samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/News/Maharashtra Farmers Seek Fairer Onion Prices Amid Rising Costs
    state_local_newspolicy

    Maharashtra Farmers Seek Fairer Onion Prices Amid Rising Costs

    Onion farmers in Maharashtra demand a minimum price increase to Rs 30/kg, citing unviable production costs. The call for transparent procurement mechanisms emphasizes the need for fair market practices, prompting potential changes in state agricultural policies.

    June 13, 2026Union Consumer Affairs Ministry, National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd, National Cooperative Consumers’ Federation of India, State Government of Maharashtra

    Key Signals

    • Farmers in Maharashtra demand Rs 30/kg for summer onions to cover costs.
    • Current procurement price of Rs 16.50/kg insufficient for onion farmers' needs.
    • Calls for direct procurement transparency through APMCs could reshape agricultural practices.

    "NAFED and NCCF should procure onions directly from farmers in a blanket manner. The Centre should fix the procurement rate at Rs 30 per kg, which will also encourage competition among traders and improve returns for farmers."

    — Yogesh Sangle, Farmer

    On June 13, 2026, onion farmers in Nashik, Maharashtra voiced strong opposition to the recently announced procurement price of Rs 16.50 per kg set by the Union Consumer Affairs Ministry. This price is part of a marginal increase from last month’s rate of Rs 15.80 per kg, but farmers argue it is still far below their production costs, estimated at around Rs 20 per kg. With the federal government planning to procure 2 lakh metric tonnes of summer onions via central agencies like the National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd (NAFED) and National Cooperative Consumers’ Federation of India (NCCF), growers are demanding that the minimum support price be raised to Rs 30 per kg. They assert that the current procurement stance not only fails to cover the basic production expenses but also jeopardizes their livelihoods.

    The Maharashtra Onion Growers’ Association, represented by its president Bharat Dighole, underscored that the procurement price set at Rs 16.50 is a "mockery" of what farmers realistically need to recover their costs. Market conditions reveal that A and B grade onions are being sold for prices ranging between Rs 18 and Rs 25 per kg at local Agriculture Produce Market Committees (APMCs). Given these prevailing market rates, farmers argue that the government's procurement rates must be aligned accordingly to avoid incentivizing the sale of onions outside government channels.

    Additionally, local farmers are calling for enhanced transparency in the procurement process. They believe that direct sales through APMCs foster fair practices and competitive pricing. Grower Nivrutti Nyaharkar stressed this approach, stating that purchases conducted outside APMCs often exhibit a lack of transparency which undermines fair pricing mechanisms. The emphasis is being placed on the need for open auctions within APMCs to enhance price discovery and combat potential irregularities.

    As these discussions unfold, farmers like Yogesh Sangle insist that central agencies should standardize their procurement policies, advocating for a flexible grading system that would allow more direct purchasing from farmers without stringent requirements. The implications of these demands could reshape the procurement landscape in Maharashtra, as the state government must consider responding to these calls to ensure agricultural sustainability and fair compensation for producers.

    This demand for a substantial price increase highlights the growing concerns over agricultural profitability and market volatility. If embraced by state policymakers, this could lead to a significant overhaul of current procurement protocols, thus influencing future contracts and procurement strategies across the country. Social equity in agricultural pricing is becoming increasingly urgent for maintaining the economic viability of farmers, particularly amid rising input costs and fluctuating market conditions.

    Action Steps for Industry Stakeholders:

    • Procurement professionals should monitor developments as the demand for revised state-level procurement policies could influence contract valuations and overall procurement volumes in Maharashtra.
    • Enhanced procurement transparency through APMCs may play a vital role in future tendering processes, impacting procurement strategies for agricultural commodities.
    • Vendors and agencies involved in agricultural sectors should prepare for potential adjustments in procurement rate structures, impacting contract negotiations and supply chain logistics significantly.
    • Stakeholders should engage actively with local farmer associations to align procurement strategies with market realities and farmer needs, thereby ensuring sustainable sourcing practices.

    The outcomes from these negotiations and demands by farmers could set a precedent, calling for a comprehensive review of agricultural procurement frameworks, which are critical to ensuring the prosperity of Maharashtra’s farming community.

    Agencies

    • Union Consumer Affairs Ministry
    • National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd
    • National Cooperative Consumers’ Federation of India
    • State Government of Maharashtra

    Vendors

    • National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd
    • National Cooperative Consumers’ Federation of India

    Locations

    • Maharashtra
    • Nashik

    Sources

    • Onion farmers demand Rs 30/kg and APMC-based buying from state govt | Nashik News - The Times of IndiaThe Times of India · Jun 13
    Agricultural ProcurementMarket TransparencyOnion PricingMaharashtra Farming
    ← Back to News
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearch
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy