samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/FAR Navigator/25/25.5/25.503

    FAR Navigator

    • 1Federal Acquisition Regulations System
    • 2Definitions of Words and Terms
    • 3Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of Interest
    • 4Administrative and Information Matters
    • 5Publicizing Contract Actions
    • 6Competition Requirements
    • 7Acquisition Planning
    • 8Required Sources of Supplies and Services
    • 9Contractor Qualifications
    • 10Market Research
    • 11Describing Agency Needs
    • 12Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services
    • 13Simplified Acquisition Procedures
    • 14Sealed Bidding
    • 15Contracting by Negotiation
    • 16Types of Contracts
    • 17Special Contracting Methods
    • 18Emergency Acquisitions
    • 19Small Business Programs
    • 22Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
    • 23Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace
    • 24Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information
    • 25Foreign Acquisition
      • 25.000Scope of part.
      • 25.001General.
      • 25.1Subpart 25.1
      • 25.2Subpart 25.2
      • 25.002Applicability of subparts.
      • 25.003Definitions.
      • 25.3Subpart 25.3
      • 25.4Subpart 25.4
      • 25.5Subpart 25.5
        • 25.501General.
        • 25.502Application.
        • 25.503Group offers.
        • 25.504Evaluation examples.
      • 25.6Subpart 25.6
      • 25.7Subpart 25.7
      • 25.8Subpart 25.8
      • 25.9Subpart 25.9
    • 26Other Socioeconomic Programs
    • 27Patents, Data, and Copyrights
    • 28Bonds and Insurance
    • 29Taxes
    • 30Cost Accounting Standards Administration
    • 31Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
    • 32Contract Financing
    • 33Protests, Disputes, and Appeals
    • 34Major System Acquisition
    • 35Research and Development Contracting
    • 36Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts
    • 37Service Contracting
    • 38Federal Supply Schedule Contracting
    • 39Acquisition of Information Technology
    • 40Reserved
    • 41Acquisition of Utility Services
    • 42Contract Administration and Audit Services
    • 43Contract Modifications
    • 44Subcontracting Policies and Procedures
    • 45Government Property
    • 46Quality Assurance
    • 47Transportation
    • 48Value Engineering
    • 49Termination of Contracts
    • 50Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the Safety Act
    • 51Use of Government Sources by Contractors
    • 52Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
    • 53Forms
    Up to 25.5
    SectionUpdated April 16, 2026

    FAR 25.503—Group offers.

    Plain-English Summary

    FAR 25.503 explains how to evaluate offers when award is restricted to a group of line items or to all line items in the solicitation or offer. It covers four related situations: group awards where prohibited end products or WTO GPA-restricted items are present, group awards where an offeror limits award to a group of line items, group awards under trade agreements when the award decision must be made at the group level, and group awards when no trade agreement applies. The section tells contracting personnel how to determine whether to reject an offer, how to identify the tentative award pattern, how to decide whether an offer is domestic, eligible, or foreign, and when to apply the evaluation factor under FAR 25.502. In practice, this section prevents improper splitting of awards, ensures consistent treatment of line items within grouped awards, and preserves the price evaluation preferences required by Buy American, trade agreement, and other domestic preference rules. It is especially important when a solicitation uses grouped line items, because the evaluation method changes from a line-item-by-line-item comparison to a group-based comparison that can affect both offer acceptability and award outcome.

    Key Rules

    Reject prohibited group awards

    If the solicitation or offer requires award only on a group of line items or all line items, the offer must be rejected if any part of the award would include prohibited end products under subpart 25.7. If the acquisition is covered by the WTO GPA and any part of the offer includes items restricted under 25.403(c), the offer must also be rejected.

    Evaluate restricted line-item offers separately

    When an offer restricts award to a group of line items or all line items in the offer, the contracting officer must first evaluate unrestricted offers line item by line item to form a tentative award pattern. Then the restricted offer is compared against that pattern using the appropriate evaluation factor on a line-item basis, and award goes to the restricted offer only if its total evaluated price is lower.

    Use group-level domestic/foreign determination under trade agreements

    If the solicitation requires award only on a group or all line items and a trade agreement applies, the category of end products is determined for each line item, but the decision whether to apply an evaluation factor is made at the group level. If domestic end products exceed 50 percent of the group’s proposed price, the whole group is treated as domestic; otherwise it is treated as foreign.

    Treat foreign groups as eligible when threshold is met

    For foreign offers under a trade agreement, if domestic end products plus eligible products exceed 50 percent of the group’s proposed price, the entire group is evaluated as an eligible offer. This group-level classification controls how the evaluation factor is applied to the whole group.

    Apply evaluation factor to the entire group

    When a group award is required, the evaluation factor is applied to the entire group in accordance with FAR 25.502. The rule is not applied line item by line item once the group classification has been made, except as specifically directed by the referenced examples and exceptions.

    Use group-level rules when no trade agreement applies

    If no trade agreement applies and the solicitation requires award only on a group or all line items, the contracting officer still determines domestic or foreign status by line item, but decides whether to apply the evaluation factor based on the group as a whole. If domestic end products exceed 50 percent of the group’s proposed price, the group is treated as domestic; otherwise it is treated as foreign.

    Apply special domestic-content exception when applicable

    Under the no-trade-agreement rule, if FAR 25.502(c)(4) applies and the evaluated price of the low offer remains below the lowest domestic offer, a group may be treated as domestic if end products with at least 55 percent domestic content exceed 50 percent of the group’s proposed price. This is a specific exception that can change the evaluation outcome.

    Responsibilities

    Contracting Officer

    Determine whether the solicitation or offer requires award on a group of line items or on all line items, identify whether prohibited end products or WTO GPA-restricted items are present, and reject offers when required by paragraph (a). For grouped awards, build the tentative award pattern, compare restricted offers against that pattern, classify groups as domestic, eligible, or foreign as required, and apply the correct evaluation factor under FAR 25.502.

    Offeror/Contractor

    Structure the offer consistently with the solicitation’s award basis, disclose any award restriction to a group or to all line items, and ensure offered products do not trigger rejection rules for prohibited end products or WTO GPA-restricted items. The offeror must also understand that group pricing and product composition can affect whether the offer is evaluated as domestic, eligible, or foreign.

    Agency/Requirement Owner

    Draft the solicitation clearly to state whether award may be made by line item, by group of line items, or only on all line items, because that choice controls the evaluation method. The agency must also ensure the solicitation aligns with applicable trade agreement and domestic preference requirements so evaluators can apply the correct group-based rules.

    Evaluation Team

    Perform the price evaluation exactly as prescribed, including line-item tentative award pattern analysis, group-level domestic-content determinations, and application of the appropriate evaluation factor. The team must document the basis for classification and award selection so the record shows compliance with FAR 25.503 and the referenced examples.

    Practical Implications

    1

    This section matters most when a solicitation bundles items together, because the award decision can change from the lowest line-item price to the lowest evaluated group price. Contractors should not assume they can win individual items if the solicitation requires award only as a group or on all line items.

    2

    A common pitfall is mixing line-item and group logic. Once the solicitation or offer requires a group award, the evaluator must follow the group rules for classification and evaluation, even though some determinations still start at the line-item level.

    3

    Another frequent mistake is overlooking the rejection rules for prohibited end products or WTO GPA-restricted items. If those items are present in a required group award, the offer may be nonresponsive or otherwise unacceptable under the applicable rule.

    4

    Offerors should pay close attention to how domestic content is distributed across the group, because the 50 percent threshold can determine whether the whole group is treated as domestic, eligible, or foreign. Small changes in product mix or pricing can change the evaluation result.

    5

    Contracting officers should document the tentative award pattern and the application of the evaluation factor carefully, especially where a restricted offer is compared against unrestricted line-item awards. Clear documentation helps defend the award decision and reduces protest risk.

    Official Regulatory Text

    (a) If the solicitation or an offer specifies that award can be made only on a group of line items or on all line items contained in the solicitation or offer, reject the offer- (1) If any part of the award would consist of prohibited end products (see subpart  25.7 ); or (2) If the acquisition is covered by the WTO GPA and any part of the offer consists of items restricted in accordance with 25.403 (c). (b) If an offer restricts award to a group of line items or to all line items contained in the offer, determine for each line item whether to apply an evaluation factor (see 25.504-4 , Example 1). (1) First, evaluate offers that do not specify an award restriction on a line item basis in accordance with 25.502 , determining a tentative award pattern by selecting for each line item the offer with the lowest evaluated price. (2) Evaluate an offer that specifies an award restriction against the offered prices of the tentative award pattern, applying the appropriate evaluation factor on a line item basis. (3) Compute the total evaluated price for the tentative award pattern and the offer that specified an award restriction. (4) Unless the total evaluated price of the offer that specified an award restriction is less than the total evaluated price of the tentative award pattern, award based on the tentative award pattern. (c) If the solicitation specifies that award will be made only on a group of line items or all line items contained in the solicitation, determine the category of end products on the basis of each line item, but determine whether to apply an evaluation factor on the basis of the group of items (see 25.504-4 , Example 2). (1) If the proposed price of domestic end products exceeds 50 percent of the total proposed price of the group, evaluate the entire group as a domestic offer. Evaluate all other groups as foreign offers. (2) For foreign offers, if the proposed price of domestic end products and eligible products exceeds 50 percent of the total proposed price of the group, evaluate the entire group as an eligible offer. (3) Apply the evaluation factor to the entire group in accordance with 25.502 . (d) If no trade agreement applies to a solicitation and the solicitation specifies that award will be made only on a group of line items or all line items contained in the solicitation, determine the category of end products ( i.e., domestic or foreign) on the basis of each line item, but determine whether to apply an evaluation factor on the basis of the group of items ( see 25.504-4 (c), Example 3). (1) If the proposed price of domestic end products exceeds 50 percent of the total proposed price of the group, evaluate the entire group as a domestic offer. Evaluate all other groups as foreign offers. (2) Apply the evaluation factor to the entire group in accordance with 25.502 , except where 25.502 (c)(4) applies and the evaluated price of the low offer remains less than the lowest domestic offer. Where the evaluated price of the low offer remains less than the lowest domestic offer, treat as a domestic offer any group where the proposed price of end products with a domestic content of at least 55 percent exceeds 50 percent of the total proposed price of the group. (3) Apply the evaluation factor to the entire group in accordance with 25.502 (c)(4).

    Back to 25.5FAR Navigator
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearch
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy