Defense Officials Stress Importance of Defining Cloud Responsibilities

    Defense officials call for clear delineation of security, operations, and compliance roles prior to cloud service adoption. This approach will align workforce capabilities with cloud modernization efforts across defense agencies, enhancing program effectiveness.

    Air Force Research Laboratory, U.S. Marine Corps

    Key Signals

    • Defense officials emphasize shared responsibility model for cloud modernization
    • Agencies advised to clarify cloud security and operations roles
    • Cloud contract requirements to reflect shared responsibility considerations

    "Four or five years ago, we were told by a lot of different organizations, Hey, we need to move to the cloud. But what is it? What s inside the cloud? What does it look like?"

    Gordon Deng, Gravity Platform portfolio lead, Air Force Research Laboratory

    In a significant development for government procurement professionals, defense officials recently underscored the necessity for federal agencies to explicitly delineate responsibilities regarding security, operations, and compliance when choosing cloud service models and managed platforms. This emphasis, expressed during the Digital Government Institute’s 930gov conference in Washington, D.C., aims to facilitate more effective cloud modernization initiatives across defense-related agencies, ensuring that agencies are aligned both operationally and from a workforce perspective.

    At the heart of the discussion is the concept of the shared responsibility model in cloud computing, which outlines how responsibilities are divided between cloud service providers and customers. Gordon Deng, the Gravity Platform portfolio lead at the Air Force Research Laboratory, pointed out a critical oversight that many agencies have made in their cloud migrations: moving to the cloud without a comprehensive understanding of which components fall under the provider's management versus what remains under the agency’s control. He stressed that understanding the intricacies of cloud environments—including compute resources, storage, networking, identity, security tools, and compliance services—is essential before determining operational roles.

    Deng illustrated the shared responsibility model with a diagram representing the varying degrees of control agencies retain depending on their chosen service model. He explained that as agencies move from Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) to Software as a Service (SaaS), their management responsibilities diminish. "The blue boxes are what you, as an organization, or what you, as your team, want to manage… As you move along to the right, there’s less management. Because as you move further along to the right, there’s less responsibility. But when you move back to the left, there’s more responsibility," Deng explained.

    The implications of this guidance are monumental for procurement professionals tasked with managing cloud contracts. They are now encouraged to incorporate considerations related to the shared responsibility model into cloud service solicitations and contract requirements. This shift necessitates that vendors providing cloud solutions not only deliver robust services but also clarify their operational and security roles within those managed platforms.

    Dave Raley, chief digital services officer for the U.S. Marine Corps Operation Stormbreaker, added that irrespective of the selected cloud service model, agencies cannot sidestep the crucial operational and security tasks required to support applications effectively. He laid out key responsibilities such as identity and access management, network monitoring, vulnerability management, incident response, and compliance documentation that all need addressing, regardless of outsourcing decisions. Raley's comments reinforce that cloud migrations should not only be focused on technology transfer but should also encompass essential workforce management aspects.

    As agencies strive to modernize their IT infrastructure through cloud solutions, the newly emphasized need for clarity in responsibility allocation will play a pivotal role in driving successful outcomes. By ensuring that roles are defined upfront, procurement teams can mitigate risks associated with compliance violations and operational misunderstandings, ultimately leading to more diligent contract management and oversight.

    In conclusion, defense officials have sparked a pivotal conversation about the responsibilities involved in cloud transitions that is essential for fostering effective collaboration between agencies and cloud service providers. This discourse will undoubtedly shape how federal agencies approach cloud modernization and traditional procurement practices moving forward.

    • Agencies must establish clear roles and responsibilities for cloud security and operations to mitigate risks and ensure compliance.
    • Procurement professionals should incorporate shared responsibility considerations into cloud service solicitations and contract requirements.
    • Vendors offering cloud solutions should be prepared to clarify their operational and security roles within managed platforms.
    • This guidance impacts planning and execution of cloud modernization initiatives within defense agencies, influencing contract scopes and evaluation criteria.
    • Clear delineation of roles will assist in reducing potential compliance violations and operational misunderstandings.
    • The shared responsibility model will foster better collaboration between federal agencies and cloud service providers, potentially enhancing service delivery.
    • Agencies that remember workforce implications alongside cloud service choices can maintain adequate capacity for cybersecurity and operations.

    Agencies

    • Air Force Research Laboratory
    • U.S. Marine Corps