Active SLED Opportunity · TENNESSEE · WEGO PUBLIC TRANSIT
AI Summary
WeGo Public Transit seeks proposals to replace its Demand Response software system with an AI-enabled, cloud-based solution featuring dynamic optimization, mobile app, and third-party integration. The vendor will provide software, implementation, training, and support services.
WeGo Public Transit is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to replace our current Demand Response software system. WeGo will oversee the entire process. This includes selecting a vendor, managing implementation, and ensuring the system meets our operational and accessibility needs.
We are looking for a software solution that leverages artificial intelligence (AI), offers dynamic optimization, includes a mobile app for users, operates in the cloud, integrates real-time traffic data, and supports integration with third-party providers (including taxis and TNCs) in a broker-type function. The new system should provide scalable, intelligent solutions for managing paratransit services, and also commingle demand response and microtransit trips to optimize resources.
The selected vendor will be responsible for providing the software and supporting WeGo through the following tasks:
Software for Demand Response, Same day Choice program and Microtransit.
Implementation
Training and Change Management
Post-Implementation Support
How does the proposer meet the requirements of the Compliance Matrix – Dispatch & Reservations requirements and demonstrate? How does the proposer meet the requirements of the Compliance Matrix – Customer-facing functions (web/app/IVR/notifications)? How does the proposer meet the requirements of the Compliance Matrix – Reporting/NTD/TD and operational analytics? How does the proposer meet the requirements of the Productivity improvements – approach + measurability/proof? How does the proposer meet the requirements of the Accessibility – WCAG 2.1 for dispatch, reservations and customer interfaces?
What experience does the proposer have in implementing similar demand-response replacement/paratransit systems? What experience does the proposer's key personnel in the areas of PM, technical lead, and training lead? What experience does the proposer key personnel have with integrating with eligibility/ fare/3rd-party providers? What is the proposer's key personnel experience managing public transit software replacement projects? Experience evaluating or leveraging existing open contracts and ensuring compliance with internal procurement policies? Includes qualifications of key personnel, prior work with transit agencies, and understanding of ADA/FTA requirements. What is the proposer’s previous experience in projects of this nature, particularly in a public transit agency’s On-Demand software replacement and related responsibilities? What is the proposer’s recent (last five years) experience representing governmental clients, particularly transit agencies, government agency policy-making boards, and employment organizations? Did the proposer provide references specifically related to On- Demand Software replacement? Did the reference(s) indicate positive experiences with the proposer? Were the proposer’s previous projects completed on time and on budget? Does the proposing team have experience in providing all the required elements of this project? Have the members of the proposing team previously worked together to deliver a successful
Does the proposer's proposal demonstrate clarity, detail, and feasibility of the proposed approach to managing all project phases (Performance management (PM), Implementation Plan, Schedule Realism, and Training )? How did the proposer demonstrate their ability within their training approach to meet the project roles, curriculum, delivery, and materials? How does the proposer's testing approach meets the Agency needs in the following areas ( SIT/UAT/cutover/acceptance)? Does the proposal address the scope of work? Does the proposal demonstrate that the proposer will be able to deliver all the required tasks? Are the relationships among tasks and objectives understood and clearly defined? Does the proposal approach include a clear and comprehensive process for on-demand software replacement? Does the overall project approach provide solutions that are able to be implemented and are effective in real-world operations? How does the proposer management approach demonstrate and address the agency's needs in the area of cadence and risk issue control? How will it manage the performance of the demand response software replacement provided by subcontractors?
What is the vendor's preferred licensing model alignment (SaaS/on-prem/term, escalation limits), and how does the vendor's licensing model alignment align with the Agency's scope of work?
What is the vendor's operating system for MDTs & device management approach, and how will this approach create a great operating system for MDTs & device management for the Agency?
What are the vendors' optimization triggers/configurability, and how will this impact the overall success of the project?
What are the vendor's Fare management capabilities (including choice programs), and how will these capabilities create great project frequency?
What are the vendor's preferred Access-on-Demand reservation reconciliation steps (controls/auditability), and how will these steps create project success?
How does the overall proposer cost represent the best value to the Agency, along with options? Total cost of ownership (TCO) – 5-year view. How does the cost of implementation/services pricing (setup, configuration, migration) provide cost savings to this project? How do the Hardware/MDT/cellular/MDM costs provide value to this project? How does the proposer's cost for Ongoing support/maintenance/user group fees provide value to this project? How does the proposer provide Options/alternates pricing clarity? How does the proposer demonstrate their pricing transparency & completeness (no hidden fees)?
All proposals shall be accompanied by a cover letter of introduction and an executive summary of the proposal that shall not exceed ten (10) consecutively numbered (1-10) pages.
1. Qualifications, Experience, References, and Samples
1. Briefly introduce the Proposer, providing a summary of the Proposer’s administration, organization, and staffing, including multiple offices, if applicable.
2. Clearly state the contact person's title and contact information.
3. Describe the Proposer’s experience in the last five (5) years in performing services of similar size and scope.
4. Provide references for similarly successful projects from at least three governmental agencies (or regional districts), including the name of the agency, contact name, telephone, fax and email address.
This section, which shall be no longer than five (5) consecutively numbered pages (excluding team member resumes) should include a detailed discussion of the full proposal team's relevant experience, including the relationship between subconsultants and primes, how the team will be integrated to ensure a cohesive work product, and a representation of each team member’s experience and qualifications. At a minimum, this section must include:
This section should include a detailed discussion of the proposer's project approach to the project and how this approach will ensure the project's success. At a minimum, this section must include:
1. Provide your Agency's preferred licensing model alignment (SaaS/on-prem/term, escalation limits)
2. Provide your Agency's preferred Operating system for MDTs & device management approach
3. Provide your Agency's preferred Optimization triggers/configurability
4. Provide your Agency's preferred Fare management capabilities (incl. Choice programs)
5. Provide your Agency's preferred Access-on-Demand reservation reconciliation steps (controls/auditability)
Please download the document below, complete it, and upload it along with all supporting documents.
If a proposer has exceptions to the contract terms, the Scope of Work, or any other aspects of the RFP, the proposer MUST include the exceptions in this section. Proposers are advised that Nashville MTA NOT consider changes to contract terms that are raised after the proposals have been evaluated. Submissions that include statements that exceptions to contract terms and conditions will be provided if the proposer is selected for contract negotiation will be deemed non-responsive and will not be evaluated.
Nashville MTA will not consider changes to Federal Transit Administration Clauses or State of Tennessee Clauses.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
The Agency requires proposers to complete and submit with the RFP all forms indicated in the Forms section.
If a form is not applicable to the proposal or the proposing organization, please indicate not applicable and SUBMIT.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Nashville MTA reserves the right to ask questions of the proposer, investigate and require additional information as it determines necessary in its sole discretion to ensure that the regulations and the Agency’s rules are followed as it relates to DBE participation.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Please upload copies of your Insurance Certifications and any Permits that are required here.
Fare and Funding
Operational
Productivity
Statical
All proposers are required to fill out the advanced shipping notice form
Please download the documents below, complete them, and upload.
Enter a short description of the services and/or products that are being requested.
Please enter the Names and E-mail Addresses for all the members of your Evaluation Committee.
Please enter the Names and E-mail Addresses for the Non-Scoring Members of your Evaluation Committee.
Enter the length of the contract term for your solicitation.
Example: five (5) years
Enter the number of the percentage for the overall DBE participation goal.
Example: 5
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.