samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/FAR Navigator/25/25.5/25.504/25.504-4

    FAR Navigator

    • 1Federal Acquisition Regulations System
    • 2Definitions of Words and Terms
    • 3Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of Interest
    • 4Administrative and Information Matters
    • 5Publicizing Contract Actions
    • 6Competition Requirements
    • 7Acquisition Planning
    • 8Required Sources of Supplies and Services
    • 9Contractor Qualifications
    • 10Market Research
    • 11Describing Agency Needs
    • 12Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services
    • 13Simplified Acquisition Procedures
    • 14Sealed Bidding
    • 15Contracting by Negotiation
    • 16Types of Contracts
    • 17Special Contracting Methods
    • 18Emergency Acquisitions
    • 19Small Business Programs
    • 22Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
    • 23Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace
    • 24Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information
    • 25Foreign Acquisition
      • 25.000Scope of part.
      • 25.001General.
      • 25.1Subpart 25.1
      • 25.2Subpart 25.2
      • 25.002Applicability of subparts.
      • 25.003Definitions.
      • 25.3Subpart 25.3
      • 25.4Subpart 25.4
      • 25.5Subpart 25.5
        • 25.501General.
        • 25.502Application.
        • 25.503Group offers.
        • 25.504Evaluation examples.
          • 25.504-1Buy American statute.
          • 25.504-2WTO GPA/Caribbean Basin Trade Initiative/FTAs.
          • 25.504-3FTA/Israeli Trade Act.
          • 25.504-4Group award basis.
      • 25.6Subpart 25.6
      • 25.7Subpart 25.7
      • 25.8Subpart 25.8
      • 25.9Subpart 25.9
    • 26Other Socioeconomic Programs
    • 27Patents, Data, and Copyrights
    • 28Bonds and Insurance
    • 29Taxes
    • 30Cost Accounting Standards Administration
    • 31Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
    • 32Contract Financing
    • 33Protests, Disputes, and Appeals
    • 34Major System Acquisition
    • 35Research and Development Contracting
    • 36Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts
    • 37Service Contracting
    • 38Federal Supply Schedule Contracting
    • 39Acquisition of Information Technology
    • 40Reserved
    • 41Acquisition of Utility Services
    • 42Contract Administration and Audit Services
    • 43Contract Modifications
    • 44Subcontracting Policies and Procedures
    • 45Government Property
    • 46Quality Assurance
    • 47Transportation
    • 48Value Engineering
    • 49Termination of Contracts
    • 50Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the Safety Act
    • 51Use of Government Sources by Contractors
    • 52Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
    • 53Forms
    Up to 25.504
    subsectionUpdated April 16, 2026

    FAR 25.504-4—Group award basis.

    Plain-English Summary

    FAR 25.504-4 explains how to evaluate offers when the solicitation uses a group award basis and the Buy American statute or related domestic-preference rules apply. The section is built around worked examples that show how to compare domestic, eligible, and noneligible end products; how to apply the price evaluation factor; how to handle all-or-none offers; and how to determine the award pattern when multiple line items are grouped together. It also shows the difference between evaluating individual line items and evaluating a group of items as a package, including how the tentative award pattern is formed before considering a competing all-or-none offer. The examples cover situations where the WTO GPA does not apply, where the Buy American statute applies, and where domestic content percentages affect whether an offer is treated as domestic or foreign. In practice, this section matters because the lowest raw price is not always the award winner; contracting officers must follow the domestic-preference evaluation method exactly, or they may make an incorrect award decision. Contractors also need to understand that a low-priced foreign offer can lose once the evaluation factor is applied, and that an all-or-none condition can change the award outcome across grouped items.

    Key Rules

    Evaluate by the solicitation method

    When the solicitation calls for group award, the agency evaluates offers as a package rather than simply line by line in isolation. The examples show that the contracting officer first establishes the tentative award pattern under the applicable preference rules, then compares that pattern against any all-or-none offer.

    Apply domestic preference rules first

    The evaluation must reflect whether the acquisition is covered by the WTO GPA or only by the Buy American statute, because that determines whether a price evaluation factor applies and to which products. The examples show that domestic, eligible, and noneligible products are treated differently depending on the governing trade and domestic-content rules.

    Use the 20 percent factor when required

    If the low offer is a foreign or noneligible offer and the other offer for that line item is domestic, the contracting officer applies the evaluation factor to the foreign/noneligible offer. The examples use a 20 percent factor, or 30 percent if the domestic offer is from a small business, to determine the evaluated price.

    Compare tentative award patterns to all-or-none offers

    When an offeror conditions its proposal on receiving all items or none, the contracting officer must compare that all-or-none evaluated total against the tentative award pattern formed from the other offers. Award goes to the lower evaluated result, even if the raw prices suggest a different outcome.

    Determine domestic status by content percentages

    For group awards under the Buy American analysis, the examples show that an offer can be domestic if the domestic portion of the total offer meets the required threshold. If the offer is not domestic, the contracting officer then determines whether it is eligible or noneligible before applying any factor.

    Do not apply the factor unnecessarily

    The examples show that the evaluation factor is not applied to every foreign item automatically. It is applied only when the rule calls for it, such as when the low offer is foreign and the other offer for that line item is domestic, or when the specific evaluation step requires it under the applicable subsection.

    Responsibilities

    Contracting Officer

    Identify whether the acquisition is subject to the WTO GPA, the Buy American statute, or another domestic-preference rule; determine whether the solicitation uses line-item or group award; classify offers as domestic, eligible, or noneligible; apply the correct evaluation factor where required; compare tentative award patterns against all-or-none offers; and make award to the evaluated combination that is lowest in accordance with the applicable rule.

    Offeror/Contractor

    Structure the proposal consistently with the solicitation’s award basis, including any all-or-none condition; identify domestic and foreign end products accurately; provide pricing that can be evaluated under the domestic-preference rules; and understand that the evaluated price, not the raw price, controls award outcome.

    Agency

    Draft the solicitation to state the award basis clearly, including whether award will be made on a group basis and whether all-or-none offers are permitted; ensure the applicable domestic-preference regime is identified; and support the contracting officer in applying the correct evaluation methodology.

    Evaluation Team

    Calculate domestic-content percentages and evaluated prices accurately; document the tentative award pattern; and ensure the evaluation record shows how the group award decision was reached under the applicable preference rules.

    Practical Implications

    1

    A low bid is not necessarily the winning bid once domestic-preference adjustments are applied; contractors should always evaluate their competitive position using the evaluated price, not just the offered price.

    2

    Group award evaluations can change the result dramatically because the government may combine line items from different offers into a tentative award pattern before comparing it to an all-or-none proposal.

    3

    A common mistake is applying the 20 percent factor to the wrong offer or at the wrong stage; the factor only applies when the rule requires it, and the comparison must be made item by item under the stated method.

    4

    Contractors offering foreign products should pay close attention to whether their products are classified as eligible or noneligible, because that classification can determine whether they lose on evaluation even when their raw price is lower.

    5

    When an offeror conditions its proposal on all-or-none award, the contracting officer must test that condition against the tentative award pattern; failing to do so can lead to an incorrect award decision and a flawed price evaluation record.

    Official Regulatory Text

    (a) Example 1 . OFFERS Item A B C 1 DO = $55,000 EL = $56,000 NEL = $50,000 2 NEL = $13,000 EL = $10,000 EL = $13,000 3 NEL = $11,500 DO = $12,000 DO = $10,000 4 NEL = $24,000 EL = $28,000 NEL = $22,000 5 DO = $18,000 NEL = $10,000 DO = $14,000 $121,500 $116,000 $109,000 Key: DO = Domestic end product EL = Eligible product NEL = Noneligible product Problem : Offeror C specifies all-or-none award. Assume all offerors are large businesses. The acquisition is not covered by the WTO GPA. Analysis : (see 25.503 ) STEP 1 : Evaluate Offers A & B before considering Offer C and determine which offer has the lowest evaluated cost for each line item (the tentative award pattern): Item 1 : Low offer A is domestic; select A. Item 2 : Low offer B is eligible; do not apply factor; select B. Item 3 : Low offer A is noneligible and Offer B is a domestic offer. Apply a 20 percent factor to Offer A. The evaluated price of Offer A is higher than Offer B; select B. Item 4 : Low offer A is noneligible. Since neither offer is a domestic offer, no evaluation factor applies; select A. Item 5 : Low offer B is noneligible; apply a 20 percent factor to Offer B. Offer A is still higher than Offer B; select B. STEP 2 : Evaluate Offer C against the tentative award pattern for Offers A and B: OFFERS Item Low Offer Tentative Award Pattern from A and B C 1 A DO = $ 55,000 *NEL = $60,000 2 B EL = $10,000 EL = $13,000 3 B DO = $12,000 DO = $10,000 4 A NEL = $24,000 NEL = $22,000 5 B *NEL = $12,000 DO = $14,000 TOTAL $113,000 $119,000 *Offer + 20 percent. On a line item basis, apply a factor to any noneligible offer if the other offer for that line item is domestic. For Item 1, apply a factor to Offer C because Offer A is domestic and the acquisition was not covered by the WTO GPA. The evaluated price of Offer C, Item 1, becomes $60,000 ($50,000 plus 20 percent). Apply a factor to Offer B, Item 5, because it is a noneligible product and Offer C is domestic. The evaluated price of Offer B is $12,000 ($10,000 plus 20 percent). Evaluate the remaining items without applying a factor. STEP 3: The tentative unrestricted award pattern from Offers A and B is lower than the evaluated price of Offer C. Award the combination of Offers A and B. Note that if Offer C had not specified all-or-none award, award would be made on Offer C for line items 3 and 4, totaling an award of $32,000. (b) Example 2 . OFFERS Item A B C 1 DO = $50,000 EL = $50,500 NEL = $50,000 2 NEL = $10,300 NEL = $10,000 EL = $10,200 3 EL = $20,400 EL = $21,000 NEL = $20,200 4 DO = $10,500 DO = $10,300 DO = $10,400 TOTAL $91,200 $91,800 $90,800 Problem: The solicitation specifies award on a group basis. Assume the Buy American statute applies and the acquisition cannot be set aside for small business concerns. All offerors are large businesses. Analysis: (see 25.503 (c)) STEP 1: Determine which of the offers are domestic (see 25.503 (c)(1)): Domestic [percent] Determination A $50,000 (Offer A1) + $10,500 (Offer A4) = $60,500 $60,500/$91,200 (Offer A Total) = 66.3% Domestic B $10,300 (Offer B4) /$91,800 (Offer B Total) $ = 11.2% Foreign C $10,400 (Offer C4) /$90,800 (Offer C Total) = 11.5% Foreign STEP 2 : Determine whether foreign offers are eligible or noneligible offers (see 25.503 (c)(2)): Domestic

    • Eligible [percent] Determination A N/A (Both Domestic) Domestic B $50,500 (Offer B1) + $21,000 (Offer B3) + $10,300 (Offer B4)= $81,800. $81,800 /$91,800 (Offer B Total) = 89.1% Eligible C $10,200 (Offer C2) + $10,400 (Offer C4) = $20,600. $20,600/$90,800 (Offer C Total) = 22.7% Noneligible STEP 3: Determine whether to apply an evaluation factor (see 25.503 (c)(3)). The low offer (Offer C) is a foreign offer. There is no eligible offer lower than the domestic offer. Therefore, apply the factor to the low offer. Addition of the 20 percent factor (use 30 percent if Offer A is a small business) to Offer C yields an evaluated price of $108,960 ($90,800 + 20 percent). Award on Offer A (see 25.502 (c)(4)(ii)). Note that, if Offer A were greater than Offer B, an evaluation factor would not be applied, and award would be on Offer C (see 25.502 (c)(3)). (c) Example 3 . OFFERS Item A B C 1 DO = $17,800 FO (>55%) = $16,000 FO (>55%) = $11,200 2 FO (>55%) = $9,000 FO (>55%) = $8,500 DO = $10,200 3 FO (>55%) = $11,200 FO (>55%) = $12,000 FO (>55%) = $11,000 4 DO = $10,000 DO = $9,000 FO (>55%) = $6,400 Total $48,000 $45,500 $38,800. Key: DO = Domestic end product (complies with the required domestic content). FO > 55% = Foreign end product with domestic content exceeding 55%. FO < 55% = Foreign end product with domestic content of 55% or less. Problem: The solicitation specifies award on a group basis. Assume only the Buy American statute applies ( i.e., no trade agreements apply) and the acquisition cannot be set aside for small business concerns. All offerors are large businesses. Analysis: (see 25.503 (d)) STEP 1: Determine which of the offers are domestic (see 25.503 (d)(1)). Domestic [percent] Determination A $17,800 (Offer A1) + $10,000 (Offer A4) = $27,800 $27,800/$48,000 (Offer A Total) = 58% Domestic B $9,000 (Offer B4)/$45,500 (Offer B Total) = 19.8% Foreign C $10,200 (Offer C2)/$38,800 (Offer C Total) = 26.3% Foreign STEP 2: Determine which offer, domestic or foreign, is the low offer. If the low offer is a foreign offer, apply the evaluation factor (see 25.503(d)(2)). The low offer (Offer C) is a foreign offer. Therefore, apply the factor to the low offer. Addition of the 20 percent factor (use 30 percent if Offer A is a small business) to Offer C yields an evaluated price of $46,560 ($38,800 + 20 percent). Offer C remains the low offer. STEP 3: Determine if there is a foreign offer that could be treated as a domestic offer (see 25.106 (b)(2) and 25.503 (d)(2)). Amount of domestic content (percent) Determination A N/A N/A B $9,000 (Offer B4)/$45,500 (Offer B Total) $ = 19.8% is domestic AND $16,000 (Offer B1) + $8,500 (Offer B2) + $12,000 (Offer B3) = $36,500 $36,500/$45,500 (Offer B Total) = 80.2% can be treated as domestic 19.8% + 80.2% = 100% is domestic or can be treated as domestic Can be treated as domestic. C $10,200 (Offer C2)/$38,800 (Offer C Total) = 26.3% is domestic Noneligible STEP 4: If there is a foreign offer that could be treated as a domestic offer, compare the evaluated price of the low offer to the price of the offer treated as domestic ( see 25.503 (d)(3)). Offer B can be treated as a domestic offer ($45,500). The evaluated price of the low offer (Offer C) is $46,560. Award on Offer B.
    Back to 25.504FAR Navigator
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearch
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy