samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/FAR Navigator/37/37.2/37.204

    FAR Navigator

    • 1Federal Acquisition Regulations System
    • 2Definitions of Words and Terms
    • 3Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of Interest
    • 4Administrative and Information Matters
    • 5Publicizing Contract Actions
    • 6Competition Requirements
    • 7Acquisition Planning
    • 8Required Sources of Supplies and Services
    • 9Contractor Qualifications
    • 10Market Research
    • 11Describing Agency Needs
    • 12Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services
    • 13Simplified Acquisition Procedures
    • 14Sealed Bidding
    • 15Contracting by Negotiation
    • 16Types of Contracts
    • 17Special Contracting Methods
    • 18Emergency Acquisitions
    • 19Small Business Programs
    • 22Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
    • 23Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace
    • 24Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information
    • 25Foreign Acquisition
    • 26Other Socioeconomic Programs
    • 27Patents, Data, and Copyrights
    • 28Bonds and Insurance
    • 29Taxes
    • 30Cost Accounting Standards Administration
    • 31Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
    • 32Contract Financing
    • 33Protests, Disputes, and Appeals
    • 34Major System Acquisition
    • 35Research and Development Contracting
    • 36Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts
    • 37Service Contracting
      • 37.000Scope of part.
      • 37.1Subpart 37.1
      • 37.2Subpart 37.2
        • 37.200Scope of subpart.
        • 37.201Definition.
        • 37.202Exclusions.
        • 37.203Policy.
        • 37.204Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.
        • 37.205Contracting officer responsibilities.
      • 37.3Subpart 37.3
      • 37.4Subpart 37.4
      • 37.5Subpart 37.5
      • 37.6Subpart 37.6
    • 38Federal Supply Schedule Contracting
    • 39Acquisition of Information Technology
    • 40Reserved
    • 41Acquisition of Utility Services
    • 42Contract Administration and Audit Services
    • 43Contract Modifications
    • 44Subcontracting Policies and Procedures
    • 45Government Property
    • 46Quality Assurance
    • 47Transportation
    • 48Value Engineering
    • 49Termination of Contracts
    • 50Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the Safety Act
    • 51Use of Government Sources by Contractors
    • 52Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
    • 53Forms
    Up to 37.2
    SectionUpdated April 16, 2026

    FAR 37.204—Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.

    Plain-English Summary

    FAR 37.204 tells agencies how to decide whether they have enough qualified people to evaluate or analyze proposals before they rely on outside support or make other staffing decisions for acquisition work. It covers the agency head’s duty to assess the availability of personnel with the right training and capabilities, the requirement to look to other Federal agencies when internal staff are not available, and the factors to weigh in deciding whether to search for borrowed personnel. It also addresses the process for detailing personnel from a supporting agency, what happens when reasonable efforts still do not produce qualified personnel, and the special case where an agency may make a class-wide determination for proposals requiring unusually unique or specialized expertise. In practice, this section is about making sure proposal evaluations are performed by competent people while balancing mission needs, cost, time, and interagency resource use. It helps agencies avoid delays, unnecessary expense, and poorly supported source selection or analysis decisions, and it gives contractors confidence that evaluations are being conducted by personnel with appropriate expertise.

    Key Rules

    Assess internal availability first

    The head of the agency must determine for each evaluation or analysis of proposals whether the agency has enough personnel with the required training and capabilities to do the work. This is an affirmative staffing check, not an assumption that internal staff are available.

    Look to other agencies if needed

    If qualified personnel are not available inside the agency for a specific evaluation or analysis, the agency head must identify which other Federal agencies may have personnel with the needed training and capabilities. The agency cannot stop at internal shortages.

    Weigh cost, time, and mission impact

    In deciding whether to search for personnel from other agencies, the agency head must consider administrative search costs, procurement dollar value, travel and other support costs, and the other agencies’ need to use their personnel for mission work. The rule requires a practical, governmentwide resource decision, not just a staffing search.

    Use a formal detail agreement

    If a supporting agency agrees to provide the personnel, the agencies must execute an agreement for the detail of those personnel to the requesting agency. This creates the formal arrangement for borrowing the needed expertise.

    Proceed only after reasonable attempts

    If the requesting agency makes reasonable attempts but still cannot identify personnel with the required training and capabilities, the agency head may make the determination required by FAR 37.203. This preserves a fallback path when qualified personnel truly are unavailable.

    Class-wide determinations are allowed

    An agency may determine availability for a class of proposals when the required evaluation or analysis involves expertise so unique or specialized that it is not reasonable to expect such personnel to be available. This allows agencies to address recurring, highly specialized needs without repeating the same search each time.

    Responsibilities

    Head of Agency

    Determine whether sufficient qualified personnel are available for each proposal evaluation or analysis; if not, identify other Federal agencies that may have the needed expertise; consider search costs, procurement value, travel and other costs, and mission needs; approve or rely on a detail agreement when another agency provides personnel; and, after reasonable unsuccessful efforts, make the determination required by FAR 37.203. The head of agency may also make class-wide availability determinations for uniquely specialized proposal work.

    Requesting Agency

    When internal personnel are unavailable, conduct reasonable efforts to identify qualified personnel from other Federal agencies, evaluate the practical costs and mission impacts of borrowing personnel, and arrange the detail agreement if a supporting agency agrees to provide staff.

    Supporting Agency

    Decide whether it can make qualified personnel available to the requesting agency and, if so, enter into an agreement for the detail of those personnel.

    Personnel Performing Evaluation or Analysis

    Provide the requisite training and capabilities needed for the specific proposal evaluation or analysis, whether they are agency employees or detailed personnel from another Federal agency.

    Practical Implications

    1

    Agencies should treat staffing for proposal evaluation as a documented decision, not an informal assumption. A weak or undocumented availability check can lead to delays, protest risk, or questions about whether the evaluation was properly supported.

    2

    The rule encourages use of interagency resources, but only when it makes sense after considering cost, time, travel, and mission impact. In practice, agencies should avoid spending more to borrow experts than the procurement justifies.

    3

    Reasonable attempts matter. If an agency cannot find qualified personnel, it should be able to show what searches were made, which agencies were contacted, and why the effort failed before relying on the fallback authority.

    4

    Class-wide determinations can save time for highly specialized acquisitions, but they should be used carefully and only when the expertise is truly unique or specialized enough that qualified personnel are not reasonably expected to be available.

    5

    Contracting officers and acquisition leaders should coordinate early with program offices and human capital resources so proposal evaluation staffing problems do not surface late in the source selection or analysis process.

    Official Regulatory Text

    (a) The head of an agency shall determine, for each evaluation or analysis of proposals, if sufficient personnel with the requisite training and capabilities are available within the agency to perform the evaluation or analysis of proposals submitted for the acquisition. (b) If, for a specific evaluation or analysis, such personnel are not available within the agency, the head of the agency shall- (1) Determine which Federal agencies may have personnel with the required training and capabilities; and (2) Consider the administrative cost and time associated with conducting the search, the dollar value of the procurement, other costs, such as travel costs involved in the use of such personnel, and the needs of the Federal agencies to make management decisions on the best use of available personnel in performing the agency’s mission. (c) If the supporting agency agrees to make the required personnel available, the agencies shall execute an agreement for the detail of the supporting agency’s personnel to the requesting agency. (d) If the requesting agency, after reasonable attempts to obtain personnel with the required training and capabilities, is unable to identify such personnel, the head of the agency may make the determination required by 37.203 . (e) An agency may make a determination regarding the availability of covered personnel for a class of proposals for which evaluation and analysis would require expertise so unique or specialized that it is not reasonable to expect such personnel to be available.

    Back to 37.2FAR Navigator
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearch
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy