samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/News/Department of War Establishes Framework for Cognitive Warfare Practices
    federal_newspolicy

    Department of War Establishes Framework for Cognitive Warfare Practices

    The 2026 NDAA compels the Department of War to define cognitive warfare, impacting operational design and decision-making processes. This requirement will likely drive procurement opportunities centered on technologies and training programs aimed at enhancing decision resilience against cognitive threats.

    May 5, 2026Department of War, Senate Armed Services Committee, United States Air Force, Pentagon, Taiwan National Security Bureau

    Key Signals

    • 2026 NDAA mandates cognitive warfare definition by Department of War
    • Anticipated solicitations for cognitive warfare technologies and training programs
    • Emerging requirements for multi-domain cognitive operations solutions

    "Cognitive warfare is a sustained and adaptive contest over human decision-making in which adversaries seek relative advantage by shaping or disrupting perception, interpretation, judgment, and action over time horizons."

    — Bonnie Rushing, SMSgt, USAF, Cybersecurity Researcher

    The passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) marks a significant turning point for the Department of War as it mandates the establishment of a clear and actionable definition of cognitive warfare. This term is crucial to understanding the evolving landscape of military operations, particularly as it relates to the complexities of human decision-making processes. By distinguishing cognitive warfare from other forms of information and influence operations, the Act signifies a strategic shift in how military forces conceive influence and information resilience in the context of adversarial engagements.

    Cognitive warfare is characterized as a dynamic contest where adversaries seek to gain a relative advantage over one another by shaping, disrupting, and ultimately controlling perceptions, interpretations, judgments, and actions of individuals over extended time frames. This nuanced understanding will lead the Department of War to focus on the frameworks necessary for operational design and command structures that can effectively counteract these threats.

    One of the pivotal drivers behind this initiative is the recent examination of cognitive warfare campaigns employed by nation-states such as Russia and China. These state actors have demonstrated sophisticated capabilities in manipulating information to sway public opinion and influence decision-making both in domestic and international contexts. By studying these case studies, the Department aims to develop adaptive strategies that maintain decision resilience and cognitive superiority against such adversarial tactics. It underscores the urgency for military frameworks to incorporate adaptable methodologies that allow for effective responses to cognitive attacks.

    The procurement implications of this mandate are considerable. Professionals in government contracting should prepare for an influx of solicitations from the Department of War and associated agencies regarding research, development, and integration efforts related to cognitive warfare. Opportunities will abound for contractors specializing in key areas such as cybersecurity, human factors, decision support systems, and targeted military training programs. These contractors will need to position themselves strategically to respond to evolving needs in this domain, developing products and services that align with the framework established by the NDAA.

    The emphasis on cognitive warfare represents not just an isolated requirement but a broader shift toward multi-domain operations that encompass not only traditional kinetic engagements but also psychological and cognitive arenas. This development will necessitate cross-disciplinary solutions that combine elements of technology, psychological operations, and military strategy, thus enhancing joint force interoperability. The evolution toward cognitive operations emphasizes the importance of integrating diverse skill sets and knowledge bases into military training and operational planning processes.

    In conclusion, the NDAA’s directive for the Department of War to detail a cognitive warfare definition paves the way for significant changes in military procurement practices and operational methodologies. As contractors look to the future, they must focus on aligning their offerings with this anticipated shift in defense strategy, as the demand for innovative tools and resilient solutions to cognitive challenges within the operational theater will only grow.

    • Cognitive warfare is now defined in the 2026 NDAA, impacting military strategy.
    • Expect new requirements for technologies, training, and operational support in cognitive resilience.
    • The Department of War may solicit contracts for research and integration linked to cognitive frameworks.
    • Contractors with expertise in cybersecurity and military training should prepare to engage in this space.
    • The initiative signals a transition toward multi-domain cognitive operations, requiring innovative cross-disciplinary solutions.
    • There will be a growing emphasis on decision support systems to enhance military effectiveness against cognitive threats.

    Quote: "Cognitive warfare is a sustained and adaptive contest over human decision-making in which adversaries seek relative advantage by shaping or disrupting perception, interpretation, judgment, and action over time horizons." — Bonnie Rushing, SMSgt, USAF, Cybersecurity Researcher

    Agencies

    • Department of War
    • Senate Armed Services Committee
    • United States Air Force
    • Pentagon
    • Taiwan National Security Bureau

    Sources

    • Defining Cognitive Warfare: A NDAA Mandate ResponseSmall Wars Journal · May 05
    CybersecurityDefenseCognitive WarfareMilitary StrategyProcurement
    ← Back to News
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearch
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy