samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/News/Berry Amendment Requires Domestic Production for Covered DoD Purchases
    federal_newspolicy

    Berry Amendment Requires Domestic Production for Covered DoD Purchases

    The Berry Amendment bars the Department of Defense from using funds to buy covered products unless they meet U.S.-origin requirements, subject to statutory and DFARS exceptions. Contractors should map sourcing across the production chain and confirm which threshold and exception apply before bidding.

    October 31, 2026U.S. Department of Defense, Congressional Research Service

    Key Signals

    • DoD covered-item bids require U.S.-origin traceability across the production chain
    • Confirm whether the $150,000 statutory or $200,000 DFARS threshold governs
    • Screen food, textiles, tents, tools, flatware, and flags for Berry coverage
    • Review DFARS 225.7002-2 exceptions with the solicitation and contracting officer
    • Berry compliance may require stricter sourcing than Buy American Act compliance

    The Berry Amendment, codified at 10 U.S.C. 4862, restricts the Department of Defense (DoD) from using its funds to procure specified products that were not grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States. The covered categories include food; clothing and its materials and components; tents, structural components, tarpaulins, and covers; specified natural- and synthetic-fiber products; hand or measuring tools; stainless steel flatware and dinnerware; and U.S. flags. The law applies to DoD purchases, including commercial products, and the definition of the United States includes U.S. possessions. It does not generally regulate a private laboratory’s ordinary purchases outside DoD procurement.

    For contractors, the central compliance issue is the breadth of the domestic-origin test. The source explains that the entire production process for a covered product must be performed in the United States, encompassing raw materials, components, and final assembly or production. Domestic sewing, finishing, or assembly alone may not satisfy the requirement if covered fabric, fibers, or components originated abroad. This makes supplier visibility and traceable documentation important well before proposal submission, particularly for products that combine multiple materials or rely on upstream subcontractors.

    DoD implements the statute through the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) at 225.7002. The DFARS exceptions at 225.7002-2 form part of the contracting officer’s practical review, while the source highlights distinct $150,000 statutory and $200,000 DFARS thresholds. Those figures should not be treated as interchangeable: offerors need to review the solicitation, the applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, and any stated exception, and should seek clarification from the contracting officer where the governing rule is uncertain. The guidance also notes that whether an individual product falls within a statutory category can require a case-specific determination.

    The Berry Amendment is more demanding in its domestic-content approach than the Buy American Act, according to the source’s summary of Congressional Research Service analysis. The Berry framework focuses on the entire production process for covered DoD items, while the Buy American Act applies to most procurement at other federal agencies and uses a different content test. This distinction matters to companies that sell similar goods across federal markets: a product or sourcing model acceptable under one regime may not meet Berry requirements for a DoD solicitation. Procurement, supply-chain, and contracts teams should therefore screen solicitations by agency, product category, threshold, and exception rather than rely on a general “domestic preference” assessment.

    • Legal basis: The Berry Amendment is codified at 10 U.S.C. 4862 and restricts use of DoD funds for noncompliant covered items.
    • Covered categories: Food; clothing and related materials or components; tents, structural components, tarpaulins and covers; specified fiber and textile products; hand or measuring tools; stainless steel flatware and dinnerware; and U.S. flags.
    • Origin test: Contractors should be prepared to document U.S. origin across raw materials, components, and final production—not merely final assembly.
    • Threshold distinction: The source identifies a $150,000 statutory threshold and a $200,000 DFARS threshold; confirm which applies to the solicitation and relevant exception.
    • Implementation: DoD addresses the requirements through DFARS 225.7002, with exceptions listed at DFARS 225.7002-2.
    • Product review: Coverage may be case-specific; engage the contracting officer when a product’s classification or the applicable exception is uncertain.
    • Commercial products: The source states that the statute applies to commercial products, notwithstanding 41 U.S.C. 1906.
    • Geographic scope: The statute’s definition of the United States includes U.S. possessions.
    • Time-sensitive category: Stainless steel flatware and dinnerware is described as effective January 1, 2026, and scheduled for repeal on January 1, 2029.
    • Bid preparation: Build supplier-origin records and solicitation screening into proposal and procurement workflows; do not assume that compliance with the Buy American Act establishes Berry compliance.

    Agencies

    • U.S. Department of Defense
    • Congressional Research Service

    Vendors

    • CASRAI

    Locations

    • United States
    • U.S. possessions

    Sources

    • Berry Amendment: Requirements and Exceptions — CASRAICASRAI · Oct 31
    Regulatory ComplianceDefenseDomestic SourcingSupply ChainBerry Amendment
    ← Back to News
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearchUsers Love Us
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy