samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/FAR Navigator/15/15.3/15.302

    FAR Navigator

    • 1Federal Acquisition Regulations System
    • 2Definitions of Words and Terms
    • 3Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of Interest
    • 4Administrative and Information Matters
    • 5Publicizing Contract Actions
    • 6Competition Requirements
    • 7Acquisition Planning
    • 8Required Sources of Supplies and Services
    • 9Contractor Qualifications
    • 10Market Research
    • 11Describing Agency Needs
    • 12Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services
    • 13Simplified Acquisition Procedures
    • 14Sealed Bidding
    • 15Contracting by Negotiation
      • 15.000Scope of part.
      • 15.001Definitions.
      • 15.1Subpart 15.1
      • 15.002Types of negotiated acquisition.
      • 15.2Subpart 15.2
      • 15.3Subpart 15.3
        • 15.300Scope of subpart.
        • 15.301[Reserved]
        • 15.302Source selection objective.
        • 15.303Responsibilities.
        • 15.304Evaluation factors and significant subfactors.
        • 15.305Proposal evaluation.
        • 15.306Exchanges with offerors after receipt of proposals.
        • 15.307Proposal revisions.
        • 15.308Source selection decision.
      • 15.4Subpart 15.4
      • 15.5Subpart 15.5
      • 15.6Subpart 15.6
    • 16Types of Contracts
    • 17Special Contracting Methods
    • 18Emergency Acquisitions
    • 19Small Business Programs
    • 22Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
    • 23Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace
    • 24Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information
    • 25Foreign Acquisition
    • 26Other Socioeconomic Programs
    • 27Patents, Data, and Copyrights
    • 28Bonds and Insurance
    • 29Taxes
    • 30Cost Accounting Standards Administration
    • 31Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
    • 32Contract Financing
    • 33Protests, Disputes, and Appeals
    • 34Major System Acquisition
    • 35Research and Development Contracting
    • 36Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts
    • 37Service Contracting
    • 38Federal Supply Schedule Contracting
    • 39Acquisition of Information Technology
    • 40Reserved
    • 41Acquisition of Utility Services
    • 42Contract Administration and Audit Services
    • 43Contract Modifications
    • 44Subcontracting Policies and Procedures
    • 45Government Property
    • 46Quality Assurance
    • 47Transportation
    • 48Value Engineering
    • 49Termination of Contracts
    • 50Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the Safety Act
    • 51Use of Government Sources by Contractors
    • 52Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
    • 53Forms
    Up to 15.3
    SectionUpdated April 16, 2026

    FAR 15.302—Source selection objective.

    Plain-English Summary

    FAR 15.302 states the basic objective of source selection in negotiated procurements: to choose the proposal that represents the best value to the Government. This section is short, but it is foundational because it frames the entire source selection process under FAR Part 15, including how proposals are evaluated, compared, and ultimately selected. In practice, it means the Government is not required to award to the lowest-priced offeror unless that offer provides the best value under the solicitation’s stated evaluation scheme. The section supports the use of tradeoffs, evaluation factors, and source selection authority judgment, while also reinforcing that the selection decision must be tied to the solicitation and the Government’s needs. For contractors, it signals that winning is about more than price alone; for contracting officials, it means the record must show why the chosen proposal is the best value based on the announced criteria.

    Key Rules

    Best value is the objective

    The source selection process exists to identify the proposal that offers the best value to the Government. Best value may reflect a combination of price, quality, technical merit, past performance, risk, and other factors identified in the solicitation.

    Selection is based on proposals

    The decision is made by comparing proposals received in response to the solicitation. The Government evaluates the proposals against the stated criteria and selects the one that best satisfies the Government’s needs.

    Lowest price is not the default

    This section does not require award to the lowest-priced proposal. A higher-priced proposal may be selected if it provides the best value under the evaluation approach established for the acquisition.

    Solicitation criteria control

    The best-value determination must be made using the evaluation factors and relative importance stated in the solicitation. Source selection cannot rely on unstated preferences or criteria outside the solicitation.

    Source selection is a judgment process

    The objective recognizes that source selection involves informed business judgment by the Government. The selection authority must weigh the evaluated strengths, weaknesses, risks, and price or cost considerations to determine which proposal is most advantageous.

    Responsibilities

    Contracting Officer / Source Selection Authority

    Ensure the source selection process is conducted to identify the proposal that represents the best value. Apply the solicitation’s evaluation scheme, document the rationale for the selection decision, and make sure the award decision is supportable and consistent with the stated criteria.

    Evaluation Team / Technical Evaluators

    Assess proposals against the solicitation factors and provide objective findings on strengths, weaknesses, risks, and other evaluated elements. Their role is to support the best-value decision with a clear, fact-based evaluation record.

    Contractor / Offeror

    Submit a proposal that demonstrates value under the stated evaluation criteria, not just competitive pricing. Address technical merit, performance history, risk, and any other factors the solicitation says will matter in the best-value decision.

    Agency

    Structure the acquisition and source selection approach so the Government can identify the best value. Ensure the solicitation clearly states the evaluation factors and their relative importance so offerors understand how value will be judged.

    Practical Implications

    1

    Contractors should focus on the full evaluation picture, not just price, because a technically stronger or lower-risk proposal can beat a cheaper one.

    2

    Contracting officers must make sure the solicitation clearly explains what “best value” means for that acquisition; vague criteria create protest risk and weak award decisions.

    3

    The source selection record should show why the chosen proposal is better overall, especially when the award is not to the lowest-priced offeror.

    4

    A common pitfall is using unstated preferences or giving hidden weight to factors not disclosed in the solicitation.

    5

    Another frequent issue is failing to connect the evaluation findings to the final selection decision; the decision must be traceable to the announced criteria and the Government’s needs.

    Official Regulatory Text

    The objective of source selection is to select the proposal that represents the best value.

    Back to 15.3FAR Navigator
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearch
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy