Active SLED Opportunity · CONNECTICUT · CITY OF NEW HAVEN
AI Summary
The City of New Haven seeks a consulting engineering firm for design and construction engineering services to improve safety along Chapel Street. The project includes traffic signal upgrades, ADA improvements, fiber-optic network installation, and safety studies. Selection is based on qualifications, experience, and technical competence.
LEGAL NOTICE: The City of New Haven is seeking Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) to engage a Consulting Engineering Firm or Consulting Team to provide Design and Construction Engineering Services for the following transportation project. Selection will be based on professional competence and experience; cost will not be an evaluation factor at this stage.
The Safe Routes for All Chapel Street Corridor project will design safety improvements along a 1.6-mile segment of Chapel Street from Ella T. Grasso Boulevard (Route 10) on the west to State Street on the east. The project is funded by the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant program and must comply with all relevant federal requirements. The project incorporates a range of safety countermeasures, including upgraded traffic signal equipment and operations (LPI, clearance intervals, etc), accessibility improvements, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), enhanced crosswalks, transit facility upgrades, bicycle facility upgrades, sidewalk replacements, ADA-compliant curb ramp upgrades, raised crosswalks, curb extensions, and conversions of select one-way streets to two-way operation. It involves the replacement and upgrade of 14 traffic signals; the scope includes six (6) full intersection signal replacements, six (6) signal upgrades, and two (2) partial signal replacements. The project will also implement a full fiber-optic communication network to integrate these signals into the City’s centralized Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS). In addition, the City is seeking Construction Engineering and Inspection services for when the project moves into construction.
Also included in the project are Supplemental Planning/Demonstration Activities. The Consulting Team will update the city’s High-Injury Network (HIN) map, originally developed in 2019 as part of the Safe Routes for All Action Plan. The existing map is based on pre-2020 data and will be enhanced using the most recent five years of crash data to better identify and prioritize corridors and intersections with high concentrations of fatal and serious injury crashes. In addition, the Consulting Team will enhance the city’s GIS tools by integrating police crash reports and narratives. This will provide deeper insights into crash patterns, contributing factors, and underlying causes, enabling more data-driven decision-making. The Consulting Team will conduct roadway safety studies using proactive safety analysis techniques, including video analytics, to identify conflict hotspots at intersections. These tools will support the development of detailed risk profiles for various roadway users and movements. By analyzing user interactions and near-miss events, the Consulting Team will improve its ability to select, implement, and evaluate targeted safety countermeasures before crashes occur.
The Consulting Team selected will be required to provide design services for the preparation of contract plans and will also be required to provide robust public engagement services, NEPA documentation, transportation planning services, survey, site and civil engineering services, traffic engineering services, construction inspection, documentation and reporting, as well as be familiar with federal requirements such as 2 CFR 200.
Firms responding to this request should be of adequate size and sufficiently staffed to perform the assignment described above.
The Consulting Team will be evaluated and selected based on design and technical competence, the capacity and capability to perform the work within the time allotted, past record of performance, past federal grant experience, and knowledge of Federal, State, and Municipal procedures, appropriately weighted in descending order of importance.
The Chapel Street corridor was selected based on a review and analysis of crash data showing it accounts for the third-highest number of fatalities, the highest number of serious injuries, the highest number of crashes across all city-owned streets, and a fatal and serious injury rate higher than any city-owned street. Additionally, Chapel Street intersects various other high-injury network corridors and is one of just two that link multiple historically disadvantaged neighborhoods of West River, Dwight and Edgewood to and through the City’s dynamic urban core.
The technical proposal will include:
The City needs you to get the Disclosure Form notarized. We are offering you a convenient way to do this online through Notary Online (https://notarylive.com) . However, you don't have to use this online service. If you do choose to use it, it will cost you $25 each time you use it for a notarization. You can explore other ways to get your document notarized if you prefer not to pay this fee, click "No".
An online notarization option will be provided for you when responding.
Important: If you don't have the document notarized, your response will be disqualified.
In essence, you must legally verify your identity and the authenticity of your signature on the document.
Important: If you don't have the document notarized, your response will be disqualified.
In essence, you must legally verify your identity and the authenticity of your signature on the document.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Statement of Qualifications:
Each solicitation response shall include a Statement of Qualifications in the format provided in this Solicitation upon stationary of the responding entity.
All questions must be answered, and the data given must be clear and comprehensive. The respondent may submit any additional information they desire.
Provide a list of at least three (3) projects of similar scale and complexity completed within the last five (5) years.
This comprehensive financial review is a necessary step for the City of New Haven to ensure the respondent possesses the financial capacity to successfully undertake and complete the proposed project. Your affirmative response confirms your understanding and willingness to comply with these requirements if requested.
Briefly describe your reason for answering no.
Please upload here
By submitting a response to this solicitation, you acknowledge and accept the terms and condition of each individual policy.
As a bidder or proposer, any document you submit to the City of New Haven may be a public record and be open for personal inspection or copying by any person. In Connecticut ‘s public records” are defined as all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any agency. Section 1-210, CT. A document is subject to personal inspection and copying unless it falls under one of the public records exemptions created under Connecticut law. Answer No if : No part of your proposal is exempt from disclosure under the Connecticut public record law.
By claiming that all or part of the bid or proposal is exempt from the public records law, the undersigned bidder or proposer agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold the City of New Haven, its officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from and against all claims arising out of a request to inspector copy the bid or proposal. The undersigned bidder or proposer agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, provide defense (including payment of attorney fees, court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses up to and including any appeal) for and defend any such claim at its sole cost and expense through counsel chosen by the City of New Haven and agrees to bear all other costs and expenses related thereto, even if they (claims, etc.) are groundless, false, or fraudulent.
The following parts of the bid or proposal submitted are exempt from disclosure under the Connecticut public records law because: (list exempt parts and legal justification - e.g., trade secret):
Upload Record Document here
Respondent expressly acknowledges that the submission of a response, purchasing agreement, or any supporting documentation shall not contain embedded hyperlinks to external terms and conditions. Any terms and conditions intended to be part of the contract must be provided in full, physical or digital text within the formal submission. Furthermore, any respondent terms that conflict with the City’s Standard Terms and Conditions shall be deemed secondary; the City’s terms shall prevail unless a specific exception is negotiated and signed by both parties."
By submitting a response to this solicitation, you acknowledge and accept this requirement as a condition of award."
For Example: "Homeland Security"
If answered yes, please attached confirmation email from Fleet, in the internal attachment section
If answered yes, please attached confirmation email from the Technology Department , in the internal attachment section of this project.
Instructions for Project Managers
Based on the information you currently have, attempt to answer this question to the best of your capability. Ultimately, purchasing will review this carefully and edit and update as needed based on your solicitation requirements.
As a standard, all activities for Construction and Service require the following:
Any Professional Services type project (usually Request for Proposals) will require the following:
For Commodity, General Liability is the minimum requirement.
This particular question is to be answered for the company (or their subcontractors) not their employees.
Please enter the specific License or Certification required to be eligible to compete on this solicitation. For example, "CPA - Certified Public Accountant."
Guidelines used to determine whether a response is good, effective, or meets expectations of the project
Evaluation factors. RFQ, criteria should shifts away from "solutions" and toward "capacity. Below is suggest criteria already created to be used or more modified. It is important that your actual evaluation of the responses is consistent with the factors and criteria you include in the RFQ document. You will be able to add detail or edit any criteria along with the point values (using a 100-point-scale) while you are editing the Evaluation Section of this project.
The determination of whether a city contract is to be submitted to the board of alders for prior approval pursuant to section 2-376 is if one of the following conditions exist:
a.
If its initial term is longer than one year, exclusive of options/renewals that are less than two years.
b.
If options/renewals on the initial term exceed two years collectively and/or consecutively, or
c.
If any options/renewals materially alter the terms or conditions of a contract in the judgment of the city purchasing agent.
The determination of whether a city contract is to be submitted to the board of alders for prior approval pursuant to section 2-376 is if one of the following conditions exist:
a.
If its initial term is longer than one year, exclusive of options/renewals that are less than two years.
b.
If options/renewals on the initial term exceed two years collectively and/or consecutively, or
c.
If any options/renewals materially alter the terms or conditions of a contract in the judgment of the city purchasing agent.
General definitions and parameters of each approach.
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.