Federal grants search, with eligibility checked first.
samsearch is an AI platform for federal grants. It indexes every funding opportunity announcement published to Grants.gov. It reads the full announcement rather than the abstract. And it puts the two deciding facts at the top of the record. How much money is available, and whether your organisation is allowed to apply.
Search programmes in plain English. Get the review criteria before you write. Ask the announcement a question. Draft against the rubric reviewers actually score.
Book a DemoEligibility is a gate, not a preference
A grant you are not eligible for is not a long shot. It is a zero.
Contracts are competed. Grants are gated.
On a contract a weak match is a low probability. On a grant, if your organisation type is not on the eligibility list, the application is not reviewed at all.
Checked before it reaches you
samsearch reads the eligibility section of every announcement and checks it against your organisation type. A grant closed to you is visibly closed, not something you discover on page forty.
The money as fields, not prose
Award ceiling, award floor, expected number of awards and total programme funding. A $750,000 ceiling means something different when only three awards are expected.
Cost share surfaced
Whether a match is required, what it can consist of, and at what rate. A 50 per cent match changes the economics entirely, and it is usually buried in the announcement.
The announcement, read in full
A funding opportunity announcement runs to fifty or a hundred pages. The abstract on the search page is a paragraph.
Programme purpose and allowable activities
What the money is actually for, and what you are permitted to spend it on. Pulled from the whole document, not the summary field.
Review criteria, extracted
How the application will be scored and what weight each criterion carries. This is the single most useful thing in a NOFO and the most commonly skipped.
Required components listed
Project narrative, budget and justification, logic model, letters of commitment, indirect cost agreement. Everything the package must contain, as a checklist.
The deadline stack
Letters of intent, pre-applications, full application deadlines, and the registration prerequisites that take weeks. Missing one of those is the most common reason a submission fails.
Ask the announcement anything
Sammy reads the NOFO and its attachments, then answers with the page beside the answer.
Questions worth asking early
- Are indirect costs allowable, and at what rate
- What can the match consist of
- Are subawards permitted
- Is a letter of intent required
- Does this fund equipment or only personnel
Answered against
- The full announcement and its attachments
- Programme-specific instructions
- Modifications, at the current version
- Previous years' announcements for the same listing
With the receipts
- Document and page on every answer
- The phrase it came from, highlighted
- An honest 'not stated' when it is not stated
Draft against the rubric, not the blank page
Reviewers score against published criteria. A draft structured any other way is fighting the scoring sheet.
Structured to the review criteria
The draft follows the criteria and required components extracted from the announcement, so reviewers find what they are scoring where they expect it.
Grounded in what you own
Written from your approved content, prior applications and organisational record. Nothing is invented from a model's general knowledge.
Requirements tracked live
Every required component is tracked against the draft, so what is still missing is visible weeks before the deadline rather than on the final weekend.
The narrative is still yours
It cannot supply your theory of change, your community relationships or the reason this programme should fund you. It gets you to a compliant first draft.
What is on every grant record
- Identity
- Funding opportunity number
- Assistance listing, formerly CFDA
- Agency and awarding office
- Opportunity category
- Funding instrument type
- Posted, closing and archive dates
- Money
- Award ceiling and floor
- Expected number of awards
- Total programme funding
- Cost share or match requirement
- Project and budget periods
- Gates
- Eligible applicant types
- Whether your organisation type qualifies
- Registration prerequisites
- Letter of intent deadlines
- Geographic or population restrictions
- Derived by samsearch
- Plain-English announcement summary
- Extracted review criteria and weights
- Required components checklist
- Fit score with its reasoning
- Modification history
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a federal grant, and how does it differ from a contract?
Where are federal grants published?
How do I know whether my organisation is eligible?
What is an assistance listing number?
What does cost share mean on a grant?
Does samsearch summarise the full announcement?
Can I ask questions about a funding opportunity?
Can small businesses apply for federal grants?
Will I get alerted when a new grant matches?
How far ahead can I see grant opportunities?
What registrations do I need before applying?
Does samsearch write grant applications?
Can I search grants alongside contracts?
How current is the grant data?
See which grants your organisation can actually apply for.
A demo filters live funding opportunities by your organisation type and your programme areas.