (required)

      The contract shall be executed by the successful bidder and shall be returned, together with the Payment Bond, Performance Bond and Certificate(s) of Insurance to Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority so that it is received within 14 working daysafter the bidder has received the contract for execution. Failure to do so shall be just cause for forfeiture of the proposal guaranty.

    • SB/DVBE Certification ID (Optional)

      Please type your SB/DVBE Certification ID. This will be verified by the Cal eProcure Website

    • Electronic Pricing Table (required)

      Would you like to have bidders respond to an electronic pricing table through ProcureNow?

      Choose this if:

      1. This is a quote for a finite set of goods or commodities
      2. This is a public works bid, but you want the bidder to list their total project cost here.
      3. Seeking services for hourly rate schedules
    • Bid Bond (required)

      Will this solicitation require a bid bond?

    • Separate Fee Proposal Upload (required)

      If not using the Electronic Pricing Table, do you want your bidder to separate a Price Proposal from the rest of the Response?

    • Evaluation Criteria (required)

      Would you like to define the Evaluation Criteria for this solicitation?

    Key dates

    1. June 5, 2026Published
    2. July 14, 2026Responses Due

    AI classification tags

    Frequently asked questions

    SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.

    SamSearch Platform

    Stop searching. Start winning.

    AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.