Emerging Roles in Product Security Reflect Shifting Governance Needs

    The evolving landscape of product security roles underscores the integration of governance with engineering expertise, particularly in regulated sectors. Procurement strategies must adapt to prioritize vendors demonstrating both security governance and technical capabilities for effective software development lifecycle influence.

    Key Signals

    • Vendors should emphasize technical capabilities alongside security governance in proposals
    • Procurement strategies should adapt to the emphasis on integrated product security roles
    • Candidates with both governance and engineering experience will be favored in regulated sectors

    "Yes, product security roles do exist. From what I've seen, many of them are in Engineering and adjacent to (meaning lots of dashed lines) Security rather than being in Security itself. I report to the CPO and I am dashed line to the CISO for example."

    Original poster

    In recent years, the complexities surrounding product security governance have reshaped the expectations organizations hold regarding the qualifications for key roles in this domain. Traditionally, positions that emphasize governance without a complementary focus on application security engineering have been relatively rare, often confined to highly regulated industries or the realms of large and complex product environments. This shift is underscored by an emerging perspective: organizations increasingly prioritize candidates who possess hands-on engineering experience alongside their governance expertise. This fusion of capabilities is becoming crucial for effectively influencing secure software development lifecycle (SDLC) practices and other product security initiatives.

    One manifestation of this trend can be seen in the job titles proliferating across the industry. Roles such as Product Security Engineer, Technical Program Manager, and Product Manager with security governance responsibilities are becoming commonplace, particularly within security software vendors and sectors where regulation is stringent. The integration of governance into product security roles is critical, indicating that employers are favoring candidates who can bridge the gap between security frameworks and technical execution. Such roles require individuals to not only engage in governance oversight but also possess deep technical knowledge to contribute meaningfully to security strategy implementation.

    This dual requirement for technical prowess and security governance has significant implications for procurement practices. Procurement professionals need to be astutely aware of the evolving landscape when qualifying vendors and evaluating proposals. As organizations gravitate towards candidates or vendors showcasing engineering credentials alongside governance experience, this trend will undoubtedly influence vendor selection and contracting decisions. Procurement strategies should pivot towards emphasizing technical proficiency in product security as a paramount criterion, ensuring that selected vendors can meet both security governance standards and the technical demands of modern-day software development.

    Vendors specializing in security solutions and services ought to strategically position their offerings by highlighting integrated competencies that encompass both governance and engineering. In the current climate, merely having governance as a standalone focus will likely fall short of the evolving market expectations set forth by procurement teams actively seeking comprehensive solutions.

    Sources