Know what needs to be done in seconds.
Extract requirements from the SOW, build compliance matrices, and surface key insights automatically.
Every surface it covers
Each of these is a page of its own, with the detail for that market.
Analyze RFPs
Extract requirements, deadlines, risks, and evaluation signals from RFPs.
Analyze RFQs
Turn RFQs into fast requirement summaries and bid/no-bid clarity.
Analyze RFIs
Read RFIs faster and spot the signals that matter for early positioning.
Analyze DIBBS
Summarize DIBBS solicitations and surface the details buried in defense notices.
Analyze Grants
Break down grant requirements, fit, and submission signals without manual reading.
Analyze SBIRs
Understand eligibility, fit, and technical requirements for SBIR/STTR programs.
Why this is hard
A federal solicitation runs past a hundred pages across the notice, the statement of work, Sections L and M and a dozen attachments, and the requirements are not in one place.
Requirements are scattered by design
The obligations are in the SOW, the instructions in Section L, the scoring in Section M, and half the binding detail in attachments. Nothing maps them to each other.
The matrix takes days to build
A capture team spends one to three days extracting requirements into a compliance matrix before a bid decision can even be made, which is why many teams decide on instinct instead.
Amendments invalidate the work
An amendment can move deadlines, scope or evaluation criteria after writing has started. Re-reading the whole package by hand is what usually does not happen.
What Analyze does
SOW broken down
- Every requirement in the statement of work extracted and mapped to Section L and M.
Matrix built
- A working compliance matrix instead of a spreadsheet rebuild.
Always cited
- Each extraction points back to its page in the source document.
Meet Sammy
Sammy is the smartest AI agent on your capture team. Every RFP, RFQ, RFI, and DIBBS notice that reaches Analyze passes through Sammy first — read line by line, mapped to Section L and M, and turned into a compliance matrix before your team opens the document.
He does not summarize and stop. Sammy flags the requirements that are easy to miss under deadline pressure, cites the exact clause behind every extraction, and hands your team a starting point that is already structured, not a wall of text to read again from scratch.
What you get out of it
Every requirement extracted
- Each shall, must and will from the statement of work, pulled out and mapped to the Section L instruction and Section M factor it answers to.
A working compliance matrix
- Not a spreadsheet to rebuild. A matrix you can assign from, with a row per requirement and a place for the response to live.
Citations on every extraction
- Each item points back to the document and page it came from, so a human can verify it in seconds rather than trusting it.
A diff when the amendment lands
- Re-run the extraction and see exactly what moved, so the matrix stays true to the current solicitation.
Sammy, to ask the rest
- The questions a matrix does not answer are the ones capture leads actually have: what is the scope of work, do we meet the eligibility criteria, what is the incumbent being paid. Sammy answers them against the solicitation and its attachments, and every answer carries the citation, with the exact phrase highlighted in the source document so you can check it in a click.
The package, read on arrival
Two hundred pages across nine files, processed before anyone opens them.
Everything, not the notice
The solicitation, the statement of work, wage determinations, specifications and every amendment. Read as they land rather than when someone gets to them.
A brief you can decide from
Scope, eligibility, evaluation approach, key dates and anything unusual. Not an abstract of the notice: a read of the whole package, including what the notice never mentions.
Ask the solicitation anything
Sammy reads the notice and every attachment, then answers with the source and the page beside the answer.
The questions a matrix cannot answer
What is actually in scope, do we meet the eligibility criteria, what is the incumbent being paid, is a facility clearance required, what does Section M weight most.
Verifiable, not just plausible
Each answer links to the source document and highlights the phrase it came from, so you are checking a citation rather than trusting a summary.
An honest 'not stated'
Where the package does not say, Sammy says so instead of filling the gap. That is what makes the other answers usable.
When the amendment lands, it is read again
Deadlines move, page limits change and evaluation factors get reweighted after people have started writing.
Diffed, not just re-posted
The new version is compared against the old one and the fields that moved are listed. No opening two PDFs side by side to find out what changed.
The matrix follows
Requirements are re-extracted, tasks carrying the old dates move with them, and everyone watching the pursuit is notified.
Frequently asked questions
What is a compliance matrix in government proposals?
What are Section L and Section M?
How long does it take to review an RFP?
Can AI read the attachments, not just the solicitation?
Can you ask questions about an RFP instead of reading it?
What happens when an amendment changes the requirements?
Automate the full GovCon cycle
Each stage runs off the same profile, the same documents and the same pipeline. Click any stage to see how it works.
See the whole cycle in one platform.
Book a 20-minute demo and we will walk your team through the stage that is costing you the most.