SLED Opportunity · CALIFORNIA · SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    RFP No. 27-01 Online English Learner Instructional Software Platform

    Issued by San Bernardino City Unified School District
    educationRFPSan Bernardino City Unified School DistrictSol. 277821
    Closed
    STATUS
    Closed
    due Aug 5, 2026
    PUBLISHED
    Jul 20, 2026
    Posting date
    JURISDICTION
    San Bernardino
    education
    NAICS CODE
    511210
    AI-classified industry

    AI Summary

    San Bernardino City Unified School District seeks proposals for an online instructional software platform to support English Learners TK-6. The platform must align with California standards, provide oral language development, ELPAC preparation, predictive analytics, SEL integration, and comply with data privacy laws. Proposals due August 5, 2026.

    Opportunity details

    Solicitation No.
    277821
    Type / RFx
    RFP
    Status
    open
    Level
    education
    Published Date
    July 20, 2026
    Due Date
    August 5, 2026
    NAICS Code
    511210AI guide
    Agency
    San Bernardino City Unified School District

    Description

    Board of Education of the San Bernardino City Unified School District will receive sealed proposals for RFP No. 27-01 Online English Learner Instructional Software Platform, under RFP No. 27-01 Online English Learner Instructional Software Platform in accordance with the attached specifications, through the Procurement Portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/sbcusd?status=all , no later than 1:00 pm on Wednesday, August 5, 2026.

    Background

    The San Bernardino City Unified School District (SBCUSD) is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide an online instructional software platform specifically designed to support English Learners (ELs) in Transitional Kindergarten through Grade 6. The platform must provide comprehensive support for Integrated and Designated English Language Development (ELD), supplement classroom instruction aligned to the California English Language Development (CA ELD) Framework, and prepare students for success on the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC).

    Project Details

    • Reference ID: RFP No. 27-01 Online English Learner Instructional Software Platform
    • Department: Purchasing Department
    • Department Head: Laura Cardenas (Purchasing Services Director)

    Evaluation Criteria

    • Notice Inviting Proposals

      All Proposers are invited to submit a proposal in accordance with the terms and conditions stated in the Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide an online instructional software platform specifically designed to support English Learners (ELs) in Transitional Kindergarten through Grade 6. A copy of the RFP documents can be downloaded by accessing the District’s web site at: https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/sbcusd?status=all

      Proposers are required to be registered or register for an account via the District’s e-Procurement portal hosted by OpenGov.

      The District reserves the right to amend the RFP documents at any time. Addenda providing clarification or corrections will be done formally through posting on the District’s web site OpenGov procurement portal. Once a Proposer has completed registration, addenda email notifications can be received after clicking the “Follow” button on this project. It is the sole responsibility of each Proposer to periodically check OpenGov for any addenda.

       

    • Oral Presentations

      The District may, at its sole discretion, shortlist selected Proposers for virtual or in-person presentations. The proposer should be prepared to present such information in order that the Committee can effectively and objectively analyze all documentation proposed to provide Inventory Services . Proposers invited for oral presentations must be represented by the individual who will be the prime contact person assigned to the District, and other key team members. A Firm’s inability to respond to any request for clarification and/or oral presentation may be cause for disqualification. Upon conclusion of the proposal evaluation process, a Notification of Intend to Award will be sent to the company or companies selected. Award shall be made to the qualified Proposer(s) whose proposal is determined will provide the best service at the most economical cost to the school District.

    • Request for Proposals (RFP) 27-01 Online English Learner Instructional Software Platform Transitional Kindergarten through Grade 6

      1. Purpose

      The San Bernardino City Unified School District (SBCUSD) is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide an online instructional software platform specifically designed to support English Learners (ELs) in Transitional Kindergarten through Grade 6. The platform must provide comprehensive support for Integrated and Designated English Language Development (ELD), supplement classroom instruction aligned to the California English Language Development (CA ELD) Framework, and prepare students for success on the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC).

       

      The District seeks a research-based, standards-aligned digital language development solution that prioritizes active oral language production, meaningful interaction, differentiated instruction, and measurable language growth.

       

      2. Scope of Services

      The selected vendor shall provide a comprehensive online instructional platform that includes curriculum, assessments, analytics, professional learning, technical support, and implementation services for TK–6 English Learners.

       

      The platform must include, but is not limited to, the following components and capabilities:

      • Instructional Requirements

      A. Oral Language Development and Active Student Production

      The instructional platform must:

      • Be specifically designed for English Learners in Transitional Kindergarten through Grade 6.

      • Provide active student oral language production.

      • Align with the California ELD Framework’s emphasis on meaningful interaction, collaborative conversations, and productive language use.

      • Facilitate authentic student speaking opportunities.

      • Include structured speaking practice that develops:

        • Listening comprehension

        • Academic vocabulary

        • Oral fluency

        • Sentence formation

        • Language complexity

        • Pronunciation and articulation

        • Academic discourse

      • Provide opportunities for students to:

        • Record spoken responses

        • Engage in repeated oral rehearsal

        • Participate in interactive speaking tasks

        • Practice conversational and academic language functions

      • Include adaptive speech-recognition or voice-capture technology that supports oral language analysis and feedback.

       

      B. California Standards Alignment

      The instructional platform must align with:

      • California English Language Development (CA ELD) Standards

      • California Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

      • Integrated and Designated ELD instructional models

      • ELPAC performance expectations and proficiency descriptors

      The vendor must provide documentation demonstrating standards alignment.

       

      C. ELPAC Preparation and Practice

      The platform must provide embedded ELPAC preparation resources, including:

      • Practice opportunities aligned to all ELPAC domains:

        • Listening

        • Speaking

        • Reading

        • Writing

      • Practice items that mirror the structure and rigor of the Summative and Initial ELPAC

      • Constructed-response speaking activities aligned to ELPAC rubrics

      • Performance-based tasks that simulate authentic ELPAC testing experiences

      • Reporting tools that identify student readiness and instructional gaps related to ELPAC performance levels

       

      3. Predictive Analytics and Assessment Capabilities

      The platform must include a robust predictive analytics suite capable of evaluating spoken English performance through two primary dimensions:

      A. Language Complexity

      The analytics engine must evaluate and report on:

      • Vocabulary sophistication

      • Sentence complexity

      • Grammatical development

      • Academic language usage

      • Language expansion and elaboration

      • Progression across English proficiency levels

      B. Production Accuracy

      The analytics engine must evaluate and report on:

      • Pronunciation accuracy

      • Fluency

      • Syntax and grammar accuracy

      • Speech intelligibility

      • Appropriate language conventions

      • Oral language proficiency growth

      The platform should provide:

      • Real-time or near real-time feedback

      • Student growth tracking

      • Predictive indicators of English language proficiency development

      • Teacher dashboards with actionable instructional recommendations

      • Site and district-level reporting capabilities

      • Exportable data reports

      • Integration capabilities with district data systems when applicable

       

      4. Integrated Language Development and Character-Based Social-Emotional Learning

      The platform must integrate language development with character-based social-emotional learning (SEL).

      Instructional content should include:

      • Age-appropriate SEL themes and competencies

      • Opportunities for students to practice language through:

        • Collaboration

        • Empathy

        • Self-awareness

        • Responsible decision-making

        • Relationship skills

      • Interactive scenarios and discussion prompts that support both language acquisition and social-emotional growth

      • Culturally responsive and inclusive content that reflects diverse student backgrounds and experiences

      Preference may be given to programs that intentionally embed SEL instruction into oral language development activities.

       

      5. Differentiated Instruction and Newcomer Support

      The platform must provide differentiated instructional pathways for students at varying levels of English proficiency, including:

      A. Newcomer Supports

      • Foundational English acquisition pathways for newcomer students

      • Visual scaffolds and language supports

      • Primary language supports when appropriate

      • Survival and school-based vocabulary instruction

      • Structured oral language routines for beginning proficiency levels

      B. Early Fluency and Advanced Supports

      • Instructional pathways for students transitioning toward fluency

      • Academic discourse development

      • Complex language production opportunities

      • Extended speaking and writing tasks

      • Progress monitoring tied to proficiency advancement

      The platform must adapt instruction based on student performance and proficiency data.

       

      6. Teacher Tools and Instructional Supports

      The platform must provide educators with:

      • Teacher dashboards and student monitoring tools

      • Standards-aligned lesson resources

      • Small-group instructional recommendations

      • Progress monitoring reports

      • Intervention recommendations

      • Ability to assign differentiated lessons and activities

      • Classroom, school, and district-level reporting

      • User-friendly administrative controls

      The vendor shall provide onboarding and ongoing professional learning for teachers and administrators.

       

      7. Technical, Accessibility, and State Compliance Requirements

      The platform must:

      • Be web-based and compatible with district-supported devices

      • Support major web browsers and operating systems

      • Be accessible for students with disabilities

      • Comply with applicable accessibility standards, including WCAG 2.1

      • Comply with all applicable student data privacy laws, including:

        • FERPA

        • COPPA

        • California student data privacy requirements

      • Provide secure data storage and encryption protocols

      • Include single sign-on (SSO) capabilities if available

      The proposed instructional software platform must also:

      • Be approved and included on the California Department of Education’s CITE (California Integrated Technology Exchange) whitelist

      • Provide evidence of current CITE whitelist status

      • Provide signed Student Data Privacy Agreements (SDPA), if applicable

      • Demonstrate compliance with all applicable California student data privacy and cybersecurity requirements

      Preference may be given to vendors with established implementation experience within California public school districts and existing CITE-approved integrations.

       

      8. Vendor Qualifications

      Vendors shall demonstrate:

      • Experience providing instructional software solutions for English Learners in K–6 settings

      • Evidence of effectiveness and measurable student outcomes

      • Research basis supporting oral language development methodologies

      • Experience implementing solutions aligned to the California ELD Framework and ELPAC

      • Capacity to provide implementation support, training, and technical assistance

      Preference may be given to vendors with demonstrated success in California public school districts.

       

      9. Deliverables

      The selected vendor shall provide:

      • Full access to the instructional software platform

      • Student and teacher user accounts

      • Initial implementation support

      • Professional development and training sessions

      • Ongoing technical support

      • Usage and performance analytics

      • Reporting and progress-monitoring tools

      • Documentation for standards alignment and privacy compliance

       

      10. Evaluation Criteria

      Proposals may be evaluated based on, but not limited to:

      • Alignment to California ELD Standards and ELPAC

      • Strength of oral language development features

      • Quality of predictive analytics and assessment tools

      • Differentiation and newcomer supports

      • Integration of SEL competencies

      • Ease of implementation and usability

      • Reporting and data capabilities

      • Vendor experience and references

      • CITE whitelist approval and demonstrated compliance with California student data privacy standards

      • Cost effectiveness

      • Evidence of student outcomes and efficacy

    • Notice Inviting Proposals

      NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that that the San Bernardino City Unified School District of San Bernardino County, State of California, acting through its Governing Board, hereafter referred to as the “District”, is soliciting electronic proposal submittals through its OpenGov e-Procurement web portal in response to RFP No. 27-01 Online English Learner Instructional Software Platform  

      Vendors who are desirous of securing a copy of the RFP documents may do so by logging into the District’s website at: https://sbcusd.com/bidpostings.

      RFP responses must conform and be responsive in accordance with the RFP Documents posted through the District’s “OpenGov” website portal. Proposals must be submitted electronically up to but not later than 1:00 pm on Wednesday, August 5, 2026.

      Contract award is contingent upon availability of funds. Local, Minority and Disabled Veterans Businesses are specifically encouraged to respond. The District reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals, and to accept or reject any item, to withdraw a line item or entire RFP, and to waive any irregularities or informalities in the Bid document(s). The District may award any, all, or none of this RFP. 

      By: Laura Cardenas, Director

      1st Publication: July 20, 2026

      2nd Publication: July 27, 2026

      Request for Clarification: July 31, 2026 at 1:00 p.m.

      Virtual Public Proposal Opening: 1:00 pm on Wednesday, August 5, 2026 

      https://meet.google.com/jue-wqxr-efz

      Note: Late entry will not be permitted. 

    • Proposal Evaluation Criteria

      During the evaluation period, the District reserves the right to conduct on District site, telephone or email conversations with Proposer to clarify proposals, competitively negotiate, ask questions or obtain additional information. To Clarify: Any and all communication/requests for clarification will come directly from the Purchasing Department.

      The criteria listed below are not necessarily an all-inclusive list. While price will be the most heavily weighted criteria, the order of appearance is not intended to indicate relevance of importance. Once a Firm has been found responsive to the RFP requirements, a determination of award will be made based on the following considerations:

      Criteria Points Best Value Pricing - Fee Schedule per the requirements of the RFP

      Cost of Services (including annual renewal, hosting fees, data integration fees, software maintenance fees, support and training, all other fees): 40 points

      Responses to Scope of Work and Supplemental Questionnaire: 25 points

      Firm’s expertise, background, personnel qualifications, and experience with School Districts similar in size and scope to SBCUSD: 15 points

      Training and Support: 10 points

      Proposal Format, Organization, and Clarity: 5 points

      Acceptance of District Contract/T&C’s: 5 points

       

      Total Points: 100

    • Contents of RFP Proposal

      In order that the District’s Selection Committee can systematically and more effectively evaluate each proposal, the following format is requested: Each proposal should address the following items in the order listed below. Be sure to include information on all items requested in the RFP document. The proposal response should demonstrate the qualifications, competence and capacity of the Firm as well as specify Proposers’ approach in conformity with all federal, state, local, and District requirements:

    • Acceptance

      The District reserves the right to reject any and all RFP responses; to waive any irregularities or informalities in any proposal; and to accept or reject any items in the proposal.

    • Proposal Evaluation Process

      The District will evaluate proposals using a phased evaluation process designed to ensure that technical merit is evaluated independently from cost.

      Phase 1 – Technical Evaluation

      The evaluation committee will review and score each written proposal based solely on the published technical evaluation criteria. Cost proposals will remain sealed and will not be reviewed during this phase.

      Following the technical evaluation, the District may establish a shortlist of the highest-ranked proposers.

      Phase 2 – Additional Evaluation (If Required)

      If the District determines additional information is necessary to distinguish among the highest-ranked proposers, the District may, at its sole discretion, conduct presentations, demonstrations, interviews, or any combination thereof. If presentations are conducted, cost proposals will remain sealed until the completion of all technical evaluations.

      Upon completion of the technical evaluation process, including any presentations or demonstrations, the District will open and evaluate the sealed cost proposals and check references for the shortlisted proposers. Final scores will then be calculated using the published evaluation criteria.

      The District reserves the right to waive presentations, demonstrations, interviews, or reference checks and make an award based solely on the written proposals and cost proposals.

       

    • RFP Anticipated Timelines

      ● Closing Date for RFP Questions July 31, 2026 1:00 P.M.

      ● Proposal Due Date August 5, 2026 at 1:00 P.M.

      ● Anticipated Presentation Date (if conducted) August, 2026

      ● Anticipated Notice of Intent to Award August, 2026

    • Proposal Due Date & Opening

      The RFP must be received on or before the time indicated in the Notice Inviting Proposals. System will not allow bids to be uploaded after the closing date and time.  A Virtual RFP opening will be conducted on the RFP due date through the link provided in the Notice Inviting Proposals – Late entry will not be permitted.  Any proposal may be withdrawn by the bidder by selecting the “Unsubmit Proposal” button at anytime prior to the scheduled closing time for receipt of proposals.

      This RFP requires sealed pricing until after the evaluation process is completed; therefore, the public opening will disclose only the names of the proposers/firms.  Note: After the public bid opening, the contents of any proposal shall not be disclosed or made available to competing entities during the evaluation process.

      It is the Vendor’s sole responsibility to ensure they have given themselves enough time to upload all required documents and answer all questions prior to the closing date and time of the RFP. Should the time expire prior to the completion of the submittal, the bid will not be accepted.

      Should issues arise during the online submittal, it is imperative that the Vendor utilize the blue chat icon on the lower right-hand side of the OpenGov website. The chat icon is located on every page visited on the OpenGov website. Do not wait until the last minute to submit or ask for assistance as staff may not be readily available.



       

    • GENERAL BACKGROUND ON THE DISTRICT:

      The San Bernardino City Unified School District (SBCUSD) is the eighth-largest public school District in California with an average enrollment of about 44,000 students. SBCUSD encompasses 105 square miles in the center of San Bernardino County and operates 49 elementary schools, 11 middle schools, 9 high schools, a special education center, preschools at many school sites, a virtual academy, and an adult school. For additional information on the District visit San Bernardino City Unified School District website at www.sbcusd.com.

       

       

       

    • Questions, Addenda and Requests for Clarification

      All questions or requests for clarification regarding this RFP are to be submitted via the OpenGov Question/Answer tab. Questions and/or requests for clarifications must be submitted no later than July 31, 2026, 1:00P.M. to be considered. Responses to questions, changes to the RFP/Addenda, and Proposer requests for clarification will be posted on the OpenGov Addenda/Notices tab. All “Followers” of the project will receive email notifications when questions/answers are posted or when addenda/notifications are uploaded. Ultimately, it is the sole responsibility of all Proposers to periodically check the web site for any addenda postings.

      All communication regarding this RFP solicitation shall be conducted through the District’s on-line bid portal “OpenGov”. Contact with any District employee, officer, agent, or consultant, other than a member of the District’s Purchasing Department is grounds for disqualification/proposal rejection. If a Proposer discovers any ambiguity or error such as a conflict, discrepancy, omission, or other errors in the RFP documents, Proposer shall immediately notify the District via the OpenGov Question/Answer tab, not later than July 31, 2026, 1:00P.M.

       

    • A. Cover Letter/Letter of Interest

      Include a cover letter stating the eligibility of the Proposer to respond to this RFP, a brief description of the Firm and statement of interest.

    • PURPOSE OF THE RFP

      PURPOSE: San Bernardino City Unified School District’s (SBCUSD) is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide an online instructional software platform specifically designed to support English Learners (ELs) in Transitional Kindergarten through Grade 6. The platform must provide comprehensive support for Integrated and Designated English Language Development (ELD), supplement classroom instruction aligned to the California English Language Development (CA ELD) Framework, and prepare students for success on the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC).



    • RFP Proposal Form

      By submitting an online proposal, Proposer warrants that the individual is duly authorized to sign or enter into a contract on behalf of the proposer.

    • RFP Modifications/Qualifications by Proposer

      The full and complete RFP response requirements shall remain constant regardless of any other products and services, or approach to the solution the Proposer may offer in the RFP response. An RFP response to any specific item of this RFP with terms such as “negotiable”, “will negotiate” or similar, may be considered non-responsive to that specific item. Partial responses, changes, additions, deletions, or exceptions to this RFP by the Proposer, which are not specifically called for in the RFP documents, may result in the District’s rejection of the RFP response.

    • B. Table of Contents

      The Table of Contents shall reflect the order stated herein and shall include section titles and page numbers.

    • Failure to Provide Requested Information

      Failure of a Proposer to provide any required documentation or information requested in this package may result in rejection of their proposal.

    • IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL

      The District reserves the right to amend the RFP documents at any time. Addenda providing clarification or corrections will be done formally through posting on the District’s web site OpenGov procurement portal. Once a Proposer has completed registration, addenda email notifications can be received after clicking the “Follow” button on this project. It is the sole responsibility of each Proposer to periodically check OpenGov for any addenda.

    • C. Description of Company

      Include a description of qualifications. Include information regarding the size of the company, location, nature of work performed, and years in this particular business. The Proposer shall provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of the District as defined by generally accepted standards.

    • Legal Requirements

      All Proposers are required to comply with and be bound by all applicable provisions of laws of the State of California whether or not required herein.

    • D. Organizational Chart

      Line out your organizational structure. Make sure lines of supervision are clearly identified for all roles throughout the organization.

    • Award of RFP

      This RFP implies no obligation to purchase services. The District reserves the right to award its total requirements to one Proposer or to apportion those requirements among several Proposers as the District may deem to be in its best interests.

    • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS: 

      Proposal Due Date & Opening- The RFP must be received on or before the time indicated in the Notice Inviting Proposals. System will not allow bids to be uploaded after the closing date and time. A Virtual RFP opening will be conducted on the RFP due date through the link provided in the Notice Inviting Proposals. Late entry will not be permitted.

      It is the Proposer’s sole responsibility to ensure they have given themselves enough time to upload all required documents and answer all questions prior to the closing date and time of the RFP. Should the time expire prior to the completion of the submittal, the bid will not be accepted.

      Should issues arise during the online submittal, it is imperative that the Proposer utilize the blue chat icon on the lower right-hand side of the OpenGov website. The chat icon is located on every page visited on the OpenGov website. Do not wait until the last minute to submit or ask for assistance as staff may not be readily available.

      This RFP requires sealed pricing until after the evaluation process is completed; therefore, the public opening will disclose only the names of the Proposers/firms. Note: After the public bid opening, the contents of any proposal shall not be disclosed or made available to competing entities during the evaluation process. 

      RFP Proposal Form- By submitting an online proposal, Proposer warrants that the individual is duly authorized to sign or enter into a contract on behalf of the proposer. A Virtual Proposal opening will be conducted on the RFP due date August 5, 2026, at 1:00P.M. through Google Meets Bid Opening: https://meet.google.com/jue-wqxr-efz 

       

    • Communication of Award

      RFP awards made by the Board of Education shall not become binding upon the District until communicated in writing to the successful Proposer by the Purchasing Department.

    • E. Capacity and Methodology

      Describe the approach to provide services and fulfill the requirements and expectations of the District and this RFP. Use this section to address the ability of your company to undertake and accomplish the required scope of service while meeting all deadlines.

    • Alternate Sources

      Nothing in this agreement shall prohibit the District from acquiring the same type or equivalent services from other sources, when deemed to be in the best interest of the District.

    • F. Experience and References

      Description of past performances of similar service and related experience. The Proposer is required to submit a list of school Districts or County offices of education for which services have been performed in the last five (5) years. Please identify Districts that are of the approximate size of the District. The list shall include the (1) number of students, (2) date services were performed, (3) District name, (4) District contact name, phone number, and email address. If applicable, specify any services that may have been provided for the District previously. State the scope and size of each service, and the beginning and ending dates of services. Proposer Questionnaire - Each Proposer must completely answer the questions of this document.

    • G. Best Value Commitment

      Describe the Proposer’s philosophy and approach for meeting the District’s objective as it relates to student success and academic achievement.

    • Specifications

      The District shall be the sole judge as to whether the Proposer’s proposal meets the District’s requirements and specifications.

    • H. Certifications and Attachments

      Complete and return the attached certifications and attachments to this RFP.

      In addition to the above, at a minimum, the following documents will be required of the successful Proposer(s):

      • Proposer Supplemental Questionnaire, submit with proposal

      • Workers’ Compensation Form, submit with proposal

      • Non-Collusion Affidavit, submit with proposal

      • District’s Vendor Application, submit with proposal

      • W-9 Tax Form, submit with proposal

      • Equal Opportunity Certification, submit with proposal

      • Debarment, Suspension & Exclusion Certification, submit with proposal

      • EDGAR Federal Funding Contract Compliance Form, submit with proposal

      • Iran Contracting Act Certification, submit with proposal

      • Russian Sanctions Certification, submit with proposal

      • FERPA Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act Compliance Form, submit with proposal

      • Conflict of Interest Form, submit with proposal

      • Data Privacy Agreement, submit with proposal

      • Signed District Agreement, upon award

      • Proof of DOJ Fingerprinting clearance of Proposer’s employees, upon award

      • Insurance Certificates w/District listed as additional insured, upon award

    • Funds

      Purchase is contingent upon availability of funds.

    • Term

      The initial term of the Agreement shall be for one (1) year from the Board of Education approval but may be extended for four (4) additional successive one-year extensions, at the sole discretion of the District, not to exceed an accumulative total of five (5) years. Pricing shall be held firm for the duration of the contract.

    • Payment and Invoicing

      The Proposer(s) will make no separate invoicing and will receive no separate payment for activities performed outside of the Agreement and Scope of Work which shall be in accordance with the specifications called out in this RFP.

    • RFP Withdrawal

      Any Proposal may be withdrawn by the Proposer by selecting the “Unsubmit Proposal” button at any time prior to the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids.

      No Proposer may withdraw their proposal for a period of ninety (90) days after the RFP opening.

    • Experience

      The Proposer, by submitting a RFP, indicates that they have the ability, fitness and expertise to fulfill the terms and conditions of the RFP, and has been successful in services associated with this RFP for a period of at least (5) years.

    • Debarment, Suspension & Exclusion

      The successful Firm(s) shall certify that the Firm is presently not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in the transaction by any Federal Department Agency. It further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause without modification in all lower tier transactions, solicitations, proposals, contracts and subcontracts. Where the Proposer or any lower tier participant is unable to certify to this statement, it shall attach an explanation to this proposal. (See Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Form).

    • Covenant Against Gratuities

      The Proposer warrants that no gratuities (in the form of entertainment, gifts, or otherwise) were offered or given by the Proposer or any other agent or representative of the Proposer, to any officer or employee of the District with a view toward securing the resultant contract or securing favorable treatment with respect to any determinations concerning the award of the RFP. For breach or violation of this provision, the District shall have the right to terminate any negotiation or the resultant contract, either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by the District in procuring on the open market any items which Proposer agreed to supply shall be borne and paid for by the Proposer. The rights and remedies of the District provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by the law.

    • Contract Termination- Default

      In addition to any other rights of termination or any other remedies available at law or in equity, including but not limited to, liquidated damages, if District determines that a default or violation under the contract has occurred, it shall provide written notice to the Proposer describing the default or violation and it shall require the default or violation to be cured within five (5) business days. If the default or violation is not cured within that five (5) day period, the District may exercise its right to terminate the contract. In the event of a termination, District shall send a notice of termination in any manner acceptable as described in Notices, to the Proposer declaring the contract to be terminated as of the date provided in the notice.

    • Unsatisfactory Performance

      If, at any time during the performance of the contract it is determined that Proposer’s Services are unsatisfactory, the District shall provide written notice to the Proposer describing the unsatisfactory performance and a reasonable cure period. If the performance remains unsatisfactory at the end of the cure period, the District shall provide notice to the Proposer and the District shall have the right to terminate the contract as may be stated in the notice. In the event of a termination, the District is obligated to make payments only for services rendered up to the notice of termination.

    • Convenience

      In addition to any other termination conditions, the District may terminate this contract, in whole or in part, for any reason whatsoever. The District will give 30 days’ advance written notice.

    • Re-Procurement Clause

      In the event the Contractor fails to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including but not limited to failure to deliver goods or services as specified, the District reserves the right to procure the required goods or services from an alternate source. The Contractor shall be responsible for any cost difference incurred by the District due to such re-procurement, including administrative and operational expenses. The District may deduct such costs from any amounts due to the Contractor or pursue reimbursement through other legal means.

    • Examination and Audit of Work/Service

      The District reserves the right, at all times, to review the Proposer’s records as well as observing work performance to determine the Proposer’s conformance with the agreement.

      Any failure of the District during the progress of work to discover work not in accordance with the agreement shall not be deemed an acceptance thereof, nor a waiver of defects therein; and no payments by the District shall be construed to be an acceptance of work which is not strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

    • Audit Records

      The Proposer shall keep, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, books, statements, accounts and records pertaining to this Agreement. The Proposer will preserve the books, statements, accounts and records for a period of four (4) years after the last day of the transition period following the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

    • Access

      For the purposes of such audits, the Proposer shall provide to the District (and its designees) access to the part of any facility at which the Proposer is providing the services, to Proposer personnel and to data and records relating to the services. The Proposer shall provide reasonable assistance during the audit and will cooperate reasonably with the District in connection with audit functions and with regard to examinations by regulatory authorities. The District’s auditors shall comply with the Proposer’s reasonable security measures.

    • Compliance With Laws

      In connection with the furnishings of services or performance of work under this RFP, the Proposer agrees to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act, Equal Opportunity Employment Act, and all other applicable Federal and State laws, regulations and executive orders to the extent that the same may be applicable.

    • Proof of Insurance

      The Provider shall not commence work or allow any work to be done under this contract until all required insurance and certificates have been delivered in duplicate to and approved by the District. District shall be named as a co-insured in all said insurance policies. Certificates and insurance policies shall include the following clause:

      "This policy shall not be canceled or reduced in required limits of liability or amount of insurance until notice has been mailed to the District stating the date of cancellation or reduction. Date of cancellation or reduction may not be less than thirty (30) days after the date of mailing notice."

      "Certificates of insurance shall state in particular those insured, extent of insurance, location, and operation to which insurance applies, expiration date, and cancellation and reduction notice."

    • Insurance Requirements

      COMMERCIAL OR COMPREHENSIVE AND GENERAL LIABILITY: Insurance which shall include Contractual Liability, Products and Completed Operations coverages, Bodily Injury and Property Damage (including Fire Legal Liability) Liability insurance with combined single limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and if written on an Aggregate basis, $2,000,000 Aggregate limit (CG 0001).

      PROFESSIONAL ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: Not less than $1,000,000 per Claim/$2,000,000 Aggregate. (5-year discovery and reporting tail period coverage). Certificate of Insurance only required.

      CYBER SECURITY AND PRIVACY LIABILITY: Liability arising from the theft, dissemination and/or use of confidential information, including but not limited to, personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), security codes, access codes, passwords, etc. Cyber Security and Privacy Liability insurance should include: Notification costs, crisis management costs, and regulatory fines, and defense costs; Network security liability arising from unauthorized access to, use of or tampering with computer systems, including hacker attacks with combines single limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and if written on an aggregate basis, $2,000,000 aggregate limit (CG 0001).

      WORKER’S COMPENSATION: As required under the California Labor Code, and Employers Liability Insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident/injury/disease.

      All insurances shall be with a California Admitted insurer, with a rating of A or better, as rated by the current edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey 08858 and authorized to conduct business in the State of California.

      Please Note: The District is aware the above listed insurance requirements may increase the cost of the Proposer’s proposal. All proposed costs should be inclusive of these requirements.

    • Hold Harmless

      The proposer agrees to and does hereby indemnify and hold harmless the District, its officers, agents, and employees from every claim or demand made and every liability, loss, damage, or expense of any nature whatsoever, which may be incurred by reason of:

      A. Liability for damages for (1) death or bodily injury to persons, (2) injury to property, or (3) any other loss, damage, or expense arising under either (1) or (2) above, sustained by the proposer and any person, firm, or corporation employed by the proposer upon or in connection with the work called for in this agreement except for liability for damages referred to above which results from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the District, its officers, employees, agents, or independent contractors who are directly employed by the District or for defect in design furnished by such persons.

      B. Any injury to or death of persons or damage to property sustained by any person, firm, or corporation, including the District, arising out of or in any way connected with the work covered by this agreement, whether said injury or damage occurs either on or off school District property, except for liability for damages which result from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the District, its officers, employees, agents, or independent contractors who are directly employed by the District, or for defects in design furnished by such persons.

      C. The provider, at his own expense, cost, and risk, shall defend any and all actions, suits, or other proceeding that may be brought or instituted against the District, its officers, agents, or employees on any such claim, demand, or liability and shall pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the District, its officers, agents, or employees in any action, suit, or other proceeding as a result thereof.

    • Piggybackable RFP

      In accordance with Public Contract Code Section §20118, other school districts in the State of California may purchase under the same terms and conditions of this bid if it is determined to be in their best interest.   If so, the San Bernardino City Unified School District waives its right and prefers that each school district work directly with the successful bidder. Sales to the other district will be made at the discretion of the successful bidder.

    • Bid Protest

      Proposers may protest a contract award if he/she believes that the award was inconsistent with Board policy or the bid/RFP specifications or was not in compliance with law. The protest must be filed in writing with the Superintendent or designee within five working days after receipt of notification of the contract award. The Proposer shall submit all documents supporting or justifying the protest. A Proposer’s failure to timely file a protest shall constitute a waiver of his/her right to protest the award of the contract.

      The Proposer may appeal the Superintendent or designee’s decision to the Board. The Superintendent or designee shall provide reasonable notice to the Proposer of the time for Board consideration of the contract award. The Board’s decision shall be final.

    • Contractual Agreement

      The successful proposer will be required to enter into an agreement substantially similar in format to the sample agreement on the following page(s).

       

    Submission Requirements

    • Proposal Requirements: (required)

      Did you read through and confirm that you met all of the proposal requirements including the sections:

      1. General Conditions
      2. Special Provisions and Specifications
    • Exceptions to Sample Agreement and General Instructions/Terms & Conditions

      Please carefully review the sample agreement and Terms and Conditions of this RFP, read, offer any exceptions, and upload your response. Exceptions offered do NOT have to be accepted by the District and may be grounds for disqualification. This is optional. By not responding to this question, the District assumes there are no exceptions.

    • Do you understand that: (required)

      Contact with any other individual, other than a member of the District's Purchasing Department regarding this RFP may be grounds for disqualification of your Proposal.

      Also, after bid opening, the contents of any proposal shall not be disclosed or made available to competing entities during the evaluation process.

    • Do you understand a San Bernardino City Business License is required of you for providing services within the City of San Bernardino (required)
    • Proposal (without Fee Proposal or Pricing) (required)

      Please upload your COMPLETE Proposal here. *Upload cost breakdown separately in the next step.

      DO NOT INCLUDE YOUR PRICE PROPOSAL HERE 

      NOTE:  There will be a 10 point penalty if pricing is included in this section.

      Section A – Cover Letter/Letter of Interest
      Section B – Description of Company
      Section C – Personnel and Staffing Resources
      Section D – Capacity and Methodology.

       
    • Fee Proposal (required)

      Confirm that your fee proposal is NOT attached in your Proposal and is attached separately here listing the breakdown of all fees.

    • Optional Products, Features, Modules, and Related Services

      Completion of this section is optional and is not required for proposal responsiveness. Vendors may identify and provide pricing for any additional optional software modules, features, licenses, integrations, services, professional development, consulting, or other enhancements that are compatible with the proposed solution but are not included in the base proposal. Pricing submitted in this section will not be considered in the evaluation of proposals unless otherwise identified in this solicitation. The District may, at its sole discretion, purchase any optional products or services identified in this section during the term of the resulting agreement, provided such purchases are determined to be within the original scope of this solicitation.

    • Supplemental Questionnaire (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Workers' Compensation Certification (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Non-Collusion Affidavit (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Vendor Application (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • W-9 Tax Form (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Equal Opportunity Certification (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility an Voluntary Exclusion (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Federal Funding Contract Compliance Form (EDGAR) (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Iran Contracting Act Certification (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Russian Sanctions Certification (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) Form (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Conflict of Interest and Disclosures (required)

      Please download the below documents, complete, and upload.

    • Proof of Fiscal Stability (required)

      The District may request a copy of your most recent audited financial statement attesting to the financial stability of the respondent during the evaluation stage of the RFP process.

      If requested, the document must be submitted and received within 5 days of the request in a sealed envelope addressed to: Attention Laura Cardenas, Director, at 777 N F Street, San Bernardino, CA 92410, with the Proposer’s Company Name, RFP Number, RFP Title, and marked “Financial Statement” clearly indicated on the outside of the envelope.

      Alternatively, the financial document may be submitted via email to laura.cardenas@sbcusd.k12.ca.us as instructed by the District. The District treats all financial statements as proprietary and confidential.

    • SBCUSD DPA - Upon Award (required)

      The District will require a Standard Student Data Privacy Agreement 

      • Provide evidence of current CITE whitelist status

    Key dates

    1. July 20, 2026Published
    2. August 5, 2026Responses Due

    AI classification tags

    Frequently asked questions

    SLED stands for State, Local, and Education. These are solicitations issued by state governments, counties, cities, school districts, utilities, and higher education institutions — as opposed to federal agencies.

    SamSearch Platform

    Stop searching. Start winning.

    AI-powered intelligence for the right opportunities, the right leads, and the right time.