samsearch
    Platform
    01InfluenceShape the requirement before it's on your competitor's radar.
    Signal
    Recompete window opens in 42 days
    Facilities maintenance IDIQ$8.4M
    Forecast
    Agency spend up 18% next FY
    DoD facilitiesQ3 window
    02CaptureFind and qualify the work across every market.
    Federal91%
    Network engineering support — GSA MAS
    GSA541512
    SLED88%
    Custodial services — Fairfax County Public Schools
    K-12561720
    DIBBS79%
    Aircraft hydraulic fitting — DLA Aviation
    DLANSN 5330
    03AnalyzeExtract requirements and build the compliance matrix.
    Compliance matrix
    L.2.1Technical approachVol I
    L.3.4Staffing planVol I
    M.1Past performanceEvaluated
    SOW breakdown
    Requirements extracted38
    Mapped to Section L/M38
    Every extractionCited
    Ask Sammy
    “Do we meet the small business set-aside?”
    04ManageRun the pursuit through to award.
    Pipeline
    QualifyFacilities support · USACE
    CaptureComms upgrade · DLA
    ProposalShipyard dredging · NAVSEA
    PriyaAlex
    This week
    Submit past performance refsThu
    Confirm subK teamingFri
    Upload SF 33Mon
    05RespondDraft and submit your response.
    Drafting · Volume I
    247 words
    RFI response
    CompanyAcme Robotics LLC
    UEIJK4M8…
    Capability narrativeDrafted
    06FinanceGet paid faster on what you win.
    Capital available
    $2.4M against your award
    Facilities maintenance IDIQAwarded
    Partner matched
    LenderFederal Capital Partners
    Draw available$2.4M
    UnderwritingCleared
    The platform
    Influence
    Capture
    Analyze
    Manage
    Respond
    Finance
    One pipeline, six stages, start to award.
    See the whole platform
    Solutions
    By industry
    Tech & softwareSoftware and SaaS companies entering GovCon.Defense contractorsPrimes and subs in the defense industrial base.ConstructionBuilders bidding federal, state, and local work.CybersecuritySecurity vendors pursuing federal mandates.
    By team
    Capture managers & BDPipeline, qualification, and win strategy.Proposal teamsCompliance matrices and proposal drafting.Subcontractors & primesTeaming, subcontracting, and partner fit.
    By company size
    Small businessesSet-aside and small business contractors.EnterpriseLarge contractors running multiple pursuits.ConsultantsAdvisors and capture consultants.
    Browse all industries
    CustomersPricing
    ResourcesNew
    Learn
    AcademyCourses, guides, and playbooks.WebinarsLive sessions and recordings.DocsProduct documentation and setup guides.Implementation planOperational rollout guidance.
    Tools & data
    Free GovCon toolsCalculators, lookups, and more.Gov ExploreContracts, agencies, and NAICS codes.GovCon eventsConferences, training, and set-aside events.
    Latest blogIntroducing the New SamSearch: The Operating System for Government ContractingSamSearch has a new brand, a new site, and a new way of explaining what the platform actually does — the operating system for government contracting, organized around six stages instead of a single search box. Here's what changed and why.Read the post →
    All resources and tools
    Sign inRequest a demo
    Home/News/Swinerton Case Study Highlights PLOT Procurement Software at San Diego State
    state_local_newscompany

    Swinerton Case Study Highlights PLOT Procurement Software at San Diego State

    PLOT’s case study describes Swinerton’s use of its construction procurement software on San Diego State University’s Evolve student housing project. The company estimates the shared workflow saved a three-person team 14–16 staff hours per week; the report is not an independently verified performance assessment and announces no solicitation, award, or funding opportunity.

    November 5, 2026San Diego State University

    Key Signals

    • PLOT case study reports estimated 14–16 weekly staff hours saved for a three-person team
    • Swinerton used shared procurement workflows on San Diego State’s Evolve housing project
    • Case highlights schedule visibility and subcontractor collaboration as software evaluation factors
    • Reported efficiency is a company estimate, not an independently verified result
    • No solicitation, award, or funding opportunity announced

    "PLOT gave us the visibility we needed without the complexity that slows adoption. It also provided a hub that encouraged subcontractor collaboration."

    — Monika Iannone, Project Executive at Swinerton

    PLOT published a case study on Swinerton’s use of its construction procurement software during work on San Diego State University’s Evolve student housing project in San Diego. The example centers on coordinating procurement, submittals, deliveries, and schedule information through a shared workflow. For public-sector owners, construction contractors, and subcontractors, the project offers a practical illustration of how digital tools may support coordination across complex building work. It is a company-published case study, however, rather than a government notice or independently evaluated project report.

    The case reports estimated savings of 14–16 staff hours per week for a three-person team. PLOT attributes the potential efficiency to bringing procurement and schedule-related information into a common workflow. Those figures should be treated as estimates reported in the case study, not as audited or independently verified outcomes. Agencies and industry teams considering comparable tools can use the claimed savings as a point of comparison, but should establish their own baselines for staff time, document handling, coordination delays, and adoption effort before drawing conclusions about return on investment.

    Swinerton Project Executive Monika Iannone emphasized visibility and ease of adoption: “PLOT gave us the visibility we needed without the complexity that slows adoption. It also provided a hub that encouraged subcontractor collaboration.” The comments point to two operational considerations for construction technology evaluations: whether project participants can quickly see relevant schedule and procurement status, and whether subcontractors can collaborate through the selected platform. A.O. Reed & Co.’s comments are also identified as part of the case study’s discussion of subcontractor collaboration, although the source material provided does not include a direct quotation or additional attributed details from the company.

    For government contractors pursuing public university and other public-sector construction work, the case is best read as a technology-use example rather than a procurement lead. It does not announce a solicitation, contract award, new funding, or a change in San Diego State University procurement policy. Contractors and owners may nevertheless find the example useful when assessing project controls and construction management capabilities, including how a shared information environment could fit existing practices. Any procurement decision would require separate evaluation of requirements, interoperability, security, implementation, user adoption, and the evidence supporting claimed performance benefits.

    • Project: San Diego State University’s Evolve student housing project in San Diego.
    • Software provider: PLOT, which published the case study on its construction procurement software.
    • Construction contractor: Swinerton used the software on the project; A.O. Reed & Co. is identified in connection with subcontractor collaboration.
    • Reported benefit: An estimated 14–16 staff hours saved per week for a three-person team, according to the company-published case study.
    • Workflow areas: Procurement, submittals, deliveries, and schedule information were coordinated through a shared workflow.
    • Evaluation consideration: Treat the time-savings figure as an estimate, and compare it against project-specific baselines and workflow needs.
    • Adoption insight: Swinerton’s project executive highlighted visibility, reduced complexity, and a hub for subcontractor collaboration.
    • Procurement status: The case study does not announce a solicitation, contract award, or funding opportunity.
    • Potential GovCon relevance: Public owners and construction firms can assess whether shared procurement and schedule tools address coordination needs on their own projects.

    Agencies

    • San Diego State University

    Vendors

    • PLOT
    • Swinerton
    • A.O. Reed & Co.

    Locations

    • San Diego

    Sources

    • PLOT Publishes Swinerton Case Study on Construction Procurement Software - Kitsap SunKitsap Sun · Nov 05
    Construction & InfrastructureInformation TechnologyConstruction ProcurementProject ManagementHigher Education
    ← Back to News
    samsearch

    The Complete AI Platform for Government Contracting

    Platform
    • Product
    • Pricing
    • ROI calculator
    • Integrations
    • Changelog
    Solutions
    • Solutions
    • Customers
    • Comparisons
    • Market watch
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Free GovCon tools
    • Glossary
    • Docs
    Company
    • API & partnerships
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Compliance
    • Trust centre
    • Contact
    Recognised & verified
    SOC 2 Type II Compliant, SamSearchAWS Partner - Advanced, SamSearch on AWS MarketplaceGartner Peer Insights Customer First, SamSearchUsers Love Us
    Ask AI about samsearch
    Ask ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity
    Follow

    © 2026 samsearch. All rights reserved.

    Terms of usePrivacy policy