Active SLED Opportunity · FLORIDA · CITY OF PETERSBURG
AI Summary
The City of St. Petersburg seeks proposals for a SaaS cloud-based Pension Administration and Management system to replace its legacy system. The solution must ensure accurate processing, regulatory compliance, and a quality user experience for pension stakeholders. The RFP includes detailed evaluation criteria and submission requirements.
The City of St. Petersburg is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide a Pension Administration and Management system with a fully SaaS Cloud-based solution to replace a legacy system. The proposed solution must deliver comprehensive, end‑to‑end pension administration capabilities designed to ensure accurate processing, regulatory compliance, and a high‑quality experience for members, retirees, beneficiaries, and plan sponsors.
The current system is a legacy system that integrates with Oracle Payroll for processing. The City will migrate from both of these platforms for a new Pension Administration and Management System. The City's pension payroll is three legally separate entities with unique federal ID's and plan documents.
| Event | Date | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation/Shortlisting Meeting | 2026-06-10T17:00:00.000Z | One 4th St. North St. Petersburg, FL 33701, Conference Room 800 |
Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.
Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.
Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.
Base Agreement Added
Please use the See What Changed link to view all the changes made by this addendum.
This section evaluates the Proposer’s qualifications, relevant experience, and capacity to successfully perform the required services. Scoring will be based on the firm’s history of similar projects, technical expertise, organizational structure, key personnel credentials, and demonstrated past performance.
This section evaluates the Proposer’s proposed methodology for delivering the services, including processes used on similar projects and the approach envisioned for this engagement. Scoring will be based on the clarity and feasibility of the project plan, schedule, key activities, deliverables, and the proposed coordination process with the City’s Project Manager.
This section evaluates the Proposer's completed cost analysis and proposed fee for the project. Scoring will be based on the completeness, clarity, and reasonableness of the pricing information provided.
This section evaluates the Proposer’s status as an SBE, MBE, WBE, or combination, and the firm’s demonstrated commitment to outreach, inclusion, and utilization of small and minority-owned businesses in performance of the contract. Scoring will be based on documented outreach efforts, planned mentoring and capacity-building initiatives, and processes for inclusive subcontracting.
If you have submitted an application and it is pending, please send an email to osd@stpete.org. In the subject line- provide the solicitation number and due date.
If you have submitted an application and it is pending, please send an email to osd@stpete.org. In the subject line- provide the solicitation number and due date.
Please provide a letter certifying who is authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of Company.
Type N/A if not applicable.
Type N/A if not applicable.
The City has deemed the following contract terms to be non-negotiable. Vendor is advised that if it wishes to take exception to any of the terms contained or referenced in the contract, it must explicitly identify the term and the exception in its response to the solicitation. Vendor's stated exception to a non-negotiable contract term may disqualify it from consideration:
Please download the below document, complete, and upload.
Upload all other documents relating to this solicitation. Including but not limited to proposals/statements of qualifications, applicable bonds, warranty information, etc.
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.
Make sure this in compliance with the living wage ordinance.
Q (Section 2.15 – Non‑Negotiable Contract Terms - Sample Contract?): Section 2.15 references “Non‑Negotiable Contract Terms”; however, a sample agreement or contract document is not included in the solicitation. Can the City please provide the applicable contract template or otherwise clarify which specific terms are considered non‑negotiable so proposers can appropriately assess contractual risk prior to submission? Thank you.
A: Please reference the agreement attached.
Q (Section 2.19 – Insurance Requirements - Need Detail): Section 2.19 states that insurance documentation must be provided within 10 days of award; however, it also indicates that the insurance requirements are contained in the agreement, which does not appear to be included in the solicitation. Can the City confirm whether a standard set of insurance requirements applies to this solicitation; and if so, whether those requirements can be shared prior to proposal submission? Thank you.
A: Please reference the agreement attached.
Q (Section 2.23 – Bonds - More details?): Section 2.23 references bond requirements that must be uploaded prior to the solicitation close date. Can the City please clarify the type of bond(s) required (i.e. performance bond); the required bond amount or percentage; and whether a commitment letter from a surety is acceptable in lieu of an executed bond at the proposal stage?
A: There are no bonds required on this solicitation.
Q (Business Enterprise Program Outreach and Utilization - Clarification Needed): Under Section 5, Evaluation Criteria No. 4 references Business Enterprise Program Outreach and Utilization. Additionally, the attached Subcontractor Utilization Plan indicates (third paragraph) that a utilization plan is not required as a condition of contract award. Can the City please clarify whether proposers without subcontracting opportunities may still be considered responsive and eligible for full points under this criterion?
A: Vendor's will still be considered responsive without subcontracting opportunities as it is not a condition of award. Points given to each vendor is determined by the evaluation committee.
Q ("Responsible and Responsive Construction Bid" Document - Required?): Please confirm that the above-listed document is or is not required to be submitted for this project.
A: Correct. Please disregard this as it has been deleted from the vendor questionnare.
Q (Base Agreement): Is the City open to reviewing and using the vendor's contract? Using the City's contract would result in significant time and effort to negotiate and it adds provisions that are not beneficial to both parties. The vendor's contract would be negotiable, but because it is tailored to the specific products and services that are being proposed, it will be a more concise contract. Thank you.
A: The City will be proceeding with its standard contract format as the basis for negotiation. While we understand your contract is tailored to the products and services being proposed, the City's agreement ensures consistency with our required terms and protections. We are happy to work with you through the negotiation process to address any provisions that may require discussion.
SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.
SamSearch Platform
AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.