We the Doers and Verdance Develop Anonymous Federal Feedback Prototype

We the Doers and public-interest technology firm Verdance are developing a prototype intended to let federal employees provide anonymous feedback on draft legislation. The effort is an early civic-technology development signal involving potential ways to collect expertise from within government, rather than a confirmed federal acquisition. The available source material does not identify an agency sponsor, a solicitation, a contract, funding, or a purchasing office. GovCon companies should therefore distinguish the prototype and public discussion from an actionable procurement notice.

A National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) town hall is scheduled for October 22, 2026, to discuss the concept. The event is a forum for considering the idea, not a proposal deadline or procurement milestone. The discussion raises practical questions about whether rank-and-file employees can contribute to legislative feedback, how anonymity might work, and what safeguards would be needed to manage conflicts of interest. It also places the proposal alongside existing government channels rather than describing a replacement for them.

The source describes agency legislative-affairs channels and executive-branch review processes as part of the current landscape. A community commenter summarized one process this way: “Congressional drafts are routinely sent for executive branch feedback; Executive Office of the President compiles an Administration position after input by agency subject-matter experts.” That account underscores a key implementation issue: a new feedback tool would have to define how employee input relates to agency subject-matter review, legislative-affairs coordination, and the administration’s formal position. The source also identifies the absence of a standard public-comment process for legislation as part of the broader context.

For procurement professionals, the immediate value is market awareness, not pipeline qualification. Civic-tech vendors, systems integrators, and agencies exploring employee engagement platforms may monitor the concept for future requirements, but the current signal does not establish federal demand or a buying pathway. Any eventual government use would likely require decisions on access, confidentiality, information handling, conflicts, governance, and how feedback is routed and evaluated. These are considerations raised by the concept, not stated requirements or specifications. The source mentions Wisconsin state government in its agency list but does not explain a specific role in the prototype or town hall; no additional connection should be inferred.

• We the Doers and Verdance are developing a prototype for anonymous federal employee feedback on draft legislation.
• A NARFE town hall is scheduled for October 22, 2026, to discuss the concept; it is not a solicitation event or proposal deadline.
• The source identifies existing agency legislative-affairs channels and executive-branch review as relevant processes.
• A community commenter says the Executive Office of the President compiles an Administration position after agency subject-matter experts provide input on congressional drafts.
• The discussion raises questions about rank-and-file employee access, anonymity, conflicts of interest, and safeguards.
• The source notes the absence of a standard public-comment process for legislation, creating context for the proposed feedback approach.
• No solicitation, funding, contract value, purchasing agency, or formal agency requirement is identified.
• Treat this as an early civic technology and market-awareness signal; monitor for subsequent agency sponsorship, requirements, or procurement notices.